Become part of the movement for unbiased, accessible election information. Donate today.

Theodore Wood

From Ballotpedia
Jump to: navigation, search
BP-Initials-UPDATED.png
This page was current at the end of the individual's last campaign covered by Ballotpedia. Please contact us with any updates.
Theodore Wood

Silhouette Placeholder Image.png


Elections and appointments
Last election

November 8, 2022

Education

Law

Baylor University School of Law, 1991

Personal
Birthplace
Ladysmith, Wis.
Profession
Attorney
Contact

Theodore Wood (independent) (also known as Ted) ran for election for the Chief Justice judge of the Texas First District Court of Appeals. He lost in the general election on November 8, 2022.

Wood completed Ballotpedia's Candidate Connection survey in 2022. Click here to read the survey answers.

Biography

Theodore Wood was born in Ladysmith, Wisconsin. He earned a J.D. from the Baylor University School of Law in 1991. Wood's career experience includes working as an attorney, as a judge in Randall County from 1995 to 2002, and with the Texas Office of Court Administration. He has been affiliated with the Texas Criminal Defense Lawyers Association and with the Harris County Criminal Lawyers Association.[1]

Elections

2022

See also: Texas intermediate appellate court elections, 2022

General election

General election for Texas First District Court of Appeals Chief Justice

Terry Adams defeated incumbent Julie Countiss and Theodore Wood in the general election for Texas First District Court of Appeals Chief Justice on November 8, 2022.

Candidate
%
Votes
Terry Adams (R)
 
50.8
 
820,060
Image of Julie Countiss
Julie Countiss (D)
 
46.8
 
756,501
Theodore Wood (Independent) Candidate Connection
 
2.4
 
38,560

Total votes: 1,615,121
Candidate Connection = candidate completed the Ballotpedia Candidate Connection survey.
If you are a candidate and would like to tell readers and voters more about why they should vote for you, complete the Ballotpedia Candidate Connection Survey.

Do you want a spreadsheet of this type of data? Contact our sales team.

Democratic primary election

Democratic primary for Texas First District Court of Appeals Chief Justice

Incumbent Julie Countiss advanced from the Democratic primary for Texas First District Court of Appeals Chief Justice on March 1, 2022.

Candidate
%
Votes
Image of Julie Countiss
Julie Countiss
 
100.0
 
199,571

Total votes: 199,571
Candidate Connection = candidate completed the Ballotpedia Candidate Connection survey.
If you are a candidate and would like to tell readers and voters more about why they should vote for you, complete the Ballotpedia Candidate Connection Survey.

Do you want a spreadsheet of this type of data? Contact our sales team.

Republican primary election

Republican primary for Texas First District Court of Appeals Chief Justice

Terry Adams advanced from the Republican primary for Texas First District Court of Appeals Chief Justice on March 1, 2022.

Candidate
%
Votes
Terry Adams
 
100.0
 
254,690

Total votes: 254,690
Candidate Connection = candidate completed the Ballotpedia Candidate Connection survey.
If you are a candidate and would like to tell readers and voters more about why they should vote for you, complete the Ballotpedia Candidate Connection Survey.

Do you want a spreadsheet of this type of data? Contact our sales team.

Campaign themes

2022

Ballotpedia survey responses

See also: Ballotpedia's Candidate Connection

Candidate Connection

Theodore Wood completed Ballotpedia's Candidate Connection survey in 2022. The survey questions appear in bold and are followed by Wood's responses. Candidates are asked three required questions for this survey, but they may answer additional optional questions as well.

Expand all | Collapse all

I am 62 years old. I have been a licensed attorney in Texas for 31 years. For nearly eight years, I was the Randall County Judge. I have also worked for the Texas Office of Court Administration. And I worked as a briefing attorney for the Seventh Court of Appeals in Amarillo.

I am currently an assistant public defender for Harris County, Texas. I have handled about 50 appeals in the Texas appellate courts. I also handle legislative issues for the Public Defender's Office.

I am running as an Independent candidate for the First Court of Appeals. I am the first Independent candidate for a court of appeals in Texas in over 25 years. I am running to give voters a non-partisan choice for Chief Justice of the First Court of Appeals.
  • Judges should not be Republicans or Democrats. It is not the role of a judge to promote a political agenda. When judges run as Democrats or Republicans, people believe the results of court cases are based on politics. This is bad. This is why am running as an Independent. partisan political agenda.
  • Judges should not accept campaign contributions. Taking campaign contributions undermines confidence in the courts. This is why I am accepting no money in this campaign.
  • Many people think judges and judicial candidates must run as members of a political party. This is untrue. There has always been a way to run as an Independent candidate. I am proof of that.
I intensely dislike our current Texas system of partisan judicial elections. Unfortunately, the Texas Legislature is decidedly uninterested in doing away with partisan judicial elections.

Most Texans believe that the only way to run for judge is as a member of a political party. This is such an ingrained belief that voters don't understand that it's actually possible to elect judges who choose to run as Independents.

Because it is possible to run for judge as an Independent, it is possible to elect non-partisan judges. This would be a way to change the system from within. If we wait for the Legislature to do away with partisan judicial elections, we will be waiting for decades.

My candidacy is an attempt to show the citizens of Texas that we already have the power to elect judges who are not tainted by an association with a political party.

