Your monthly support provides voters the knowledge they need to make confident decisions at the polls. Donate today.
TRINOVA CORPORATION v. MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF TREASURY (1991)

![]() |
TRINOVA CORPORATION v. MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF TREASURY |
---|
Term: 1990 |
Important Dates |
Argued: October 1, 1990 |
Decided: February 19, 1991 |
Outcome |
Affirmed (includes modified) |
Vote |
6-2 |
Majority |
Anthony Kennedy • Thurgood Marshall • Sandra Day O'Connor • William Rehnquist • Byron White |
Concurring |
Antonin Scalia |
Dissenting |
Harry Blackmun • John Paul Stevens |
TRINOVA CORPORATION v. MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF TREASURY is a case that was decided by the Supreme Court of the United States on February 19, 1991. The case was argued before the court on October 1, 1990.
In a 6-2 ruling, the U.S. Supreme Court affirmed the ruling of the lower court. The case originated from the Michigan State Trial Court.
For a full list of cases decided in the 1990s, click here. For a full list of cases decided by the Rehnquist Court, click here.
About the case
- Subject matter: Economic Activity - state or local government tax
- Petitioner: State or local governmental taxpayer, or executor of the estate of
- Petitioner state: Michigan
- Respondent type: State department or agency
- Respondent state: Michigan
- Citation: 498 U.S. 358
- How the court took jurisdiction: Cert
- What type of decision was made: Opinion of the court (orally argued)
- Who was the chief justice: William Rehnquist
- Who wrote the majority opinion: Anthony Kennedy
These data points were accessed from The Supreme Court Database, which also attempts to categorize the ideological direction of the court's ruling in each case. This case's ruling was categorized as liberal.
See also
- United States Supreme Court cases and courts
- Supreme Court of the United States
- History of the Supreme Court
- United States federal courts
- Ballotpedia's Robe & Gavel newsletter
External links
Footnotes