Become part of the movement for unbiased, accessible election information. Donate today.

Tulsa Public Schools, Oklahoma

From Ballotpedia
Jump to: navigation, search
Tulsa Public Schools
School Board badge.png
Tulsa, Oklahoma
District details
Superintendent: Ebony Johnson
# of school board members: 7
Website: Link

Tulsa Public Schools is a school district in Tulsa, Oklahoma.

Click on the links below to learn more about the school district's...

Superintendent

BP-Initials-UPDATED.png
This information is updated as we become aware of changes. Please contact us with any updates.

Ebony Johnson is the superintendent of Tulsa Public Schools. Johnson was appointed interim superintendent in September 2023, and full superintendent in December 2023. Johnson's previous career experience includes working as the district's Chief Learning Officer and as an adjunct professor at the University of Oklahoma.[1][2][3]

Past superintendents

School board

The Tulsa Public School school board consists of seven members elected by district to four-year terms.[6]

Elections

See also: Tulsa Public Schools, Oklahoma, elections

Members of the Tulsa Public Schools school board are elected to four-year terms. Either one seat or two seats are up for election each year.

Two seats on the school board were up for general election on April 1, 2025. A primary was scheduled for February 11, 2025.

Ballotpedia covered school board elections in 367 school districts in 29 states in 2024. Those school districts had a total student enrollment of 12,203,404 students. Click here to read an analysis of those elections.


Join the conversation about school board politics

Hall Pass

Stay up to date on school board politics!

Subscribe for a weekly roundup of the sharpest commentary and research from across the political spectrum with Ballotpedia's Hall Pass newsletter.


Public participation in board meetings

The Tulsa Public Schools school board maintains the following policy on public testimony during board meetings:[7]

Public Comments at School Board Meetings

Citizens are encouraged to attend meetings of the Board of Education and are allowed to address the Board and to comment as allowed under this policy.

Public comment is allowed only at a regular meeting or at a special meeting declared to be a public hearing for that purpose. Public comment at regular meetings is allowed for two purposes—to respond to an item on the action agenda or to provide comments regarding topics not on the current agenda (“Citizen Comment”). Speakers’ comments should be shorter than three minutes, but in no event shall a speaker have more than five minutes when providing comment. If an individual is providing comment on an action item and as a Citizen Comment, the time will be counted separately.

The board welcomes input from all members of the community and will have translation services available at the board meeting for the purpose of receiving public comment, as needed. If the person providing public comment uses translation services to communicate with the board, up to five additional minutes will be provided to the speaker to ensure the use of translation services does not impair the speaker’s ability to provide their comments. Time will be counted separately if the person is providing both agenda-related comments and Citizen’s Comments.

The Board President may interrupt and terminate any presentation not deemed to be in accordance with the guidelines set out by this policy, for example if the person providing comments uses profanity or other abusive language against board members, or if the speaker attempts to present comments regarding an issue in a pending lawsuit. The relevant guidelines are described below and outlined on the paper and electronic forms the public completes when signing up to speak. The Board President may also, after a warning, preclude an individual speaker from addressing the Board at that meeting and/or at the next regular meeting of the Board of Education for violation of the guidelines set out by this policy.

Public Comment Guidelines

School board policies, state law, and federal law establish separate and distinct procedures and forums for the resolution of employee grievances, employee complaints, employee suspensions and terminations, complaints against individual employees, pupil suspensions and appeals, political campaigns, and litigation.

To avoid circumvention of these separate proceedings and to assure fairness to all parties concerned, no person will be allowed to speak regarding the following:

  • An issue in a pending lawsuit, complaint, or investigation filed with an outside

agency, wherein the District, employee(s) or the Board is a party;

  • A pending grievance;
  • A pending employee complaint filed with the District or an outside agency;
  • A complaint against individual employee(s);
  • An employee disciplinary action including suspension or termination;
  • A pending pupil disciplinary action including suspension or appeal that may

reach the Board. The individual dignity of Board members, District employees, students, and membersof the public must be respected by all speakers. Board members, employees, students, or members of the public will not be subjected to verbal abuse.