I am the first Independent candidate for a court of appeals in Texas since 1996. This is candidacy that truly involves some thinking outside of the box. Win or lose, I hope my Independent candidacy will foster an understanding among the general population that judges are not forced to run as Democrats or Republicans. That is a choice that judicial candidates make. I would like to see more Independent judicial candidates in future years. Independent judges would serve to increase confidence in our courts.

I look up to Wallace Jefferson, a former Chief Justice of the Texas Supreme Court. He has been a leader in trying to change our system of partisan judicial elections in Texas. He has also been a leader in advocating for an end to the practice of accepting campaign contributions is judicial races.

I would encourage people to read the State-of-the-Judiciary addresses by former Texas Supreme Court Chief Justice Wallace Jefferson. In those addresses to the Texas Legislature at the beginning of every legislative session, he explains that the biggest problem in the Texas court system is the public's lack of confidence in the courts. Jefferson explains that the lack of confidence means the Texas judicial system is broken. The system can only be repaired if we do away with the partisan election of judges and with contributions to judicial candidates.
For judges, the most important characteristic is independence. Running as a partisan is inimical to this very idea.
Judges undermine their legitimacy by running as Republicans or Democrats.
I am very good at evaluating legal arguments. I am also good at legal writing and research. I would be able to step into the responsibility of writing legal opinions with little difficulty. There would not be much of a learning curve for me.

As a former county judge (kind of like a county mayor), I have the administrative skills necessary to serve as chief justice of a court of appeals.
An appellate judge must be good at evaluating competing legal arguments. Appellate judges must also be very skilled writers so they can explain their rulings clearly and directly. The opinions that are produced by appellate judges become the law that lawyers and other judges must follow. This is why the opinions produced by appellate judges must be clear, direct, and not result-oriented.
I would like to be remembered as the first Independent judge to ever serve on a court of appeals in Texas.
"We Can't Make it Here Anymore" by James McMurtry.
I lost an adult son to suicide three years ago.
There are three levels of courts in the Texas court system that form a pyramid.

The first level of courts are the trial courts such as district courts and county-level courts. These courts form the base of the pyramid.

The second level of courts are the intermediate courts of appeals. These courts are required to hear almost all appeals from the trial courts. There are 14 of these courts and they form the middle level of the pyramid. The First Court of Appeals (the court i am running for) is one of these 14 courts.

The third level of courts are the two courts at the top of the pyramid. In civil matters, the top court is the Texas Supreme Court. In criminal matters, the top court is the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals. These courts hear appeals from the intermediate courts of appeals. But these top courts only hear appeals that they choose to hear. And they do not choose to hear very many such appeals. What this means is that, for all practical purposes, an intermediate court of appeals will have the last word in a particular case.

And whatever decisions these intermediate courts of appeals make will become precedent in future cases. So the decisions of the courts of appeals are very important in establishing the law that is to be followed in the State of Texas.
Follow the law and let the chips fall where they may.

The role of a judge is not to promote a particular political agenda. The only role of a judge is to follow the law -- even if that means reaching a decision that is not in line with the judge's own personal, political beliefs.
Wallace Jefferson, former Chief Justice of the Texas Supreme Court.

The current chief justice is retiring. So I am running for an open seat. As the lead member of the First Court of Appeals, the chief justice can set a tone for the Court. And as an Independent Chief Justice, I can increase confidence among the general public that the decisions of the court are based on the law -- not on politics or contributions.

While the Democratic candidate in this race, Julie Countiss, is currently a member of the Court, she is not the incumbent. There is no incumbent. So a vote for me is not a vote against Julie Countiss. She will remain on the Court even if she loses. So I encourage people to vote for me even if they think Julie Countiss has done a fine job. This is a rare opportunity to move the Court in the direction that will increase public confidence in the First Court of Appeals and in the courts of Texas as a whole.
The general public does not have confidence in the decisions of the Texas courts. This is especially the case when it comes to the decisions of the Texas Supreme Court, the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals, and the 14 Texas intermediate courts of appeals.

The reason there is very little confidence in the decisions of these courts is two-fold.

First, people believe the decisions of the courts are based on politics -- not in the law. This is understandable because judges typically run as Republicans or Democrats.

Second, judges accept campaign contributions to fund their campaigns. People believe that these contributions affect judicial decisions.

The lack of confidence in our court system is alarming. I am trying to do something about it.

First, I am running as an Independent -- not as a Republican, Democrat, Libertarian. etc. I want people to have full confidence that whatever decision I reach is based on the law and not on politics.

Second, I am not accepting any campaign contributions. I do not want people to think that my rulings have anything whatsoever to do with contributions.
The current law in Texas allows judges to run as Independents. It's actually somewhat amazing that I am the first Independent candidate for a court of appeals in Texas in more than 25 years. Anyone can run as an Independent if he or she chooses to do so. Why do candidates choose to undermine their legitimacy as fair and unbiased jurists by identifying as Republicans or Democrats? It's actually a case of a lack of vision that things can be different. And we need not wait for the Legislature to make things different. We can change the system from within under the laws we currently have.

My campaign is a campaign of vision, Please join me!
I am 62 years old. This is the only court that I plan to ever run for.

Note: Ballotpedia reserves the right to edit Candidate Connection survey responses. Any edits made by Ballotpedia will be clearly marked with [brackets] for the public. If the candidate disagrees with an edit, he or she may request the full removal of the survey response from Ballotpedia.org. Ballotpedia does not edit or correct typographical errors unless the candidate's campaign requests it.

See also


External links

Footnotes

  1. Information submitted to Ballotpedia through the Candidate Connection survey on October 21, 2022