Everything you need to know about ranked-choice voting in one spot. Click to learn more!

THOMAS ELLICOTT AND JONATHAN MEREDITH, PLAINTIFFS IN ERROR v. WILLIAM PEARL (1836)

From Ballotpedia
Jump to: navigation, search

Seal of the Supreme Court of the United States
THOMAS ELLICOTT AND JONATHAN MEREDITH, PLAINTIFFS IN ERROR v. WILLIAM PEARL
Term: 1836
Important Dates
Argued: February 5, 1836
Decided: February 16, 1836
Outcome
Affirmed (includes modified)
Vote
5-0
Majority
Henry BaldwinJohn McLeanJoseph StorySmith ThompsonJames Moore Wayne

THOMAS ELLICOTT AND JONATHAN MEREDITH, PLAINTIFFS IN ERROR v. WILLIAM PEARL is a case that was decided by the Supreme Court of the United States on February 16, 1836. The case was argued before the court on February 5, 1836.

In a 5-0 ruling, the U.S. Supreme Court affirmed the ruling of the lower court. The case originated from the Kentucky U.S. Circuit for (all) District(s) of Kentucky.

For a full list of cases decided in the 1830s, click here. For a full list of cases decided by the Marshall Court, click here.

[1]

About the case

  • Subject matter: Private Action - Evidence
  • Petitioner: Owner, landlord, or claimant to ownership, fee interest, or possession of land as well as chattels
  • Petitioner state: Unknown
  • Respondent type: Owner, landlord, or claimant to ownership, fee interest, or possession of land as well as chattels
  • Respondent state: Unknown
  • Citation: 35 U.S. 412
  • How the court took jurisdiction: Writ of error
  • What type of decision was made: Opinion of the court (orally argued)
  • Who was the chief justice: John Marshall
  • Who wrote the majority opinion: Joseph Story

These data points were accessed from The Supreme Court Database, which also attempts to categorize the ideological direction of the court's ruling in each case. This case's ruling was categorized as unspecifiable.

See also

External links

Footnotes