Help us improve in just 2 minutes—share your thoughts in our reader survey.
UNITED STATES ET AL. v. PACIFIC COAST WHOLESALERS' ASSOCIATION ET AL. (1950)

![]() |
UNITED STATES ET AL. v. PACIFIC COAST WHOLESALERS' ASSOCIATION ET AL. |
---|
Term: 1949 |
Important Dates |
Argued: January 10, 1950 |
Decided: February 6, 1950 |
Outcome |
Affirmed (includes modified) |
Vote |
8-0 |
Majority |
Hugo Black • Harold Burton • Tom Clark • Felix Frankfurter • Robert Jackson • Sherman Minton • Stanley Reed • Frederick Vinson |
UNITED STATES ET AL. v. PACIFIC COAST WHOLESALERS' ASSOCIATION ET AL. is a case that was decided by the Supreme Court of the United States on February 6, 1950. The case was argued before the court on January 10, 1950.
In an 8-0 ruling, the U.S. Supreme Court affirmed the ruling of the lower court. The case originated from the California California Southern U.S. District Court.
For a full list of cases decided in the 1940s, click here. For a full list of cases decided by the Vinson Court, click here.
About the case
- Subject matter: Economic Activity - Federal and some few state regulation of transportation regulation:truck, or motor carrier
- Petitioner: Wholesale trade
- Petitioner state: Unknown
- Respondent type: Nonprofit organization or business
- Respondent state: Unknown
- Citation: 338 U.S. 689
- How the court took jurisdiction: Appeal
- What type of decision was made: Per curiam (orally argued)
- Who was the chief justice: Frederick Vinson
- Who wrote the majority opinion: Unknown
These data points were accessed from The Supreme Court Database, which also attempts to categorize the ideological direction of the court's ruling in each case. This case's ruling was categorized as conservative.
See also
- United States Supreme Court cases and courts
- Supreme Court of the United States
- History of the Supreme Court
- United States federal courts
- Ballotpedia's Robe & Gavel newsletter
External links
Footnotes