Become part of the movement for unbiased, accessible election information. Donate today.

Tennessee Constitutional Amendment 3, Remove Slavery as Punishment for Crime from Constitution Amendment (2022)

From Ballotpedia
Jump to: navigation, search
Tennessee Constitutional Amendment 3
Flag of Tennessee.png
Election date
November 8, 2022
Topic
Constitutional language
Status
Approveda Approved
Type
Constitutional amendment
Origin
State legislature

Tennessee Constitutional Amendment 3, the Remove Slavery as Punishment for Crime from Constitution Amendment, was on the ballot in Tennessee as a legislatively referred constitutional amendment on November 8, 2022. The measure was approved.

A "yes" vote supported amending the state constitution to remove language that allows the use of slavery and involuntary servitude as criminal punishments and replace it with the statement, "Slavery and involuntary servitude are forever prohibited."

A "no" vote opposed amending the state constitution to remove language that allows the use of slavery and involuntary servitude as criminal punishments.


Election results

Tennessee Amendment 3

Result Votes Percentage

Approved Yes

1,294,296 79.53%
No 333,071 20.47%
Results are officially certified.
Source


Overview

What did the amendment do?

See also: Text of measure

Constitutional Amendment 3 removed language from the Tennessee Constitution that allows the use of slavery and involuntary servitude as criminal punishments. The ballot measure replaced the language with the statement, "Slavery and involuntary servitude are forever prohibited." The ballot measure states that the language does not prohibit an inmate from working when the inmate has been duly convicted of a crime.[1]

Did other states have similar constitutional provisions?

See also: State constitutions

Going into the 2022 election, 10 states had constitutions that included provisions prohibiting enslavement and involuntary servitude but with an exception for criminal punishments. These constitutional provisions were added to state constitutions, in their original forms, from the 1850s to the 1890s.

At the 2020 general election, Utah and Nebraska voters decided to remove language from their respective constitutions that allowed the use of slavery and involuntary servitude as criminal punishments. Nebraska Amendment 1 was approved by a margin of 68.23% to 31.77%. Utah Constitutional Amendment C was approved by a margin of 80.48% to 19.52%.

Who supported and opposed the amendment?

See also: Support and Opposition

The amendment was sponsored by State Senator Raumesh Akbari (D). Sen. Akbari said, "Our constitution should reflect our values, and it's important that we not have any loopholes that will say in any circumstance slavery is permissible. I think it's an ugly part of our history that needs to be completely put to bed."[2]

The amendment received six "no" votes in the state legislature. Senator Joey Hensley (R), who voted against the amendment, said, "Tennessee’s Constitution has expressly prohibited slavery since it was first adopted 1870, so it’s unnecessary to add this amendment to the state constitution. It will only confuse Tennessee voters by leading them to believe slavery is allowed under the current constitution, which it is not."[2]

Text of measure

Ballot title

The official ballot title was as follows:[3]

Shall Article I, Section 33 of the Constitution of Tennessee be amended by deleting the section and substituting instead the following?


Section 33. Slavery and involuntary servitude are forever prohibited. Nothing in this section shall prohibit an inmate from working when the inmate has been duly convicted of a crime.[4]

Ballot summary

The official ballot summary was as follows:[3]

This amendment would change the current language in article I, section 33 of the Tennessee Constitution, which says that slavery and involuntary servitude, except as punishment for a person who has been duly convicted of crime, are forever prohibited in this State. The amendment would delete this current language and replace it with the following language: “Slavery and involuntary servitude are forever prohibited. Nothing in this section shall prohibit an inmate from working when the inmate has been duly convicted of a crime.”[4]

Constitutional changes

See also: Article I, Tennessee Constitution

The measure repealed and replaced Section 33 of Article I of the Tennessee Constitution. The following underlined text was added and struck-through text was deleted:[1]

That slavery and involuntary servitude, except as a punishment for crime, whereof the party shall have been duly convicted, are forever prohibited in this state.

Slavery and involuntary servitude are forever prohibited. Nothing in this section shall prohibit an inmate from working when the inmate has been duly convicted of a crime.[4]

Full text

The full text of the measure can be found here.

