Help us improve in just 2 minutes—share your thoughts in our reader survey.

Texas Proposition 2, Increased Homestead Exemption for School District Property Taxes Amendment (May 2022)

From Ballotpedia
Jump to: navigation, search
Texas Proposition 2
Flag of Texas.png
Election date
May 7, 2022
Topic
Taxes
Status
Approveda Approved
Type
Constitutional amendment
Origin
State legislature

Texas Proposition 2, the Increased Homestead Exemption for School District Property Taxes Amendment, was on the ballot in Texas as a legislatively referred constitutional amendment on May 7, 2022. It was approved.[1][2]

A "yes" vote supported increasing the homestead exemption for school district property taxes from $25,000 to $40,000.

A "no" vote opposed increasing the homestead exemption for school district property taxes to $40,000, thereby maintaining the existing amount at $25,000.


Election results

Texas Proposition 2

Result Votes Percentage

Approved Yes

1,112,961 84.95%
No 197,120 15.05%
Results are officially certified.
Source


Overview

What did Proposition 2 change about homestead exemptions?

See also: Text of measure

Proposition 2 increased the homestead exemption for school district property taxes from $25,000 to $40,000. The increased exemption was designed to take effect on January 1, 2022, and applies only to a tax year beginning on or after that date. The Legislative Budget Board estimated that the increase would cost $355 million in fiscal year 2023.[2][3]

Voters last increased the exemption in 2015 with the passage of Proposition 1, which increased it from $15,000 to $25,000.

Who supported and opposed the amendment?

See also: Support and Opposition

State Senator Paul Bettencourt (R), who sponsored the amendment, said "People see the need for property tax relief, and Texans are going to cry out for that continuously. This is a great way to bring that home to all of the taxpayers of Texas."[4]

The measure also received bipartisan support. State Senator José Menéndez (D) said that increasing the homestead tax exemption was "the most progressive way" to provide long-term tax relief to property owners.[5]

Opposing the amendment, Ross Ramsey, executive editor and co-founder of The Texas Tribune said, "[T]he homeowner’s exemption increase is expensive: It would cost the state almost $2 billion over the next five years. ... It’s a straight-up bid for homeowners who vote. It doesn’t do anything for renters or for commercial and industrial property owners in the way that a cut in property tax rates would be."[6]

Have Texans increased the homestead exemption in the past?

See also: Homestead exemption increases in Texas

Ballotpedia tracked two homestead exemptions passed in Texas since 1997. In 2015, Texas voters approved Proposition 1, which increased the homestead exemption from $15,000 to $25,000. Prior to that, Texas voters had last increased the exemption in 1997 with the passage of Proposition 1, which increased the homestead exemption from $5,000 to $15,000.

Text of measure

Ballot title

The ballot title was as follows:[2]

The constitutional amendment increasing the amount of the residence homestead exemption from ad valorem taxation for public school purposes from $25,000 to $40,000.[7]

Constitutional changes

See also: Article 8, Texas Constitution

Proposition 2 amended section 1-b(C) of Article 8 of the state constitution. The following underlined text was added:[2] Note: Hover over the text and scroll to see the full text.

(c)The amount of $40,000 $25,000 of the market value of the residence homestead of a married or unmarried adult, including one living alone, is exempt from ad valorem taxation for general elementary and secondary public school purposes. The legislature by general law may provide that all or part of the exemption does not apply to a district or political subdivision that imposes ad valorem taxes for public education purposes but is not the principal school district providing general elementary and secondary public education throughout its territory. In addition to this exemption, the legislature by general law may exempt an amount not to exceed $10,000 of the market value of the residence homestead of a person who is disabled as defined in Subsection (b) of this section and of a person 65 years of age or older from ad valorem taxation for general elementary and secondary public school purposes. The legislature by general law may base the amount of and condition eligibility for the additional exemption authorized by this subsection for disabled persons and for persons 65 years of age or older on economic need. An eligible disabled person who is 65 years of age or older may not receive both exemptions from a school district but may choose either. An eligible person is entitled to receive both the exemption required by this subsection for all residence homesteads and any exemption adopted pursuant to Subsection (b) of this section, but the legislature shall provide by general law whether an eligible disabled or elderly person may receive both the additional exemption for the elderly and disabled authorized by this subsection and any exemption for the elderly or disabled adopted pursuant to Subsection (b) of this section. Where ad valorem tax has previously been pledged for the payment of debt, the taxing officers of a school district may continue to levy and collect the tax against the value of homesteads exempted under this subsection until the debt is discharged if the cessation of the levy would impair the obligation of the contract by which the debt was created. The legislature shall provide for formulas to protect school districts against all or part of the revenue loss incurred by the implementation of this subsection, Subsection (d) of this section, and Section 1-d-1 of this article. The legislature by general law may define residence homestead for purposes of this section.

