Everything you need to know about ranked-choice voting in one spot. Click to learn more!

THE CITY OF PROVIDENCE, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR, v. DANIEL R. CLAPP (1855)

From Ballotpedia
Jump to: navigation, search

Seal of the Supreme Court of the United States
THE CITY OF PROVIDENCE, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR, v. DANIEL R. CLAPP
Term: 1854
Important Dates
Argued: December 27, 1854
Decided: January 16, 1855
Outcome
Affirmed (includes modified)
Vote
8-1
Majority
John Archibald CampbellJohn CatronBenjamin Robbins CurtisRobert Cooper GrierJohn McLeanSamuel NelsonRoger Brooke TaneyJames Moore Wayne
Dissenting
Peter Vivian Daniel

THE CITY OF PROVIDENCE, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR, v. DANIEL R. CLAPP is a case that was decided by the Supreme Court of the United States on January 16, 1855. The case was argued before the court on December 27, 1854.

In an 8-1 ruling, the U.S. Supreme Court affirmed the ruling of the lower court. The case originated from the Rhode Island U.S. Circuit for the District of Rhode Island.

For a full list of cases decided in the 1850s, click here. For a full list of cases decided by the Taney Court, click here.

[1]

About the case

  • Subject matter: Economic Activity - Liability, governmental: tort or contract actions by or against government or governmental officials other than defense of criminal actions brought under a civil rights action.
  • Petitioner: City, town, township, village, or borough government or governmental unit
  • Petitioner state: Rhode Island
  • Respondent type: Physically injured person, including wrongful death, who is not an employee
  • Respondent state: Unknown
  • Citation: 58 U.S. 161
  • How the court took jurisdiction: Writ of error
  • What type of decision was made: Opinion of the court (orally argued)
  • Who was the chief justice: Roger Brooke Taney
  • Who wrote the majority opinion: Samuel Nelson

These data points were accessed from The Supreme Court Database, which also attempts to categorize the ideological direction of the court's ruling in each case. This case's ruling was categorized as conservative.

See also

External links

Footnotes