Your feedback ensures we stay focused on the facts that matter to you most—take our survey
THE TRAVELERS INDEMNITY COMPANY, et al. v. PEARLIE BAILEY et al. (2009)
- Justices
- CASES BY TERM
- Supreme Court cases, October term 2025-2026
- Supreme Court cases, October term 2024-2025
- Supreme Court cases, October term 2023-2024
- Supreme Court cases, October term 2022-2023
- Supreme Court cases, October term 2021-2022
- Supreme Court cases, October term 2020-2021
- Supreme Court cases, October term 2019-2020
- Supreme Court cases, October term 2018-2019
- Supreme Court cases, October term 2017-2018
- Supreme Court cases, October term 2016-2017
- Supreme Court cases, October term 2015-2016
- All earlier cases
- HISTORY OF THE COURT
- Recent vacancies
 |
| THE TRAVELERS INDEMNITY COMPANY, et al. v. PEARLIE BAILEY et al. |
|---|
| Term: 2008 |
| Important Dates |
| Argued: March 30, 2009 |
| Decided: June 18, 2009 |
| Outcome |
| Reversed and remanded |
| Vote |
| 7-2 |
| Majority |
| Samuel Alito • Stephen Breyer • Anthony Kennedy • John Roberts • Antonin Scalia • David Souter • Clarence Thomas |
| Dissenting |
| Ruth Bader Ginsburg • John Paul Stevens |
THE TRAVELERS INDEMNITY COMPANY, et al. v. PEARLIE BAILEY et al. is a case that was decided by the Supreme Court of the United States on June 18, 2009. The case was argued before the court on March 30, 2009.
In a 7-2 ruling, the U.S. Supreme Court reversed the ruling of the lower court and remanded the case for further proceedings consistent with the Court's opinion. The case originated from the New York Southern U.S. District Court.
For a full list of cases decided in the 2000s, click here. For a full list of cases decided by the Roberts Court, click here.
About the case
- Subject matter: Economic Activity - Bankruptcy (except in the context of priority of federal fiscal claims)
- Petitioner: Insurance company, or surety
- Petitioner state: Unknown
- Respondent type: Insurance company, or surety
- Respondent state: Unknown
- Citation: 557 U.S. 137
- How the court took jurisdiction: Cert
- What type of decision was made: Opinion of the court (orally argued)
- Who was the chief justice: John Roberts
- Who wrote the majority opinion: David Souter
These data points were accessed from The Supreme Court Database, which also attempts to categorize the ideological direction of the court's ruling in each case. This case's ruling was categorized as conservative.
See also
- United States Supreme Court cases and courts
- Supreme Court of the United States
- History of the Supreme Court
- United States federal courts
- Ballotpedia's Robe & Gavel newsletter
External links
Footnotes
