UNITED STATES v. JAMES DANIEL GOOD REAL PROPERTY et al. (1993)

UNITED STATES v. JAMES DANIEL GOOD REAL PROPERTY et al.
	Term: 1993
Important Dates
	Argued: October 6, 1993
	Decided: December 13, 1993
Outcome
	Affirmed and reversed (or vacated) in part and remanded
Vote
	5-4
Majority
	Harry Blackmun • Ruth Bader Ginsburg • Anthony Kennedy • David Souter • John Paul Stevens
Dissenting
	Sandra Day O'Connor • William Rehnquist • Antonin Scalia • Clarence Thomas

UNITED STATES v. JAMES DANIEL GOOD REAL PROPERTY et al. is a case that was decided by the Supreme Court of the United States on December 13, 1993. The case was argued before the court on October 6, 1993.

In a 5-4 ruling, the U.S. Supreme Court affirmed and reversed (or vacated) in part the ruling of the lower court and remanded the case for further proceedings consistent with the Court's opinion. The case originated from the Hawaii U.S. District Court.

For a full list of cases decided in the 1990s, click here. For a full list of cases decided by the Rehnquist Court, click here.

^[1]

About the case

Subject matter: Due Process - due process: hearing or notice (other than as pertains to government employees or prisoners' rights)
Petitioner: United States
Petitioner state: Unknown
Respondent type: Owner, landlord, or claimant to ownership, fee interest, or possession of land as well as chattels
Respondent state: Unknown
Citation: 510 U.S. 43
How the court took jurisdiction: Cert
What type of decision was made: Opinion of the court (orally argued)
Who was the chief justice: William Rehnquist
Who wrote the majority opinion: Anthony Kennedy

These data points were accessed from The Supreme Court Database, which also attempts to categorize the ideological direction of the court's ruling in each case. This case's ruling was categorized as liberal.