Become part of the movement for unbiased, accessible election information. Donate today.
The Federal Judicial Vacancy Count 1/1/2023
January 1, 2023
Welcome to the Federal Vacancy Count for January 1, 2023! The Federal Vacancy Count tracks vacancies, nominations, and confirmations to all United States Article III federal courts.
This month's edition covers activity from December 2, 2022, through January 1, 2023, and compares Article III judicial appointments over time by president and by court type.[1]
What's a vacancy?
A vacancy occurs when a judge resigns, retires, takes senior status, or dies. Article III judges refer to judges who serve on courts authorized by Article III of the Constitution, which created and enumerated the powers of the judiciary. Article III judges are appointed for life terms. Unless a judge is impeached and removed from office—something that has occurred eight times in the history of the federal judiciary—it is the judge's decision how long they remain on the court. When judges decide to leave active duty, they may either retire completely from the court or take senior status.
To take senior status, judges must meet certain age and service requirements. Senior status is a classification for federal judges at all levels who are semi-retired. Senior judges continue to serve on federal courts while hearing a reduced number of cases. Both a decision to retire and a decision to take senior status trigger a vacancy.
The Constitution prescribes the process of filling a vacancy. The president nominates a candidate, who then must be confirmed by the United States Senate. There are multiple steps to the process:
- The president nominates an individual for a judicial seat.
- The Senate Judiciary Committee holds a hearing with the nominee.
- After the hearing, the Senate Judiciary Committee votes to approve or return the nominee.
- If approved, the Senate holds a vote on the candidate.
For more information on this process, click here.
Vacancy count for January 1, 2023
The vacancy level was yellow in December 2022. The total vacancy percentage was 9.5 percent, and there were 83 vacancies out of 870 Article III judicial positions.
A breakdown of the vacancies at each level can be found in the table below. For a more detailed look at the vacancies on the federal courts, click here.
Key: | |
(Numbers indicate % of seats vacant.) | |
0% | 1%-9% |
10%-24% | 25%-40% |
More than 40% |
Though the United States territorial courts are named as district courts, they are not Article III courts. They are created in accordance with the power granted under Article IV of the U.S. Constitution. Click here for more information.
New vacancies
Four judges left active status, and one judicial position was established, creating an Article III life-term judicial vacancy, since the previous vacancy count. As Article III judicial positions, vacancies must be filled by a nomination from the president. Nominations are subject to confirmation on the advice and consent of the U.S. Senate.
- A new judicial position was established on the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois
- Judge Paul Grimm assumed senior status on the U.S. District Court for the District of Maryland
- Judge Gary Feinerman retired from the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois
- Judge Sandra Lea Lynch assumed senior status on the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 1st Circuit
- Judge Carl Barbier assumed senior status on the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana
U.S. Court of Appeals vacancies
Chart
The following chart tracks the number of vacancies on the United States Court of Appeals from the inauguration of President Joe Biden (D) to January 1, 2023.
Maps
The following maps show the number of vacancies on the United States Court of Appeals at the inauguration of President Joe Biden (D) and as of December 1, 2022.
U.S. District Court vacancies
The following map shows the number of vacancies in the United States District Courts as of January 1, 2023.
New nominations
President Joe Biden (D) announced six new nominations since the previous report. On December 21, 2022, the president announced his intent to nominate the following individuals:
- Matthew Brookman to the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Indiana
- Michael Farbiarz to the U.S. District Court for the District of New Jersey
- Marian Gaston to the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of California
- Wesley Hsu to the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California
- Robert Kirsch to the U.S. District Court for the District of New Jersey
- Mónica Ramírez Almadani to the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California
Since taking office in January 2021, Biden has nominated 148 individuals to Article III positions.
New confirmations
There have been 10 new confirmations since the previous report:
- Doris Pryor to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 7th Circuit
- Frances Kay Behm to the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan
- Kelley Hodge to the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania
- Jerry Blackwell to the U.S. District Court for the District of Minnesota
- Kai Scott to the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania
- Mia Roberts Perez to the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania
- John Frank Murphy to the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania
- Jeffery P. Hopkins to the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Ohio
- Tamika Montgomery-Reeves to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 3rd Circuit
- Dana Douglas to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 5th Circuit
As of January 1, 2023, the Senate had confirmed 97 of President Biden's Article III judicial nominees—68 district court judges, 28 appeals court judges, and one Supreme Court justice—since his inauguration on January 20, 2021. To review a complete list of Biden's confirmed nominees, click here.
Comparison of Article III judicial appointments over time by president
The chart below details the number of Article III judicial appointments during each president's first term at four specific dates: end of first year in office, end of second year, January 1 of the third year, and end of the fourth year. It includes Presidents Ronald Reagan (R) through Joe Biden (D).
- The average number of judicial appointees per president through January 1 of the third year is 90.
- President Bill Clinton (D) made the most appointments through January 1 of his third year with 128. President Barack Obama (D) made the fewest with 62.
- President Donald Trump (R) made the most appointments through four years with 234. President Ronald Reagan (R) made the fewest through four years with 166.
- President Ronald Reagan (R) made the most appointments through one year in office with 41. President Barack Obama (D) made the fewest with 13.
- President Bill Clinton (D) made the most appointments through two years with 128. President Barack Obama (D) made the fewest with 62.
Comparison of Article III judicial appointments over time by president and court type
The chart below shows the number of Article III judges confirmed by the U.S. Senate under each of the last seven presidents as of January 1 of their third year in office. The confirmations are broken up by court type.
- The median number of Supreme Court appointees is one. Three presidents (Reagan, H.W. Bush, and Biden) made one appointment. Three presidents, Bill Clinton, Barack Obama, and Donald Trump, made two. George W. Bush did not appoint any SCOTUS justices by this point in his presidency.
- The median number of United States Court of Appeals appointees is 19. President Trump had the most appointees with 30. President Obama appointed the fewest with 16.
- The median number of United States District Court appointees is 68. President Clinton had the most appointees with 107. President Obama appointed the fewest with 44.
See also
- United States federal courts
- Current federal judicial vacancies
- Judicial vacancies during the Biden administration
- The Biden administration on federal courts
Footnotes
|