Become part of the movement for unbiased, accessible election information. Donate today.

Thomas E. Kuhnle

From Ballotpedia
Jump to: navigation, search
BP-Initials-UPDATED.png
This page was last updated during the official's most recent election or appointment. Please contact us with any updates.
Thomas E. Kuhnle
Image of Thomas E. Kuhnle
Superior Court of Santa Clara County
Tenure

2010 - Present

Term ends

2031

Years in position

15

Elections and appointments
Last elected

March 5, 2024

Appointed

2010

Thomas E. Kuhnle is a judge of the Superior Court of Santa Clara County in California. He assumed office in 2010. His current term ends on January 6, 2031.

Kuhnle won re-election for judge of the Superior Court of Santa Clara County in California outright in the primary on March 5, 2024, after the primary and general election were canceled.

Kuhnle was appointed to the superior court by Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger to succeed Jamie A. Jacobs-May.[1]

Biography

Kuhnle received his undergraduate degree from Stanford University and his J.D. from Stanford Law School. Before his appointment, Kuhnle was an attorney in private practice.[1]

Elections

2024

See also: Municipal elections in Santa Clara County, California (2024)

Nonpartisan primary election

The primary election was canceled. Thomas E. Kuhnle (Nonpartisan) won the election without appearing on the ballot.

Endorsements

Ballotpedia did not identify endorsements for Kuhnle in this election.

2018

See also: Municipal elections in Santa Clara County, California (2018)

Nonpartisan primary election

The primary election was canceled. Thomas E. Kuhnle (Nonpartisan) won the election without appearing on the ballot.

Selection method

See also: Nonpartisan election

The 1,535 judges of the California Superior Courts compete in nonpartisan races in even-numbered years. If a candidate receives more than 50 percent of the vote in the June primary election, he or she is declared the winner; if no candidate receives more than 50 percent of the vote, a runoff between the top two candidates is held during the November general election.[2][3][4][5]

If an incumbent judge is running unopposed in an election, his or her name does not appear on the ballot. The judge is automatically re-elected following the general election.[2]

The chief judge of any given superior court is selected by peer vote of the court's members. He or she serves in that capacity for one or two years, depending on the county.[2]

Qualifications
Candidates are required to have 10 years of experience as a law practitioner or as a judge of a court of record.[2]

2012

Kuhnle ran for re-election to the superior court in 2012. As an unopposed incumbent, his name did not appear on the ballot. After the primary election, Kuhnle was automatically re-elected.[6]

See also: California judicial elections, 2012

Campaign themes

2024

Ballotpedia survey responses

See also: Ballotpedia's Candidate Connection

Thomas E. Kuhnle did not complete Ballotpedia's 2024 Candidate Connection survey.

Noteworthy cases

Santa Clara's at-large city council electoral system violates California Voting Rights Act (2018)

See also: Superior Court of Santa Clara County, California (Kaku v. City of Santa Clara)

On May 15, 2018, Judge Thomas E. Kuhnle, of the Santa Clara County Superior Court, issued his proposed statement of decision in Kaku v. City of Santa Clara, finding that the city's at-large electoral system for city council seats violates the California Voting Rights Act (CVRA). The CVRA provides that an at-large electoral system "may not be imposed or applied in a manner that impairs the ability of a protected class to elect candidates." The plaintiffs in the suit, a group of Asian American voters (a protected class under the CVRA), allege that Santa Clara's at-large electoral system for city council seats prevents them from electing candidates of their choosing. Kuhnle agreed, writing the following in his ruling: "Based on the evidence presented at trial, the Court finds that Plaintiffs have proven by a preponderance of the evidence that the at-large method used by the City impairs the ability of Asians to elect candidates as a result of the dilution and abridgment of their rights as voters." The parties to the suit have 15 days to file objections to Kuhnle's proposed statement of decision before it is finalized.[7][8]

On June 5, 2018, Santa Clara citizens voted on a city charter amendment providing for the implementation of a two-district, ranked-choice voting electoral system for council seats. It was unclear how Kuhnle's final ruling might impact or involve the amendment vote.

See also


External links

Footnotes