Your monthly support provides voters the knowledge they need to make confident decisions at the polls. Donate today.
THE UNITED STATES, PLAINTIFFS IN ERROR v. ELEAZAR W. RIPLEY (1833)

![]() |
THE UNITED STATES, PLAINTIFFS IN ERROR v. ELEAZAR W. RIPLEY |
---|
Term: 1833 |
Important Dates |
Argued: January 31, 1833 |
Decided: February 26, 1833 |
Outcome |
Reversed and remanded |
Vote |
6-0 |
Majority |
Gabriel Duvall • William Johnson Jr. • John Marshall • John McLean • Joseph Story • Smith Thompson |
THE UNITED STATES, PLAINTIFFS IN ERROR v. ELEAZAR W. RIPLEY is a case that was decided by the Supreme Court of the United States on February 26, 1833. The case was argued before the court on January 31, 1833.
In a 6-0 ruling, the U.S. Supreme Court reversed the ruling of the lower court and remanded the case for further proceedings consistent with the Court's opinion. The case originated from the Louisiana Eastern U.S. District Court.
For a full list of cases decided in the 1830s, click here. For a full list of cases decided by the Marshall Court, click here.
About the case
- Subject matter: Economic Activity - Corruption, governmental or governmental regulation of other than as in campaign spending
- Petitioner: United States
- Petitioner state: Unknown
- Respondent type: Military personnel, or dependent of, including reservist
- Respondent state: Unknown
- Citation: 32 U.S. 18
- How the court took jurisdiction: Writ of error
- What type of decision was made: Opinion of the court (orally argued)
- Who was the chief justice: John Marshall
- Who wrote the majority opinion: John McLean
These data points were accessed from The Supreme Court Database, which also attempts to categorize the ideological direction of the court's ruling in each case. This case's ruling was categorized as liberal.
See also
- United States Supreme Court cases and courts
- Supreme Court of the United States
- History of the Supreme Court
- United States federal courts
- Ballotpedia's Robe & Gavel newsletter
External links
Footnotes