Comments Concerning Items on the Action Agenda

All public comment regarding matters on the action agenda shall be received together as a separate item on the agenda prior to the consideration of the action agenda. Requests to comment must be made by submitting a completed form for that purpose. Paper forms are available from the Board Clerk before the beginning of each meeting and will be accepted up to 6:25 pm on the day of the meeting. Electronic forms will be available online and shall be submitted after the relevant agenda has posted and no later than noon on the day of the meeting. Each individual requesting to speak must personally complete the form listing their name and contact information and verify they have read the instructions regarding comments. The individual will also indicate on the form if they are speaking on their own behalf or on behalf of a group and whether or not they support or oppose the item (as applicable). Speakers are encouraged to provide the Board with a written outline of their comments to be made available to them before or at the meeting.

The total time limit will apply to each speaker regardless of the number of agenda items to which they wish to speak

The Board and staff will not dialogue with speakers. When determined to be appropriate by the Superintendent, staff will strive to provide answers or resolve any issues/concerns in a timely manner.

“Citizen’s Comments”—Comments Concerning Items Not on an Agenda

The agenda for the regularly scheduled meetings of the Board will include an item designated “Citizens’ Comments.” This portion of the agenda will be reserved for comments concerning issues not otherwise appearing on an agenda to provide citizens an opportunity to address the Board of Education, and it is not intended to provide a forum for commercial, political, personal or similar topics.

An individual wishing to comment during this portion of a meeting must personally sign and submit a completed request form with all supporting documents to the Clerk of the Board seven calendar days before the meeting at which the individual wishes to speak. The forms are available online or from the Clerk of the Board of Education. Each individual requesting to speak must complete the form and verify they have read instructions.

Generic topics will not be accepted. The topic listed on the request form must be brief but specific enough to satisfy posting requirements under state law. The topic should be worded so an ordinary individual would understand what the topic is about. The topic language submitted by the citizen will be reviewed and approved or disapproved by the attorney for the School District. Individuals will also indicate on the form if they are speaking on their own behalf or on behalf of a group. Speakers will be notified regarding approval or disapproval of their request. The Superintendent or designee will address speakers' specific issues or concerns within 60 days.

The total time limit of Citizens’ Comments will apply to each speaker during a meeting regardless of the number of topics on which the individual requests to speak. Speakers are welcomed and encouraged to provide the Board with a written outline of their comments to be made available to them before or at the meeting.[8]

District map

Budget

The following statistics were published by the National Center for Education Statistics, which is a part of the U.S. Department of Education.[9]

Revenue, 2020-2021
SOURCE AMOUNT AMOUNT PER STUDENT PERCENT
Federal: $66,965,000 $2,056 15%
Local: $221,606,000 $6,804 51%
State: $147,044,000 $4,515 34%
Total: $435,615,000 $13,375
Expenditures, 2020-2021
TYPE AMOUNT AMOUNT PER STUDENT PERCENT
Total Expenditures: $453,002,000 $13,908
Total Current Expenditures: $383,153,000 $11,764
Instructional Expenditures: $192,286,000 $5,903 42%
Student and Staff Support: $62,326,000 $1,913 14%
Administration: $59,262,000 $1,819 13%
Operations, Food Service, Other: $69,279,000 $2,127 15%
Total Capital Outlay: $62,383,000 $1,915
Construction: $59,150,000 $1,816
Total Non El-Sec Education & Other: $2,067,000 $63
Interest on Debt: $5,399,000 $165


Teacher salaries

The following salary information was pulled from the district's teacher salary schedule. A salary schedule is a list of expected compensations based on variables such as position, years employed, and education level. It may not reflect actual teacher salaries in the district.

