THE CITIZENS BANK v. ALAFABCO, INC., et al. (2003)

![]() |
THE CITIZENS BANK v. ALAFABCO, INC., et al. |
---|
Term: 2002 |
Important Dates |
Decided: June 2, 2003 |
Outcome |
Reversed and remanded |
Vote |
9-0 |
Majority |
Stephen Breyer • Ruth Bader Ginsburg • Anthony Kennedy • Sandra Day O'Connor • William Rehnquist • Antonin Scalia • David Souter • John Paul Stevens • Clarence Thomas |
THE CITIZENS BANK v. ALAFABCO, INC., et al. is a case that was decided by the Supreme Court of the United States on June 2, 2003.
In a 9-0 ruling, the U.S. Supreme Court reversed the ruling of the lower court and remanded the case for further proceedings consistent with the Court's opinion. The case originated from the Alabama State Trial Court.
For a full list of cases decided in the 2000s, click here. For a full list of cases decided by the Rehnquist Court, click here.
About the case
- Subject matter: Economic Activity - Arbitration (other than as pertains to labor-management or employer-employee relations (cf. union arbitration)
- Petitioner: Bank, savings and loan, credit union, investment company
- Petitioner state: Unknown
- Respondent type: Construction industry
- Respondent state: Unknown
- Citation: 539 U.S. 52
- How the court took jurisdiction: Cert
- What type of decision was made: Per curiam (no oral argument)
- Who was the chief justice: William Rehnquist
- Who wrote the majority opinion: Unknown
These data points were accessed from The Supreme Court Database, which also attempts to categorize the ideological direction of the court's ruling in each case. This case's ruling was categorized as conservative.
See also
- United States Supreme Court cases and courts
- Supreme Court of the United States
- History of the Supreme Court
- United States federal courts
- Ballotpedia's Robe & Gavel newsletter
External links
Footnotes