Your feedback ensures we stay focused on the facts that matter to you most—take our survey
UNITED STATES v. EFRAIN SANTOS AND BENEDICTO DIAZ (2008)

![]() |
UNITED STATES v. EFRAIN SANTOS AND BENEDICTO DIAZ |
---|
Term: 2007 |
Important Dates |
Argued: October 3, 2007 |
Decided: June 2, 2008 |
Outcome |
Affirmed (includes modified) |
Vote |
5-4 |
Judgment of the court |
Antonin Scalia |
Majority |
Ruth Bader Ginsburg • David Souter • Clarence Thomas |
Concurring |
John Paul Stevens |
Dissenting |
Samuel Alito • Stephen Breyer • Anthony Kennedy • John Roberts |
UNITED STATES v. EFRAIN SANTOS AND BENEDICTO DIAZ is a case that was decided by the Supreme Court of the United States on June 2, 2008. The case was argued before the court on October 3, 2007.
In a 5-4 ruling, the U.S. Supreme Court affirmed the ruling of the lower court. The case originated from the Illinois Northern U.S. District Court.
For a full list of cases decided in the 2000s, click here. For a full list of cases decided by the Roberts Court, click here.
About the case
- Subject matter: Criminal Procedure - statutory construction of criminal laws: financial (other than in fraud or internal revenue)
- Petitioner: United States
- Petitioner state: Unknown
- Respondent type: Person accused, indicted, or suspected of crime
- Respondent state: Unknown
- Citation: 553 U.S. 507
- How the court took jurisdiction: Cert
- What type of decision was made: Judgment of the Court (orally argued)
- Who was the chief justice: John Roberts
- Who wrote the majority opinion: Antonin Scalia
These data points were accessed from The Supreme Court Database, which also attempts to categorize the ideological direction of the court's ruling in each case. This case's ruling was categorized as liberal.
See also
- United States Supreme Court cases and courts
- Supreme Court of the United States
- History of the Supreme Court
- United States federal courts
- Ballotpedia's Robe & Gavel newsletter
External links
Footnotes