Year Minimum Maximum
2024-2025[10] $43,500 $82,548
2022-2023[11] $40,000 $68,886
2020[12] $40,000 $68,886
2019 $40,000 $68,886

Academic performance

Each year, state and local education agencies use tests and other standards to assess student proficiency. Although the data below was published by the U.S. Department of Education, proficiency measurements are established by the states. As a result, proficiency levels are not comparable between different states and year-over-year proficiency levels within a district may not be comparable because states may change their proficiency measurements.[13]

The following table shows the percentage of district students who scored at or above the proficiency level each school year:

School year All (%) Asian/Pacific Islander (%) Black (%) Hispanic (%) Native American (%) Two or More Races (%) White (%)
2020-2021 7 14 2 4 9 10 17
2018-2019 16 23 7 11 17 18 30
2017-2018 16 30 7 11 16 19 30
2016-2017 19 35 9 14 19 22 33
2015-2016 45 61 30 42 45 49 61
2014-2015 43 57 30 39 46 46 59
2013-2014 42 60-64 31 38 43 45 57
2012-2013 52 70-74 41 48 53 55 68
2011-2012 52 75 39 46 53 55 68
2010-2011 55 70 43 52 54 67

The following table shows the percentage of district students who scored at or above the proficiency level each school year:

School year All (%) Asian/Pacific Islander (%) Black (%) Hispanic (%) Native American (%) Two or More Races (%) White (%)
2020-2021 12 16 6 6 12 16 25
2018-2019 19 23 10 12 22 24 36
2017-2018 21 29 11 14 20 25 38
2016-2017 23 31 12 15 25 27 41
2015-2016 53 60 39 47 57 60 69
2014-2015 52 62 41 44 56 57 69
2013-2014 51 60-64 38 42 55 57 68
2012-2013 54 65-69 43 46 57 56 71
2011-2012 53 65 42 42 57 57 70
2010-2011 55 61 45 47 59 70

The following table shows the graduation rate of district students each school year:

School year All (%) Asian/Pacific Islander (%) Black (%) Hispanic (%) Native American (%) Two or More Races (%) White (%)
2019-2020 71 70-79 72 74 55-59 65-69 70
2018-2019 78 >=90 77 78 70-74 75-79 82
2017-2018 75 80-89 75 75 65-69 70-74 77
2016-2017 77 >=90 79 75 70-74 75-79 79
2015-2016 73 80-89 76 70 60-64 70-74 72
2014-2015 68 80-89 67 65 60-64 60-64 72
2013-2014 63 80-89 61 62 55-59 55-59 66
2012-2013 65 80-89 62 60 60-64 55-59 71


Students

Year Enrollment Year-to-year change (%)
2022-2023 33,871 1.9
2021-2022 33,211 1.9
2020-2021 32,569 -9.5
2019-2020 35,675 -2.3
2018-2019 36,512 -2.5
2017-2018 37,433 -3.2
2016-2017 38,625 -2.1
2015-2016 39,455 -1.4
2014-2015 39,999 -0.4
2013-2014 40,152 -2.3
2012-2013 41,076 -0.3
2011-2012 41,199 -0.7
2010-2011 41,501 0.0
2009-2010 41,493 0.7
2008-2009 41,195 -0.2
2007-2008 41,271 -0.4
2006-2007 41,438 -0.3
2005-2006 41,568 -0.1
2004-2005 41,629 -1.6
2003-2004 42,280 -1.8
2002-2003 43,029 1.7
2001-2002 42,302 -1.2
2000-2001 42,812 0.0
1999-2000 42,793 0.0
Racial Demographics, 2022-2023
RACE Tulsa Public Schools (%) Oklahoma K-12 STUDENTS (%)
American Indian/Alaska Native 4.6 11.2
Asian or Asian/Pacific Islander 2.0 2.3
Black 22.6 7.9
Hispanic 37.1 19.8
Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islander 1.3 0.4
Two or More Races 10.7 12.9
White 21.7 45.5

Note: Percentages for race and ethnicity may add up to more than 100 percent because respondents may report more than one race and the Hispanic/Latino ethnicity may be selected in conjunction with any race. Read more about race and ethnicity in the census here.