TEMPORARY PROVISION. (a) This temporary provision applies to the constitutional amendment proposed by the 87th Legislature, 3rd Called Session, 2021, increasing the amount of the residence homestead exemption from ad valorem taxation for public school purposes.

(b) The amendment to Section 1-b(c), Article VIII, of this constitution takes effect January 1, 2022, and applies only to a tax year beginning on or after that date.

(c)This temporary provision expires January 1, 2023.[7]

Full text

The full text of the amendment can be read here.

Readability score

See also: Ballot measure readability scores, 2022

Using the Flesch-Kincaid Grade Level (FKGL) and Flesch Reading Ease (FRE) formulas, Ballotpedia scored the readability of the ballot title for this measure. Readability scores are designed to indicate the reading difficulty of text. The Flesch-Kincaid formulas account for the number of words, syllables, and sentences in a text; they do not account for the difficulty of the ideas in the text. The state legislature wrote the ballot language for this measure.

The FKGL for the ballot title is grade level 17, and the FRE is 12. The word count for the ballot title is 21.


Support

State Senator Paul Bettencourt was the author of the amendment.[1]

Supporters

Officials

Organizations

  • Texas Public Policy Foundation
  • Texas Taxpayers and Research Association

Arguments

  • State Senator Paul Bettencourt (R): "People see the need for property tax relief, and Texans are going to cry out for that continuously. This is a great way to bring that home to all of the taxpayers of Texas."
  • Lt. Gov. Dan Patrick (R) and House Speaker Dade Phelan (R): In a joint statement, Patrick and Phelan said, "The increase in the homestead exemption will save every homeowner $175 per year over the lifetime of their home, which will total in the thousands in tax savings."
  • State Senator José Menéndez (D): Menéndez said that increasing the homestead tax exemption was "the most progressive way" to provide long-term tax relief to property owners.
  • State Sen. Lois Kolkhorst (R): "The additional proposal, Proposition 2, is much shorter and easy to understand. It proposes an increase in the residence homestead exemption from property taxes for public school purposes from $25,000 to $40,000. This is a badly needed adjustment and I was proud to also co-author this legislation with Sen. Bettencourt last year."


Opposition

Ballotpedia did not locate a campaign in opposition to the ballot measure.

Arguments

  • Ross Ramsey, executive editor and co-founder of The Texas Tribune: "[T]he homeowner’s exemption increase is expensive: It would cost the state almost $2 billion over the next five years. ... It’s a straight-up bid for homeowners who vote. It doesn’t do anything for renters or for commercial and industrial property owners in the way that a cut in property tax rates would be."


Campaign finance

See also: Campaign finance requirements for Texas ballot measures

If you are aware of a committee registered to support or oppose this amendment, please email editor@ballotpedia.org.

Cash Contributions In-Kind Contributions Total Contributions Cash Expenditures Total Expenditures
Support $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00
Oppose $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00
Total $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00

Media editorials

See also: 2022 ballot measure media endorsements

Ballotpedia identified the following media editorial boards as taking positions on Proposition 2.

Ballotpedia lists the positions of media editorial boards that support or oppose ballot measures. This does not include opinion pieces from individuals or groups that do not represent the official position of a newspaper or media outlet. Ballotpedia includes editorials from newspapers and outlets based on circulation and readership, political coverage within a state, and length of publication. You can share media editorial board endorsements with us at editor@ballotpedia.org.

Support

  • Dallas Morning News Editorial Board: "Two constitutional amendments on the May 7 ballot are designed to take the financial bite out of rising school district property taxes. We recommend a yes vote on both amendments."
  • Fort Worth Star-Telegram Editorial Board: "This proposal is also a modest effort to ease the blow of property taxes. It would increase the homestead exemption for school taxes from $25,000 to $40,000, meaning less of the value of a home would be taxed. Recommendation: Yes."
  • The San Antonio Express-News Editorial Board: "For: Proposition 2 would increase from $25,000 to $40,000 the residence homestead exemption from ad valorem taxes for public school purposes."

Opposition

  • The Austin Chronicle Editorial Board: Against: "Prop 2 is much more straightforward but is also just straight-up pandering. It's almost guaranteed to pass now that everyone's seen their new tax appraisals, but increasing the school district homestead exemption (from $25,000 to $40,000) is the coward's way out of broad-based tax relief: Schools really need that money, and in many cases, this simply shifts the burden to renters."