Readability score

See also: Ballot measure readability scores, 2022

Using the Flesch-Kincaid Grade Level (FKGL) and Flesch Reading Ease (FRE) formulas, Ballotpedia scored the readability of the ballot title and summary for this measure. Readability scores are designed to indicate the reading difficulty of text. The Flesch-Kincaid formulas account for the number of words, syllables, and sentences in a text; they do not account for the difficulty of the ideas in the text. The state legislature wrote the ballot language for this measure.

The FKGL for the ballot title is grade level 12, and the FRE is 34. The word count for the ballot title is 48.

The FKGL for the ballot summary is grade level 16, and the FRE is 29. The word count for the ballot summary is 82.


Support

United Tennessee Yes on 3 was the committee registered in support of Constitutional Amendment 3.[5]

Supporters

Officials

Candidates

Organizations

  • Human Rights Campaign PAC

Arguments

  • State Rep. Joe Towns (D): "Today is an historic day as this state has taken a definitive step forward in stripping all forms of slavery from the Tennessee State Constitution. Some Tennesseans may be prisoners, but, by God, they will not be slaves."
  • State Sen. Raumesh Akbari (D): "Our constitution should reflect our values, and it's important that we not have any loopholes that will say in any circumstance slavery is permissible. I think it's an ugly part of our history that needs to be completely put to bed."
  • Bishop Phoebe Roaf, Bishop of West Tennessee, Bishop John Bauerschmidt, Bishop of Tennessee, and Bishop Brian L. Cole, Bishop of East Tennessee: "It is our Christian faith that motivates us to support Amendment 3, believing that slavery and involuntary servitude have no place in our state."
  • Jason Martin, 2022 gubernatorial candidate: "Voting Yes on 3 is about righting a wrong. When passed, Amendment 3 will remove slavery as a punishment from the Constitution of the State of Tennessee. This whole campaign is about common sense and compassion, and this is another element of that campaign. Let’s make sure we go out and vote Yes on Amendment 3."


Opposition

Opponents

Officials

Arguments

  • State Sen. Brian Kelsey (R): "I just think it's ultimately fake history to be telling our voters next year that the 1870 Constitution allowed slavery. It clearly did not, and it was passed five years after Tennessee and the United States ratified the 13th Amendment, forever prohibiting slavery. So that to me, Mr. Speaker, is fake history, and for that reason, I'll actually be voting no."
  • State Sen. Joey Hensley (R): "Tennessee’s Constitution has expressly prohibited slavery since it was first adopted 1870, so it’s unnecessary to add this amendment to the state constitution. It will only confuse Tennessee voters by leading them to believe slavery is allowed under the current constitution, which it is not."


Campaign finance

See also: Campaign finance requirements for Tennessee ballot measures
The campaign finance information on this page reflects the most recent scheduled reports that Ballotpedia has processed, which covered through December 31, 2022.


United Tennessee Yes on 3 and Yes on Three Tennessee were the organizations registered in support of Amendment 3. They have reported $204,058 in contributions.[6]

Cash Contributions In-Kind Contributions Total Contributions Cash Expenditures Total Expenditures
Support $126,780.79 $77,277.60 $204,058.39 $158,259.64 $235,537.24
Oppose $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00
Total $126,780.79 $77,277.60 $77,302.60 $158,259.64 $235,537.24

Support

The following table includes contribution and expenditure totals for the committees in support of the measure.

Committees in support of Amendment 3
Committee Cash Contributions In-Kind Contributions Total Contributions Cash Expenditures Total Expenditures
United Tennessee $126,755.79 $0.00 $126,755.79 $80,957.04 $80,957.04
Yes on Three Tennessee $25.00 $77,277.60 $77,302.60 $77,302.60 $154,580.20
Total $126,780.79 $77,277.60 $204,058.39 $158,259.64 $235,537.24

Background

Related ballot measures

In 2020, voters in Nebraska and Utah voted to remove language from their respective constitutions that allowed the use of slavery and involuntary servitude as criminal punishments. Nebraska Amendment 1 was approved by a margin of 68.23% to 31.77%. Utah Constitutional Amendment C was approved by a margin of 80.48% to 19.52%.

In 2018, voters in Colorado approved Amendment A, which removed language from the state constitution saying that slavery and involuntary servitude were permitted as criminal punishments. Amendment A received 66.2% of the vote. In 2016, voters in Colorado rejected a constitutional amendment—Amendment T—that would have removed the same language as Amendment A. Amendment T received 49.7% of the vote.

