Your monthly support provides voters the knowledge they need to make confident decisions at the polls. Donate today.
THE UNITED STATES VERSUS LA VENGEANCE (1796)

![]() |
THE UNITED STATES VERSUS LA VENGEANCE |
---|
Term: 1796 |
Important Dates |
Argued: August 10, 1796 |
Decided: August 11, 1796 |
Outcome |
Affirmed (includes modified) |
Vote |
6-0 |
Majority |
Samuel Chase • William Cushing • Oliver Ellsworth • James Iredell • William Paterson • James Wilson |
THE UNITED STATES VERSUS LA VENGEANCE is a case that was decided by the Supreme Court of the United States on August 11, 1796. The case was argued before the court on August 10, 1796.
In a 6-0 ruling, the U.S. Supreme Court affirmed the ruling of the lower court. The case originated from the New York U.S. District Court.
For a full list of cases decided in the 1790s, click here. For a full list of cases decided by the Ellsworth Court, click here.
About the case
- Subject matter: Due Process - Due process: takings clause, or other non-constitutional governmental taking of property
- Petitioner: United States
- Petitioner state: Unknown
- Respondent type: Tangible property, other than real estate, including contraband
- Respondent state: Unknown
- Citation: 3 U.S. 297
- How the court took jurisdiction: Writ of error
- What type of decision was made: Per curiam (orally argued)
- Who was the chief justice: Oliver Ellsworth
- Who wrote the majority opinion: Unknown
These data points were accessed from The Supreme Court Database, which also attempts to categorize the ideological direction of the court's ruling in each case. This case's ruling was categorized as liberal.
See also
- United States Supreme Court cases and courts
- Supreme Court of the United States
- History of the Supreme Court
- United States federal courts
- Ballotpedia's Robe & Gavel newsletter
External links
Footnotes