Your monthly support provides voters the knowledge they need to make confident decisions at the polls. Donate today.

Tom Yates

From Ballotpedia
Jump to: navigation, search

Local Politics Image.jpg

Ballotpedia provides comprehensive election coverage of the 100 largest cities in America by population as well as mayoral, city council, and district attorney election coverage in state capitals outside of the 100 largest cities. This board member is outside of that coverage scope and does not receive scheduled updates.


BP-Initials-UPDATED.png
Ballotpedia does not currently cover this office or maintain this page. Please contact us with any updates.
Tom Yates
Image of Tom Yates
Prior offices
Iowa City Community School District school board At-large

Education

Bachelor's

University of Iowa

Graduate

University of Iowa

Personal
Profession
Educator

Tom Yates is an at-large member of the Iowa City Community School District Board of Education in Iowa. The seat was up for general election on September 8, 2015. He defeated candidates Shawn Eyestone, Todd Fanning, Jason Lewis, Brian Richman, Lucas Van Orden and Brianna Wills for the seat with a four-year term.[1][2]

The controversial closing of an elementary school caused district residents to question the board's 10-year facilities master plan.[3] Yates explained why he supports amending the plan to keep the elementary school in question open.[4]

Biography

Email editor@ballotpedia.org to notify us of updates to this biography.

Yates is a retired teacher. He taught language arts for 31 years at City High School in the Iowa City school district. Yates obtained his bachelor's and master's degree from the University of Iowa.[5]

Elections

2015

See also: Iowa City Community School District elections (2015)

Five of the seven seats on the Iowa City Community School District Board of Education were up for election on September 8, 2015. Four seats have a four-year term, and one seat has a two-year term. All seats on the board of education represent the district at-large.

The candidates for the four-year term seats were LaTasha DeLoach, Shawn Eyestone, Todd Fanning, Phil Hemingway, Jason Lewis, Brian Richman, Lori Roetlin, Lucas Van Orden, Brianna Wills and Tom Yates. Incumbents Patti Fields, Jeff McGinness, Marla Swesey and Orville Townsend did not run for re-election. DeLoach, Hemingway, Roetlin and Yates defeated Eyestone, Fanning, Lewis, Richman Van Orden and Wills for the four seats.[1]

Board member Tuyet Baruah resigned from the board leaving an open seat with a two-year term. The candidates for the vacant seat were Christopher Liebig, Paul Roesler and Megan Schwalm. Liebig defeated Roesler and Schwalm for the seat.[1][6][7]

Results

This election was held September 8, 2015.

Iowa City Community School District, At-Large, 4-Year Term, General Election, 2015
Candidate Vote % Votes
Green check mark transparent.png LaTasha DeLoach 17.5% 4,316
Green check mark transparent.png Phil Hemingway 14.1% 3,469
Green check mark transparent.png Tom Yates 13.8% 3,403
Green check mark transparent.png Lori Roetlin 12.5% 3,065
Brian Richman 10.6% 2,598
Jason Lewis 10.3% 2,538
Todd Fanning 7.5% 1,833
Brianna Wills 6.4% 1,574
Shawn Eyestone 5.4% 1,337
Lucas Van Orden 1.9% 469
Total Votes 24,602
Source: Johnson County Auditor's Office, "School Election Results," accessed November 12, 2015

Funding

Yates reported $2,688.65 in contributions and $1,995.88 in expenditures to the Iowa Ethics and Campaign Disclosure Board, which left his campaign with $692.77 on hand in the election.[8]

Endorsements

Yates received official endorsements from the Iowa City Federation of Labor,[9] Save Hoover Committee[10], the Iowa City Education Association[11] and North Corridor Parents.[12]

Campaign themes

2015

Position on school closing

See also: Controversial closing of elementary school included in facilities master plan

The advocacy group Save Hoover asked each candidate, "If you are elected, will you support amending the long-term facilities plan to keep Hoover Elementary School open?" Yates gave the following response:

I am leaning toward keeping Hoover open. Here are my reasons:

--Informally, my own poll of this question to anyone I talk to (and I always ask) is about 3-1 in favor of keeping it open. I am in favor of keeping neighborhood schools open, in general.

--I am not convinced that the future of a chunk of the Facilities Master Plan is contingent on Hoover's closing. I see what the intended links are for the expansion of current schools to take care of Hoover's student population, but I do not think they all add up.

--The lack of a plan for the site, demolished or not, is a bad sign. Portions of the last two board meetings have led to no clear purpose/plan. Discussion of City High needs, and the list presented at the last meeting, do not indicate a need for more acreage. I taught in that building for 31 years, and can think of several ways to get better use of its space, or added space, than the last two expansion projects. The lack of imagination concerning City baffles me. [13]

—Tom Yates, [14]

What was at stake?

2015

Five seats were up for election in 2015. Four of the seats came with a four-year term, while one seat had a two-year term. Thirteen candidates ran for the five seats, and no incumbents ran for re-election. Five new members joined the seven-member board.

