TINA B. BENNIS v. MICHIGAN (1996)

![]() |
TINA B. BENNIS v. MICHIGAN |
---|
Term: 1995 |
Important Dates |
Argued: November 29, 1995 |
Decided: March 4, 1996 |
Outcome |
Affirmed (includes modified) |
Vote |
5-4 |
Majority |
Sandra Day O'Connor • William Rehnquist • Antonin Scalia |
Concurring |
Ruth Bader Ginsburg • Clarence Thomas |
Dissenting |
Stephen Breyer • Anthony Kennedy • David Souter • John Paul Stevens |
TINA B. BENNIS v. MICHIGAN is a case that was decided by the Supreme Court of the United States on March 4, 1996. The case was argued before the court on November 29, 1995.
In a 5-4 ruling, the U.S. Supreme Court affirmed the ruling of the lower court. The case originated from the Michigan State Trial Court.
For a full list of cases decided in the 1990s, click here. For a full list of cases decided by the Rehnquist Court, click here.
About the case
- Subject matter: Due Process - Due process: takings clause, or other non-constitutional governmental taking of property
- Petitioner: Owner, landlord, or claimant to ownership, fee interest, or possession of land as well as chattels
- Petitioner state: Unknown
- Respondent type: State
- Respondent state: Michigan
- Citation: 516 U.S. 442
- How the court took jurisdiction: Cert
- What type of decision was made: Opinion of the court (orally argued)
- Who was the chief justice: William Rehnquist
- Who wrote the majority opinion: William Rehnquist
These data points were accessed from The Supreme Court Database, which also attempts to categorize the ideological direction of the court's ruling in each case. This case's ruling was categorized as conservative.
See also
- United States Supreme Court cases and courts
- Supreme Court of the United States
- History of the Supreme Court
- United States federal courts
- Ballotpedia's Robe & Gavel newsletter
External links
Footnotes