U.S. Supreme Court declines to hear case challenging Chevron deference (2020)
| Administrative State |
|---|
|
| Five Pillars of the Administrative State |
| •Agency control • Executive control • Judicial control •Legislative control • Public Control |
| Click here for more coverage of the administrative state on Ballotpedia.
|
| Click here to access Ballotpedia's administrative state legislation tracker. |
On October 5, the U.S. Supreme Court rejected a challenge against Chevron deference brought by the Children’s Hospital Association of Texas. The association had asked whether courts should give Chevron deference to agency legal interpretations that are different from previous agency interpretations.
Chevron deference is an approach to judicial review that compels federal courts to yield to a federal agency's reasonable interpretation of an ambiguous or unclear statute instead of using the courts’ own interpretation. Judicial deference is one of five pillars key to understanding the main areas of debate about the nature and scope of the administrative state.
The challenge to Chevron came out of a decision issued by the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit.
The association argued in its petition to the U.S. Supreme Court that the D.C. Circuit should not have upheld the rule under Chevron. The petition says, “the court of appeals chose to ‘skip’ Chevron step one, brushed aside canons of statutory construction, and looked past what it acknowledged was a legal error in a key premise of the agency’s rulemaking—the agency’s insistence that its new regulation merely clarified, and was consistent with, existing policy. In numerous ways, this ruling conflicts with decisions from other circuits and this Court."
Judge Karen Henderson, a George H.W. Bush appointee, wrote the opinion for the D.C. Circuit saying, “The familiar Chevron framework guides our review.” She held that the statute was clear, so the court needed only to decide whether the agency’s interpretation was reasonable. Henderson wrote that the rule was consistent with the Medicaid law and upheld it.
Since the U.S. Supreme Court denied review of the case, the 2019 decision of the D.C. Circuit will remain in effect.
See also
- Chevron deference (doctrine)
- Deference (administrative state)
- Five pillars of the administrative state: Judicial control
- Arguments in favor of judicial deference
- Arguments against judicial deference
- Ballotpedia's administrative state coverage
External links
- Search Google News for this topic
- Link to the U.S. Supreme Court order list
- Link to the association petition for a writ of certiorari
- Link to the D.C. Circuit's opinion
Footnotes
