THE UNITED STATES, PLAINTIFFS IN ERROR, v. WILLIAM LINN AND OTHERS (1843)
- Justices
- CASES BY TERM
- Supreme Court cases, October term 2025-2026
- Supreme Court cases, October term 2024-2025
- Supreme Court cases, October term 2023-2024
- Supreme Court cases, October term 2022-2023
- Supreme Court cases, October term 2021-2022
- Supreme Court cases, October term 2020-2021
- Supreme Court cases, October term 2019-2020
- Supreme Court cases, October term 2018-2019
- Supreme Court cases, October term 2017-2018
- Supreme Court cases, October term 2016-2017
- Supreme Court cases, October term 2015-2016
- All earlier cases
- HISTORY OF THE COURT
- Recent vacancies
 |
| THE UNITED STATES, PLAINTIFFS IN ERROR, v. WILLIAM LINN AND OTHERS |
|---|
| Term: 1843 |
| Important Dates |
| Argued: January 11, 1843 |
| Decided: January 26, 1843 |
| Outcome |
| Reversed and remanded |
| Vote |
| 6-1 |
| Majority |
| Henry Baldwin • John Catron • Peter Vivian Daniel • Roger Brooke Taney • Smith Thompson • James Moore Wayne |
| Dissenting |
| John McLean |
THE UNITED STATES, PLAINTIFFS IN ERROR, v. WILLIAM LINN AND OTHERS is a case that was decided by the Supreme Court of the United States on January 26, 1843. The case was argued before the court on January 11, 1843.
In a 6-1 ruling, the U.S. Supreme Court reversed the ruling of the lower court and remanded the case for further proceedings consistent with the Court's opinion. The case originated from the Illinois U.S. Circuit for (all) District(s) of Illinois.
For a full list of cases decided in the 1840s, click here. For a full list of cases decided by the Taney Court, click here.
About the case
- Subject matter: Private Action - Civil procedure
- Petitioner: United States
- Petitioner state: Unknown
- Respondent type: Governmental official, or an official of an agency established under an interstate compact
- Respondent state: United States
- Citation: 42 U.S. 104
- How the court took jurisdiction: Writ of error
- What type of decision was made: Opinion of the court (orally argued)
- Who was the chief justice: Roger Brooke Taney
- Who wrote the majority opinion: Smith Thompson
These data points were accessed from The Supreme Court Database, which also attempts to categorize the ideological direction of the court's ruling in each case. This case's ruling was categorized as unspecifiable.
See also
- United States Supreme Court cases and courts
- Supreme Court of the United States
- History of the Supreme Court
- United States federal courts
- Ballotpedia's Robe & Gavel newsletter
External links
Footnotes
