Help us improve in just 2 minutes—share your thoughts in our reader survey.
TEXTILE MACHINE WORKS v. LOUIS HIRSCH TEXTILE MACHINES, INC. (1938)

![]() |
TEXTILE MACHINE WORKS v. LOUIS HIRSCH TEXTILE MACHINES, INC. |
---|
Term: 1937 |
Important Dates |
Argued: November 19, 1937 |
Decided: January 3, 1938 |
Outcome |
Affirmed (includes modified) |
Vote |
9-0 |
Majority |
Hugo Black • Louis Dembitz Brandeis • Pierce Butler • Benjamin Nathan Cardozo • Charles Evans Hughes • James Clark McReynolds • Owen Josephus Roberts • Harlan Fiske Stone • George Sutherland |
TEXTILE MACHINE WORKS v. LOUIS HIRSCH TEXTILE MACHINES, INC. is a case that was decided by the Supreme Court of the United States on January 3, 1938. The case was argued before the court on November 19, 1937.
In a 9-0 ruling, the U.S. Supreme Court affirmed the ruling of the lower court. The case originated from the New York Southern U.S. District Court.
For a full list of cases decided in the 1930s, click here. For a full list of cases decided by the Hughes Court, click here.
About the case
- Subject matter: Economic Activity - Patents and copyrights: patent
- Petitioner: Inventor, patent assigner, trademark owner or holder
- Petitioner state: Unknown
- Respondent type: Manufacturer
- Respondent state: Unknown
- Citation: 302 U.S. 490
- How the court took jurisdiction: Cert
- What type of decision was made: Opinion of the court (orally argued)
- Who was the chief justice: Charles Evans Hughes
- Who wrote the majority opinion: Harlan Fiske Stone
These data points were accessed from The Supreme Court Database, which also attempts to categorize the ideological direction of the court's ruling in each case. This case's ruling was categorized as conservative.
See also
- United States Supreme Court cases and courts
- Supreme Court of the United States
- History of the Supreme Court
- United States federal courts
- Ballotpedia's Robe & Gavel newsletter
External links
Footnotes