Federal constitution

See also: Amendment XIII, United States Constitution

The Thirteenth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution was ratified on December 6, 1865. Like the Tennessee Constitution, the Thirteenth Amendment prohibited slavery and involuntary servitude, except as a punishment for those convicted of crimes. The text of the Thirteenth Amendment is as follows:

1. Neither slavery nor involuntary servitude, except as a punishment for crime whereof the party shall have been duly convicted, shall exist within the United States, or any place subject to their jurisdiction.

2. Congress shall have power to enforce this article by appropriate legislation.

State constitutions

Slavery as criminal punishment

As of 2024, eight states had constitutions that included provisions prohibiting enslavement and involuntary servitude but with an exception for criminal punishments. These constitutional provisions were added to state constitutions, in their original forms, from the 1850s to the 1890s.

State Constitution Language
Arkansas Article II, Section 27 "There shall be no slavery in this State, nor involuntary servitude, except as a punishment for crime."
Indiana Article I, Section 37 "There shall be neither slavery, nor involuntary servitude, within the State, otherwise than for the punishment of crimes, whereof the party shall have been duly convicted."
Kentucky Article I, Section 25 "Slavery and involuntary servitude in this State are forbidden, except as a punishment for crime, whereof the party shall have been duly convicted."
Minnesota Article I, Section 2 "There shall be neither slavery nor involuntary servitude in the state otherwise than as punishment for a crime of which the party has been convicted."
Mississippi Article III, Section 15 "There shall be neither slavery nor involuntary servitude in this state, otherwise than in the punishment of crime, whereof the party shall have been duly convicted."
Nevada Article I, Section 17 "Neither Slavery nor involuntary servitude unless for the punishment of crimes shall ever be tolerated in this State."
North Dakota Article I, Section 6 "Neither slavery nor involuntary servitude, unless for the punishment of crime, shall ever be tolerated in this state."
Wisconsin Article I, Section 2 "There shall be neither slavery, nor involuntary servitude in this state, otherwise than for the punishment of crime, whereof the party shall have been duly convicted."

Involuntary servitude as criminal punishment

As of 2023, eight states had constitutions that included provisions permitting involuntary servitude, but not slavery, as a criminal punishment.

State Constitution Language
California Article I, Section 6 "Slavery is prohibited. Involuntary servitude is prohibited except to punish crime."
Georgia Article I, Paragraph XX "There shall be no involuntary servitude within the State of Georgia except as a punishment for crime after legal conviction thereof or for contempt of court."
Iowa Article I, Section 23 "There shall be no slavery in this state; nor shall there be involuntary servitude, unless for the punishment of crime."
Kansas Bill of Rights, Section 6 "There shall be no slavery in this state; and no involuntary servitude, except for the punishment of crime, whereof the party shall have been duly convicted."
Louisiana Article I, Section 3 "Slavery and involuntary servitude are prohibited, except in the latter case as punishment for crime."
Michigan Article I, Section 9 "Neither slavery, nor involuntary servitude unless for the punishment of crime, shall ever be tolerated in this state."
North Carolina Article I, Section 17 "Slavery is forever prohibited. Involuntary servitude, except as a punishment for crime whereof the parties have been adjudged guilty, is forever prohibited."
Ohio Article I, Section 6 "There shall be no slavery in this state; nor involuntary servitude, unless for the punishment of crime."

Path to the ballot

See also: Amending the Tennessee Constitution

In Tennessee, a constitutional amendment requires a vote in each chamber of the Tennessee State Legislature in two successive legislative sessions with an election in between. However, there are two different vote requirements depending on the session. During the first legislative session, the constitutional amendment needs to receive a simple majority (50%+1) vote in each legislative chamber. During the second legislative session, the constitutional amendment needs to receive a two-thirds vote in each legislative chamber.

