Everything you need to know about ranked-choice voting in one spot. Click to learn more!

TEOFILO MEDINA, JR. v. CALIFORNIA (1992)

From Ballotpedia
Jump to: navigation, search

Seal of the Supreme Court of the United States
TEOFILO MEDINA, JR. v. CALIFORNIA
Term: 1991
Important Dates
Argued: February 25, 1992
Decided: June 22, 1992
Outcome
Affirmed (includes modified)
Vote
7-2
Majority
Anthony Kennedy • William Rehnquist • Antonin Scalia • Clarence Thomas • Byron White
Concurring
Sandra Day O'Connor • David Souter
Dissenting
Harry Blackmun • John Paul Stevens

TEOFILO MEDINA, JR. v. CALIFORNIA is a case that was decided by the Supreme Court of the United States on June 22, 1992. The case was argued before the court on February 25, 1992.

In a 7-2 ruling, the U.S. Supreme Court affirmed the ruling of the lower court. The case originated from the California State Trial Court.

For a full list of cases decided in the 1990s, click here. For a full list of cases decided by the Rehnquist Court, click here.

[1]

About the case

  • Subject matter: Due Process - Due process: miscellaneous (cf. loyalty oath), the residual code
  • Petitioner: Defendant
  • Petitioner state: Unknown
  • Respondent type: State
  • Respondent state: California
  • Citation: 505 U.S. 437
  • How the court took jurisdiction: Cert
  • What type of decision was made: Opinion of the court (orally argued)
  • Who was the chief justice: William Rehnquist
  • Who wrote the majority opinion: Anthony Kennedy

These data points were accessed from The Supreme Court Database, which also attempts to categorize the ideological direction of the court's ruling in each case. This case's ruling was categorized as conservative.

See also

External links

Footnotes

  1. ↑ Harold J. Spaeth, Lee Epstein, et al., "2023 Supreme Court Database, Version 2023 Release 1 and SCDB Legacy 07," accessed March 21, 2024
Retrieved from "https://ballotpedia.org/wiki/index.php?title=TEOFILO_MEDINA,_JR._v._CALIFORNIA_(1992)&oldid=9506597"