Staff

As of the 2022-2023 school year, Tulsa Public Schools had 1,715.95 full-time classroom teachers. The student-teacher ratio was 19.74.

Teachers, 2022-2023 school year
TYPE NUMBER OF TEACHERS
Prekindergarten: 92.96
Kindergarten: 96.89
Elementary: 810.60
Secondary: 715.50
Total: 1,715.95

Tulsa Public Schools employed 47.75 district administrators and 130.58 school administrators as of the 2022-2023 school year.

Administrators, 2022-2023 school year
TYPE NUMBER OF ADMINISTRATORS
District Administrators: 47.75
District Administrative Support: 179.10
School Administrators: 130.58
School Administrative Support: 223.76
Other staff, 2022-2023 school year
TYPE NUMBER OF OTHER STAFF
Instructional Aides: 531.67
Instruc. Coordinators & Supervisors: 40.00
Total Guidance Counselors: 107.78
Elementary Guidance Counselors: 42.30
Secondary Guidance Counselors: 65.48
Librarians/Media Specialists: 58.00
Library/Media Support: 2.92
Student Support Services: 391.80
Other Support Services: 972.38


Schools

Tulsa Public Schools operates 69 schools. They are listed below in alphabetical order.
List of schools
SCHOOL NAMENUMBER OF STUDENTSGRADES
Anderson Es347PK-5
Bell Es354PK-5
Booker T. Washington Hs1,2809-12
Burroughs Es305PK-5
Carnegie Es433PK-5
Carver Ms6566-8
Celia Clinton Es535PK-5
Central Hs4149-12
Central Ms2936-8
Clinton West Es341PK-5
Cooper Es557PK-5
Council Oak Es460PK-5
Daniel Webster Hs3429-12
Daniel Webster Ms3506-8
Disney Es710PK-5
Dolores Huerta Es306PK-5
East Central Hs1,1859-12
East Central Middle School9876-8
Edison Preparatory Ms8226-8
Eisenhower International Es525PK-5
Eliot Es357PK-5
Emerson Es462PK-5
Eugene Field Es343PK-5
Felicitas Mendez Intl School286PK-5
Greenwood Leadership Academy312PK-5
Grissom Es344PK-6
Hamilton Es296PK-5
Hawthorne Es312PK-5
Henry Zarrow International Sch468PK-5
Hoover Es331PK-5
John Hope Franklin Es311PK-5
Kendall-Whittier Es818PK-5
Kerr Es353PK-5
Key Es280PK-5
Lanier Es298PK-5
Lewis And Clark Es437PK-5
Lindbergh Es445PK-5
Macarthur Es395PK-5
Marshall Es266PK-5
Mayo Demonstration Es378PK-5
Mcclure Es399PK-5
Mckinley Es428PK-5
Mclain Hs For Science And Tech7639-12
Memorial Hs1,0369-12
Memorial Ms6266-8
Mitchell Es376PK-5
Monroe Demonstration Ms6886-8
Nathan Hale Hs1,0549-12
Nathan Hale Middle School7826-8
Owen Es385PK-5
Patrick Henry Es473PK-5
Peary Es270PK-5
Project Accept Traice Es558PK-6
Robertson Es229PK-5
Salk Es440PK-5
Sequoyah Es349PK-5
Skelly Es682PK-5
Springdale Es354PK-5
Thomas Edison Preparatory Hs1,0919-12
Thoreau Demonstration Academy4426-8
Traice7799-12
Traice Ms2296-8
Tulsa Met Hs959-12
Tulsa Met Middle School536-8
Unity Learning Academy266PK-5
Wayman Tisdale Fine Arts Acad366PK-5
Whitman Es268PK-5
Will Rogers College Hs1,0029-12
Will Rogers College Ms6946-8

