Become part of the movement for unbiased, accessible election information. Donate today.

The Trans-Pacific Partnership trade deal: Summary of the TPP

From Ballotpedia
Jump to: navigation, search

This page was last updated in 2017, when the United States ended Trans-Pacific Partnership trade deal negotiations. Please contact us us with any updates.


Foreign Policy Badge.png

The Trans-Pacific Partnership trade deal (TPP)

For more on the Trans-Pacific Partnership trade deal, view the following articles:
Overview
Summary
Public opinion
Legislation
Opposition
Human trafficking concerns
Understanding trade terminology
Federal policy on trade, 2017-2020
Trump administration officials on the Trans-Pacific Partnership trade deal, 2016-2018
115th Congress on trade
2016 presidential candidates on the Trans-Pacific Partnership trade deal
The Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership (TTIP)
Trump administration officials on the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA), 2016-2018

BP-Initials-UPDATED.png Ballotpedia's scope changes periodically, and this article type is no longer actively created or maintained. If you would like to help our coverage grow, consider donating to Ballotpedia.


On January 23, 2017, President Donald Trump (R) signed a memorandum that withdrew the United States from negotiations involving the Trans-Pacific Partnership trade deal (TPP). The action ended U.S. involvement in the multilateral trade deal, which had not been ratified by Congress.[1] The future of the TPP for the remaining nations was uncertain after the U.S. withdrew.

Background

After more than five years of negotiations, President Barack Obama's (D) U.S. Trade Representative Michael Froman announced that the United States and 11 other countries signed the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP) trade deal on February 4, 2016, calling it "an historic achievement for the Asia-Pacific region."[2] Froman and Obama argued that the TPP would create new jobs by opening up foreign markets for exporting goods and setting minimum standards for working conditions in the 11 other nations, leveling the playing field in the global market.

Shortly before the signing ceremony, Froman said that the deal would put America "squarely where it needs to be when it comes to both the global trading system and global leadership. It sends a signal that we’re prepared to lead a 21st century race to the top on trade and set new standards on everything from intellectual property rights, to a free and open internet, to labor and environment, to disciplines on state-owned enterprises."[3]

New Zealand's trade minister, Todd McClay, explained that signing the deal completed the negotiation process. Then, McClay added, "all 12 countries will be able to begin their respective domestic ratification processes and will have up to two years to complete that before the agreement enters into force."[4]

Although the short-term impact of the TPP was expected to be minimal, The Peterson Institute for International Economics estimated "that $77 billion per year would be added to US real incomes by 2025" and "around 650,000 more people, close to ½ percent of the labor force, can be expected to work in export-related jobs and correspondingly fewer in less productive import-competing jobs because of the TPP."[5]

A January 2016 study released by Tufts University predicted a more dismal outcome. The Tufts study found "that TPP would lead to losses in employment and increases in inequality. This is true particularly for the United States, where GDP is projected to fall slightly, employment would decline, and inequality is projected to increase as labor’s share of income falls." Tufts' researchers estimated that "GDP would be 0.54 percent lower than it would be without TPP, 10 years after the treaty enters into force," and 448,000 jobs would be lost in the United States.[6]

TPP summary

Below is a summary of the Trans-Pacific Partnership's 30 chapters, as outlined by the President Barack Obama's administration.[7]

See also

External links

Footnotes