Help us improve in just 2 minutes—share your thoughts in our reader survey.
The Federal Judicial Vacancy Count 1/1/2025
January 1, 2025
Welcome to the Federal Vacancy Count for January 1, 2025! The Federal Vacancy Count tracks vacancies, nominations, and confirmations to all United States Article III federal courts.
This month's edition covers activity from December 2, 2024, through January 1, 2025, and compares Article III judicial appointments over time by president and by court type through December 31 of their fourth year in office.[1]
What's a vacancy?
A vacancy occurs when a judge resigns, retires, takes senior status, or dies. Article III judges refer to judges who serve on courts authorized by Article III of the Constitution, which created and enumerated the powers of the judiciary. Article III judges are appointed for life terms. Unless a judge is impeached and removed from office—something that has occurred eight times in the history of the federal judiciary—it is the judge's decision how long they remain on the court. When judges decide to leave active duty, they may either retire completely from the court or take senior status.
To take senior status, judges must meet certain age and service requirements. Senior status is a classification for federal judges at all levels who are semi-retired. Senior judges continue to serve on federal courts while hearing a reduced number of cases. Both a decision to retire and a decision to take senior status trigger a vacancy.
The Constitution prescribes the process of filling a vacancy. The president nominates a candidate, who then must be confirmed by the United States Senate. There are multiple steps to the process:
- The president nominates an individual for a judicial seat.
- The Senate Judiciary Committee holds a hearing with the nominee.
- After the hearing, the Senate Judiciary Committee votes to approve or return the nominee.
- If approved, the Senate holds a vote on the candidate.
For more information on this process, click here.
Vacancy count for January 1, 2025
The vacancy level was in December 2024. The total vacancy percentage was 4.5 percent, and there were 39 vacancies out of 870 Article III judicial positions.
A breakdown of the vacancies at each level can be found in the table below. For a more detailed look at the vacancies on the federal courts, click here.
Key: | |
(Numbers indicate % of seats vacant.) | |
0% | 1%-9% |
10%-24% | 25%-40% |
More than 40% |
Though the United States territorial courts are named as district courts, they are not Article III courts. They are created in accordance with the power granted under Article IV of the U.S. Constitution. Click here for more information.
New vacancies
Three judges left active status, creating Article III life-term judicial vacancies. As Article III judicial positions, these vacancies must be filled by a nomination from the president. Nominations are subject to confirmation on the advice and consent of the U.S. Senate.
- Judge Loretta Copeland Biggs assumed senior status on the U.S. District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina.
- Judge Catherine Eagles assumed senior status on the U.S. District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina.
- Judge Lorna Schofield assumed senior status on the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York.
U.S. Court of Appeals vacancies
Chart
The following chart tracks the number of vacancies on the United States Court of Appeals from the inauguration of President Joe Biden (D) to January 1, 2025.
Maps
The following maps show the number of vacancies on the United States Court of Appeals at the inauguration of President Joe Biden (D) and as of January 1, 2025.
U.S. District Court vacancies
The following map shows the number of vacancies in the United States District Courts as of January 1, 2025.
New nominations
President Joe Biden (D) announced no new nominations since the previous report.
Since taking office in January 2021, Biden has nominated 252 individuals to Article III positions.
New confirmations
There have been 14 new confirmations since the previous report:
- Anne Hwang, to the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California
- Brian Murphy, to the U.S. District Court for the District of Massachusetts
- Sparkle Sooknanan, to the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia
- Gail Weilheimer, to the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania
- Catherine Henry, to the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania
- Elizabeth Coombe, to the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of New York
- Anthony Brindisi, to the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of New York
- Sarah Davenport, to the U.S. District Court for the District of New Mexico
- Tiffany Johnson, to the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Georgia
- Keli Neary, to the U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania
- Cynthia Valenzuela, to the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California
- Noël Wise, to the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California
- Benjamin Cheeks, to the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of California
- Serena R. Murillo, to the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California
As of January 1, 2025, the Senate has confirmed 235 of President Biden's Article III judicial nominees—187 district court judges, 45 appeals court judges, two international trade judges, and one Supreme Court justice—since his inauguration on January 20, 2021. To review a complete list of Biden's confirmed nominees, click here.
Comparison of Article III judicial appointments over time by president
- Presidents have made an average of 201 judicial appointments through December 31 of their fourth year in office.
- President Joe Biden (D) made the most appointments through four years with 235. President Ronald Reagan (R) made the fewest through four years with 166.
- President Donald Trump (R) made the most appointments through three years with 187. President Ronald Reagan (R) made the fewest with 122.
- President Bill Clinton (D) made the most appointments through two years with 128. President Barack Obama (D) made the fewest with 62.
- President Ronald Reagan (R) made the most appointments through one year in office with 41. President Barack Obama (D) made the fewest with 13.
Comparison of Article III judicial appointments over time by president and court type
The table and chart below show the number of Article III judges confirmed by the U.S. Senate under each of the last seven presidents as of December 31 of their fourth year in office. The confirmations are broken up by court type.
- The median number of Supreme Court appointees is two. Two presidents (Reagan, and Biden) made one appointment. Three presidents (H.W. Bush, Bill Clinton, and Barack Obama) made two. One president (Donald Trump) made three. President George W. Bush did not appoint any SCOTUS justices by this point in his presidency.
- The median number of United States Court of Appeals appointees is 35. President Trump had the most appointees with 54. Presidents Clinton and Obama appointed the fewest with 30.
- The median number of United States District Court appointees is 168. President Biden had the most appointees with 187. President Reagan appointed the fewest with 129.
See also
- United States federal courts
- Current federal judicial vacancies
- Judicial vacancies during the Biden administration
- The Biden administration on federal courts
Footnotes
|