Thad Balkman

From Ballotpedia
Jump to: navigation, search
BP-Initials-UPDATED.png
This page was last updated during the official's most recent election or appointment. Please contact us with any updates.
Thad Balkman
Image of Thad Balkman
Oklahoma Judicial District 21
Tenure

2013 - Present

Term ends

2023

Years in position

12

Elections and appointments
Last elected

November 6, 2018

Appointed

2013

Education

Bachelor's

Brigham Young University, 1994

Law

University of Oklahoma School of Law, 1998

Personal
Religion
The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints (Mormon)

Thad Balkman is a judge of the Oklahoma Judicial District 21. He assumed office in 2013. His term ended in 2023.

Balkman won re-election for judge of the Oklahoma Judicial District 21 outright after the general election on November 6, 2018, was canceled.

[1][2]

Elections

2018

See also: Municipal elections in Cleveland County, Oklahoma (2018)

General election

The general election was canceled. Thad Balkman (Nonpartisan) won without appearing on the ballot.

2014

See also: Oklahoma judicial elections, 2014

Balkman ran for re-election to the 21st District Court. As an unopposed candidate, he was automatically re-elected without appearing on the ballot.[2] 

Education

Balkman earned a B.A. in political science from Brigham Young University in 1994, and a J.D. from Oklahoma University School of Law in 1998.[3]

Career

  • 2013-present: Judge, District 21 Court
  • 2009-2013: Consultant & lobbyist, Oklahoma Lawyers Association
  • 2007-2009: General counsel & VP External Relations, Phoenix Motorcars
  • 2007-2008: Executive Director, Oklahoma 100 Ideas Initiative
  • 2007-2008: Oklahoma Political Director, Mitt Romney for President
  • 2005-2007: Attorney, Thad H. Balkman Law Office
  • 2004-2006: Attorney, Carr & Carr
  • 2002-2004: Attorney, Lee, Wells & Balkman
  • 2001-2002: General counsel, Association of Professional Oklahoma Educators
  • 2000-2006: Oklahoma State Representative
  • 1998-2001: Associate attorney, Stanley M. Ward Law Office[4][5]

Campaign themes

2018

Ballotpedia survey responses

See also: Ballotpedia's candidate surveys
Candidate Connection

Thad Balkman participated in Ballotpedia's candidate survey on February 28, 2018. The survey questions appear in bold, and Thad Balkman's responses follow below.[6]

What would be your top three priorities, if elected?

1) Uphold the Constitution

2) Provide justice for all
3) Adjudicate cases in a timely manner[7][8]

What areas of public policy are you personally passionate about? Why?

Separation of powers, due process and innovation in the delivery of government services.Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; invalid names, e.g. too many[8]

Ballotpedia also asked the candidate a series of optional questions. Thad Balkman answered the following:

Who do you look up to? Whose example would you like to follow, and why?

Atticus Finch and Supreme Court Justice Neil Gorsuch[8]
What is your favorite book? Why?
To Kill a Mockingbird[8]

Approach to the law

Balkman was quoted in The Moore American:

I’m hopeful as I grow in this position, that I will be in the position to help people who have made some bad choices and help them through the course of the law where they can become productive citizens again. That doesn’t always mean that you are going to go easy on them or be tough on them, that’s the challenge I face as a judge, what is the best course of action for this person.[9][8]

Awards and associations

  • President, Oklahoma Judicial Conference (2018)
  • President, Oklahoma Judges Association (2018)
  • Member, Oklahoma Supreme Court Committee for Uniform Civil Jury Instructions
  • Member, Executive Committee and Legislative Committee, Oklahoma Judicial Conference
  • Member, Executive Committee, Oklahoma Judges Association[10][11]

Noteworthy cases

Judge rules Johnson & Johnson must pay fine for promoting opioids in Oklahoma

On August 26, 2019, Judge Thad Balkman ruled against Johnson & Johnson and its pharmaceutical division Janssen in a lawsuit the State of Oklahoma brought against the company. The judge ordered Johnson & Johnson to pay $572 million in fines, which would cover one year of the state's plan to help those affected by opioid addiction.[12]

In his ruling, Balkman stated, “[T]he state met its burden that the defendants Janssen and Johnson & Johnson’s misleading marketing and promotion of opioids created a nuisance as defined by [the law] (...) Specifically, defendants caused an opioid crisis that’s evidenced by increased rates of addiction, overdose deaths and neonatal abstinence syndrome.”[12][13]

Johnson & Johnson planned to appeal the judge's decision. “Janssen did not cause the opioid crisis in Oklahoma, and neither the facts nor the law support this outcome,” said Johnson & Johnson general counsel Michael Ullmann. “We recognize the opioid crisis is a tremendously complex public health issue and we have deep sympathy for everyone affected. We are working with partners to find ways to help those in need.”[12]

See also

External links

Footnotes