Noteworthy events

2015: Testing reduction

In August 2015, Superintendent Gist announced a 54% reduction in time spent on district-required testing at Tulsa Public Schools. The district had formed an assessment study group that met five times in January 2015 to discuss the rate of testing in the district; Gist attended two of those meetings. The implemented changes sought to "curb over-testing by reducing the frequency of some tests, eliminating one entirely, and by removing the district requirement to implement others." Gist said about the testing reductions, "These decisions were really based on that careful analysis to say where are the places where this information already gathered in another way."[14][15][16]

2013: Overcrowding

Tulsa Public Schools has addressed overcrowding in many of its schools. Due to an efficiency initiative known as Project Schoolhouse, the school district shut down 14 school buildings with low enrollment in 2011. These closures left many schools operating at higher occupancy rates. District leaders said they needed to pay close attention to ensure that schools didn't cross the line between full and overcapacity. Each winter since Project Schoolhouse began, district administrators have conducted an annual site capacity review and the Tulsa school board has subsequently approved adjustments to school boundaries to help balance out student enrollments among sites. In 2013, Tulsa Public Schools reopened a closed elementary school building as a 7th-grade center to help alleviate unexpected crowding at McLain Junior High School. Former Superintendent Keith Ballard believed that Project Schoolhouse was working and that the district could have been eligible to pursue a new bond issue to address capital needs, including classroom additions, in late 2014 or early 2015.[17]

Contact information

TPS logo.jpeg
Tulsa Public Schools
3027 S. New Haven Ave.
Tulsa, OK 74114-6131
Phone: 918-746-6800

About school boards

Education legislation in Oklahoma

Bills are monitored by BillTrack50 and sorted by action history.

See also

Oklahoma School Board Elections News and Analysis
Seal of Oklahoma.png
School Board badge.png
Ballotpedia RSS.jpg

External links

Footnotes

  1. Tulsa Public Schools, "Leadership Team," accessed November 1, 2019
  2. 2.0 2.1 KUTL, "'A dream and an honor': Dr. Ebony Johnson steps into new role as Tulsa interim superintendent," September 17, 2023
  3. News on 6, "TULSA SCHOOL BOARD APPROVES DR. EBONY JOHNSON AS SUPERINTENDENT; WALTERS RESPONDS," December 12, 2023
  4. Tulsa Public Schools, "Leadership Team," accessed November 1, 2019
  5. Tulsa Public Schools, "Supt. Biography," accessed January 19, 2014
  6. Tulsa Public Schools, "School Board Policy Manual," accessed April 5, 2021
  7. Tulsa Public Schools, "School Board Policy Manual," accessed April 24, 2025
  8. Note: This text is quoted verbatim from the original source. Any inconsistencies are attributable to the original source.
  9. National Center for Education Statistics, "Elementary/Secondary Information System," accessed June 17, 2024
  10. Tulsa Public Schools, "2024-2025 SALARY SCHEDULE TEACHERS," accessed April 24, 2025
  11. Oklahoma State Department of Education, "Local Salary Schedules (2022-2023)," accessed January 31,2024
  12. Tulsa Public Schools, "2019-2020 Salary Schedule - Teachers," accessed April 5, 2021
  13. U.S. Department of Education, Washington, DC: EDFacts, "State Assessments in Reading/Language Arts and Mathematics- School Year 2018-19 EDFacts Data Documentation," accessed February 25, 2021
  14. Tulsa World, "Tulsa Public Schools says district-mandated testing time to be reduced by 54 percent," August 4, 2015
  15. Tulsa's Channel 8 KTUL, "Reduction in Testing Means More Control for Teachers," August 4, 2015
  16. Public Radio Tulsa, "Testing to be Trimmed in TPS," August 4, 2015
  17. Tulsa World, "Tulsa Public Schools considering options to alleviate crowding," December 30, 2013