Help us improve in just 2 minutes—share your thoughts in our reader survey.

Tom Price (Texas)

From Ballotpedia
Jump to: navigation, search
Tom Price

Silhouette Placeholder Image.png


Prior offices
Texas Court of Criminal Appeals Place 3

Education

Bachelor's

East Texas State University

Law

Baylor University School of Law, 1970


Tom Price was a judge for the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals. He was elected to the court on November 5, 1996, and retired at the end of his last term in December 2014.[1][2]

Education

Price received his undergraduate degree from East Texas State University. In 1970, he earned his J.D. degree from the Baylor University School of Law.[3][4]

Career

Price began his career in private practice. In 1974, he was elected to the Dallas County Criminal Court, where he remained until his election to the 282nd Criminal District Court in 1986. He was elected to the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals in 1996.[3]

Awards and associations

  • 1991-1996: Chairman, Community Justice Council Committee [3]

Elections

2008

Price was re-elected to the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals in 2008.[5]

Candidate IncumbentSeatPartyElection %
Supreme-Court-Elections-badge.png
Tom Price ApprovedA YesPlace 3Republican51.6%
Susan Strawn NoPlace 3Democratic45.5%
Matthew Eilers NoPlace 3Libertarian2.8%


Political ideology

See also: Political ideology of State Supreme Court Justices

In October 2012, political science professors Adam Bonica and Michael Woodruff of Stanford University attempted to determine the partisan ideology of state supreme court justices. They created a scoring system in which a score above 0 indicated a more conservative-leaning ideology, while scores below 0 were more liberal.

Price received a campaign finance score of 1.46, indicating a conservative ideological leaning. This was more conservative than the average score of 0.91 that justices received in Texas.

The study was based on data from campaign contributions by the judges themselves, the partisan leaning of those who contributed to the judges' campaigns, or, in the absence of elections, the ideology of the appointing body (governor or legislature). This study was not a definitive label of a justice, but an academic summary of various relevant factors.[6]

See also

External links

Footnotes