The 10-year facilities master plan was an ongoing topic for candidates. The closing of a local elementary school was the most controversial aspect of the master plan, and many citizens are calling for alterations to the plan to keep the school open.[3]

Issues in the district

Position on amending facilities plan
to keep Hoover Elementary open[4]
Click on the candidates' answer to see their full statement regarding the issue.
Candidate Position
Four-year term candidates
LaTasha DeLoach Oppose
Shawn Eyestone Oppose
Todd Fanning Oppose
Phil Hemingway Support
Brian Richman Support
Lori Roetlin Oppose
Lucas Van Orden Oppose
Brianna Wills Oppose
Tom Yates Support
Two-year term candidates
Christopher Liebig Support
Paul Roesler Oppose
Megan Schwalm Oppose
Controversial closing of elementary school

In 2013, the Iowa City Board of Education decided on a 10-year facilities master plan that included the closing of Hoover Elementary School. The school was located in the middle of a mixed-income, residential area. Hoover is set to close after the 2018-2019 school year.

The 2013 facilities master plan called for a new Hoover Elementary School to be finished in 2017. At that time, the new school building will be used as a transition school and house students from other areas while other new elementary schools are being built. In 2019, it would open as a traditional school for the students that previously occupied Hoover Elementary. The plan called for the building to be located further away from the current location at the center of the community.

The advocacy group Save Hoover, spearheaded by candidate Christopher Liebig, raised over $4,000 and collected 800 names on a petition opposing the school closing as of July 2015. Opponents of the school closing felt that the school is essential to the community, and the district did not fully explained the reason for closing it. Residents became more aware of the issue as the closing date of the school drew nearer.[15]

I think the top concern is retaining the current quality of the Hoover teachers. Giving teachers the incentive to stay, as long as Hoover is open.[13]
—Melanie Sigafoose, past president, Hoover PTA, [3]
School board president, Chris Lynch

School board president Chris Lynch responded to concerns that moving schools like Hoover Elementary away from the center of Iowa City would discourage growth in the inner city. He stated that the idea of schools encouraging sprawl on the outskirts of the city is not necessarily true. He reiterated the district's commitment to the core of Iowa City.[3]

You’ve never seen an investment like right now. You’ve never seen a school board commit to more investment in inner Iowa City than this school board right now. There’s no reason that the schools on the outside of town need to take away from the schools on the inside of town, if we can drive growth across the district.[13]
—Chris Lynch, school board president (2015), [3]

Yates, Hemingway, Richman and Liebig are in favor of altering the current facilities plan to keep Hoover Elementary open. DeLoach, Fanning, Lewis, Roetlin, Van Orden, Wills, Roesler and Schwalm support the facilities master plan as it is.[4]

The new school construction, as well as other renovations in the facilities master plan, could be part of a possible bond package that is expected to be presented in 2017.[3][16]

Recent news

The link below is to the most recent stories in a Google news search for the terms 'Tom Yates' 'Iowa City Community School District'. These results are automatically generated from Google. Ballotpedia does not curate or endorse these articles.

See also

External links

Footnotes

  1. 1.0 1.1 1.2 Johnson County Auditor's Office, "School Election Results," accessed September 8, 2015
  2. Johnson County, Iowa, "September 8, 2015 School Election," accessed August 3, 2015
  3. 3.0 3.1 3.2 3.3 3.4 3.5 KCRG, "Hoover Elementary parents seek more information on reasons for closing school," June 17, 2015
  4. 4.0 4.1 4.2 Save Hoover, "Compilation: The School Board Candidates Respond to the Hoover Question," August 16, 2015
  5. Iowa City Press Citizen, "Tom Yates to run for Iowa City School Board seat," May 11, 2015
  6. Johnson County, Iowa, "September 8, 2015 School Election," accessed August 3, 2015
  7. Iowa City Community School District, "School Board Members," accessed June 23, 2015
  8. Iowa Ethics and Campaign Disclosure Board, "IECDB State/Local Campaign Disclosure Reports," accessed February 2, 2016
  9. Iowa City Federation of Labor, "2015 Elections," accessed September 6, 2015
  10. Save Hoover, "Hemingway, Richman, Yates and Liebig for School Board," August 28, 2015
  11. Iowa City Education Association, "2015 Press Release," accessed September 6, 2015
  12. North Corridor Parents, "Candidate Recommendations," accessed September 6, 2015
  13. 13.0 13.1 13.2 Note: This text is quoted verbatim from the original source. Any inconsistencies are attributable to the original source.
  14. Save Hoover, "Compilation: The School Board Candidates Respond to the Hoover Question," August 16, 2015
  15. Save Hoover, "Mid-summer campaign update," July 13, 2015
  16. The Gazette, "Iowa City school district changes Hoover plan, updates facilities timeline," March 28 ,2015