Background

Enabling Legislation: Senate Bill 1

During the third special legislative session of 2021, the Texas State Legislature passed Senate Bill 1 (SB 1) as the enabling legislation for the amendment. On October 18, 2021, it was approved by the Senate in a vote of 31-0, and it was approved by the House in a vote of 146-0 with three not voting or absent.[8]

SB 1 increased the homestead exemption from $25,000 to $40,000 in state statute. It also provides that school districts are entitled to additional state aid to cover the loss of local revenue to service eligible debt.[9]

Homestead exemption increases in Texas

See also: Proposition 1 (2015) and Proposition 1 (1997)

Ballotpedia tracked two homestead exemptions passed in Texas since 1997. In 2015, Texas voters approved Proposition 1, which increased the homestead exemption from $15,000 to $25,000. It was approved by a vote of 86.38% to 13.62%. Prior to that, Texas voters had last increased the exemption in 1997 with the passage of Proposition 1, which increased the homestead exemption from $5,000 to $15,000. It was approved by a vote of 93.83% to 6.17%.

Even-year ballot measure elections in Texas

Between 1985 and 2021, Ballotpedia tracked 10 measures on even-numbered year ballots in Texas. All 10 measures were approved. During that same period, Texas voters decided 251 ballot measures on odd-numbered year elections. Of that total, 219 measures were approved, and 32 measures were defeated.

Path to the ballot

See also: Amending the Texas Constitution

To put a legislatively referred constitutional amendment before voters, a two-thirds vote is required in both the Texas State Senate and the Texas House of Representatives.

Proposition 2 was introduced as Senate Joint Resolution 2 (SJR 2) on October 18, 2021. That day the state Senate passed SJR 2 unanimously in a vote of 31-0, and the state House passed SJR 2 by a vote of 147-0 with two absent.[1]

Vote in the Texas State Senate
October 18, 2021
Requirement: Two-thirds (66.67 percent) vote of all members in each chamber
Number of yes votes required: 21  Approveda
YesNoNot voting
Total3100
Total percent100.0%0.0%0.0%
Democrat1300
Republican1800

Vote in the Texas House of Representatives
October 18, 2021
Requirement: Two-thirds (66.67 percent) vote of all members in each chamber
Number of yes votes required: 100  Approveda
YesNoNot voting
Total14702
Total percent98.6%0.0%1.4%
Democrat6402
Republican8300

How to cast a vote

See also: Voting in Texas

Click "Show" to learn more about voter registration, identification requirements, and poll times in Texas.

See also

External links

Footnotes

  1. 1.0 1.1 1.2 Texas State Legislature, "Overview of SJR 2," accessed October 18, 2021
  2. 2.0 2.1 2.2 2.3 Texas State Legislature, "Senate Joint Resolution 2," accessed October 18, 2021
  3. Texas State Legislature, "Fiscal impact statement," accessed October 19, 2021
  4. Texas Tribune, "Texas voters will decide whether to lower their property tax payments after Legislature completes last-minute Hail Mary," accessed January 28, 2022
  5. Houston Chronicle, "Texas Legislature votes to raise homestead," accessed January 28, 2022
  6. Texas Tribune, "Texas Property Taxes," October 22, 2021
  7. 7.0 7.1 7.2 Note: This text is quoted verbatim from the original source. Any inconsistencies are attributable to the original source. Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "quotedisclaimer" defined multiple times with different content Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "quotedisclaimer" defined multiple times with different content
  8. Texas State Legislature, "Senate Bill (2021)," accessed January 26, 2022
  9. Texas State Legislature, "Senate Bill (2021)," accessed January 26, 2022
  10. VoteTexas.gov, "Who, What, Where, When, How," accessed February 27, 2023
  11. Texas Secretary of State, “Request for Voter Registration Applications,” accessed February 27, 2023
  12. Texas Secretary of State, “Voter Registration,” accessed February 27, 2023
  13. 13.0 13.1 13.2 NCSL, "State Profiles: Elections," accessed July 28, 2024
  14. Texas Secretary of State, "Request for Voter Registration Applications," accessed July 28, 2024
  15. Texas Constitution and Statutes, “Election Code,” accessed February 23, 2023
  16. The Texas Tribune, “Texas officials flag tens of thousands of voters for citizenship checks,” January 25, 2019
  17. The New York Times, “Federal Judge Halts ‘Ham-Handed’ Texas Voter Purge,” February 28, 2019
  18. The New York Times, “Texas Ends Review That Questioned Citizenship of Almost 100,000 Voters,” April 26, 2019
  19. Texas Secretary of State, “Secretary Whitley Announces Settlement In Litigation On Voter Registration List Maintenance Activity,” April 26, 2019
  20. Under federal law, the national mail voter registration application (a version of which is in use in all states with voter registration systems) requires applicants to indicate that they are U.S. citizens in order to complete an application to vote in state or federal elections, but does not require voters to provide documentary proof of citizenship. According to the U.S. Department of Justice, the application "may require only the minimum amount of information necessary to prevent duplicate voter registrations and permit State officials both to determine the eligibility of the applicant to vote and to administer the voting process."
  21. 21.0 21.1 21.2 21.3 21.4 Texas Secretary of State, "Required Identification for Voting in Person," accessed February 27, 2023 Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "tvid" defined multiple times with different content