111th General Assembly

The 111th Tennessee General Assembly was seated in 2019 and 2020. Sen. Raumesh Akbari (D-29) introduced the constitutional amendment into the legislature as Senate Joint Resolution 159 (SJR 159) on February 5, 2019.[1]

On March 25, 2019, the state Senate approved SJR 159, in a vote of 32-0.[1]

On April 22, 2019, the state House approved SJR 159, in a vote of 97-0.[1]

Vote in the Tennessee State Senate
March 25, 2019
Requirement: Approval in two legislative sessions is required; a simple majority vote of all members in each chamber in the first and a two-thirds (66.67 percent) vote of all members in each chamber in the second
Number of yes votes required: 17  Approveda
YesNoNot voting
Total3200
Total percent100.00%0.00%0.00%
Democrat400
Republican2700
Independent100

Vote in the Tennessee House of Representatives
April 22, 2019
Requirement: Approval in two legislative sessions is required; a simple majority vote of all members in each chamber in the first and a two-thirds (66.67 percent) vote of all members in each chamber in the second
Number of yes votes required: 50  Approveda
YesNoNot voting
Total9700
Total percent100.00%0.00%0.00%
Democrat2600
Republican7100

112th General Assembly

As the constitutional amendment was approved as SJR 159 in 2019, the 112th Tennessee General Assembly needed to approve the amendment for the measure to appear on the ballot. The amendment was introduced during the 2021 legislative session as Senate Joint Resolution 80 (SJR 80). The Senate approved SJR 80 on March 15, 2021, in a vote of 26-4. On May 4, 2021, the House approved SJR 80 in a vote of 81-2, with two present and not voting.[7]

Vote in the Tennessee State Senate
March 15, 2021
Requirement: Approval in two legislative sessions is required; a simple majority vote of all members in each chamber in the first and a two-thirds (66.67 percent) vote of all members in each chamber in the second
Number of yes votes required: 22  Approveda
YesNoNot voting
Total2640
Total percent86.67%13.3%0.0%
Democrat500
Republican2140

Vote in the Tennessee House of Representatives
May 4, 2021
Requirement: Approval in two legislative sessions is required; a simple majority vote of all members in each chamber in the first and a two-thirds (66.67 percent) vote of all members in each chamber in the second
Number of yes votes required: 66  Approveda
YesNoNot voting
Total8122
Total percent95.30%2.35%2.35%
Democrat2400
Republican5722

How to cast a vote

See also: Voting in Tennessee

Click "Show" to learn more about voter registration, identification requirements, and poll times in Tennessee.

See also

External links

Footnotes

  1. 1.0 1.1 1.2 1.3 1.4 Tennessee State Legislature, "SJR 159," accessed April 23, 2019
  2. 2.0 2.1 Fox 17, "4 Tennessee senators vote against removing slavery as punishment from State Constitution," March 16, 2021
  3. 3.0 3.1 Tennessee Secretary of State, "2022 Proposed Constitutional Amendments," accessed July 22, 2022
  4. 4.0 4.1 4.2 4.3 Note: This text is quoted verbatim from the original source. Any inconsistencies are attributable to the original source. Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "quotedisclaimer" defined multiple times with different content Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "quotedisclaimer" defined multiple times with different content
  5. Vote Yes on 3, "Homepage," accessed Oct 11, 2022
  6. Tennessee BECF, "Registered Referendum Committees 2022," accessed Oct 18, 2022
  7. Tennessee General Assembly, "Senate Joint Resolution 80," accessed May 5, 2021
  8. LexisNexis, "Tenn. Code Ann. § 2-3-201," accessed July 15, 2025
  9. LexisNexis, "Tenn. Code Ann. § 2-7-127," accessed July 15, 2025
  10. 10.0 10.1 10.2 Tennessee Secretary of State, "Register to Vote," accessed July 15, 2025
  11. National Conference of State Legislatures, "Automatic Voter Registration," accessed July 15, 2025
  12. National Conference of State Legislatures, "Same-Day Voter Registration," accessed July 15, 2025
  13. Tennessee Secretary of State, "Tennessee Mail-In Application For Voter Registration," accessed July 15, 2025
  14. LexisNexis, “Tenn. Code Ann. § 2-2-141,” accessed July 15, 2025
  15. Under federal law, the national mail voter registration application (a version of which is in use in all states with voter registration systems) requires applicants to indicate that they are U.S. citizens in order to complete an application to vote in state or federal elections, but does not require voters to provide documentary proof of citizenship. According to the U.S. Department of Justice, the application "may require only the minimum amount of information necessary to prevent duplicate voter registrations and permit State officials both to determine the eligibility of the applicant to vote and to administer the voting process."
  16. 16.0 16.1 Tennessee Secretary of State, "What ID is required when voting?" accessed July 16, 2025
  17. 17.0 17.1 17.2 Tennessee Secretary of State, "Guide on ID Requirements when voting," accessed July 16, 2025