UNITED STATES v. EURODIF S. A. et al. (2009)
- Justices
- CASES BY TERM
- Supreme Court cases, October term 2025-2026
- Supreme Court cases, October term 2024-2025
- Supreme Court cases, October term 2023-2024
- Supreme Court cases, October term 2022-2023
- Supreme Court cases, October term 2021-2022
- Supreme Court cases, October term 2020-2021
- Supreme Court cases, October term 2019-2020
- Supreme Court cases, October term 2018-2019
- Supreme Court cases, October term 2017-2018
- Supreme Court cases, October term 2016-2017
- Supreme Court cases, October term 2015-2016
- All earlier cases
- HISTORY OF THE COURT
- Recent vacancies
 |
| UNITED STATES v. EURODIF S. A. et al. |
|---|
| Term: 2008 |
| Important Dates |
| Argued: November 4, 2008 |
| Decided: January 26, 2009 |
| Outcome |
| Reversed and remanded |
| Vote |
| 9-0 |
| Majority |
| Samuel Alito • Stephen Breyer • Ruth Bader Ginsburg • Anthony Kennedy • John Roberts • Antonin Scalia • David Souter • John Paul Stevens • Clarence Thomas |
UNITED STATES v. EURODIF S. A. et al. is a case that was decided by the Supreme Court of the United States on January 26, 2009. The case was argued before the court on November 4, 2008.
In a 9-0 ruling, the U.S. Supreme Court reversed the ruling of the lower court and remanded the case for further proceedings consistent with the Court's opinion. The case originated from the U.S. Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.
For a full list of cases decided in the 2000s, click here. For a full list of cases decided by the Roberts Court, click here.
About the case
- Subject matter: Economic Activity - Federal and some few state regulation of public utilities regulation: nuclear power
- Petitioner: United States
- Petitioner state: Unknown
- Respondent type: foreign (non-American) nongovernmental entity
- Respondent state: Unknown
- Citation: 555 U.S. 305
- How the court took jurisdiction: Cert
- What type of decision was made: Opinion of the court (orally argued)
- Who was the chief justice: John Roberts
- Who wrote the majority opinion: David Souter
These data points were accessed from The Supreme Court Database, which also attempts to categorize the ideological direction of the court's ruling in each case. This case's ruling was categorized as liberal.
See also
- United States Supreme Court cases and courts
- Supreme Court of the United States
- History of the Supreme Court
- United States federal courts
- Ballotpedia's Robe & Gavel newsletter
External links
Footnotes
