Your monthly support provides voters the knowledge they need to make confident decisions at the polls. Donate today.
UNITED STATES v. REYNOLDS ET AL. (1953)

![]() |
UNITED STATES v. REYNOLDS ET AL. |
---|
Term: 1952 |
Important Dates |
Argued: October 21, 1952 |
Decided: March 9, 1953 |
Outcome |
Reversed and remanded |
Vote |
6-3 |
Majority |
Harold Burton • Tom Clark • William Douglas • Sherman Minton • Stanley Reed • Frederick Vinson |
Dissenting |
Hugo Black • Felix Frankfurter • Robert Jackson |
UNITED STATES v. REYNOLDS ET AL. is a case that was decided by the Supreme Court of the United States on March 9, 1953. The case was argued before the court on October 21, 1952.
In a 6-3 ruling, the U.S. Supreme Court reversed the ruling of the lower court and remanded the case for further proceedings consistent with the Court's opinion. The case originated from the Pennsylvania Pennsylvania Eastern U.S. District Court.
For a full list of cases decided in the 1950s, click here. For a full list of cases decided by the Vinson Court, click here.
About the case
- Subject matter: Privacy - Freedom of Information Act and related federal or state statutes or regulations
- Petitioner: United States
- Petitioner state: Unknown
- Respondent type: Physically injured person, including wrongful death, who is not an employee
- Respondent state: Unknown
- Citation: 345 U.S. 1
- How the court took jurisdiction: Cert
- What type of decision was made: Opinion of the court (orally argued)
- Who was the chief justice: Frederick Vinson
- Who wrote the majority opinion: Frederick Vinson
These data points were accessed from The Supreme Court Database, which also attempts to categorize the ideological direction of the court's ruling in each case. This case's ruling was categorized as conservative.
See also
- United States Supreme Court cases and courts
- Supreme Court of the United States
- History of the Supreme Court
- United States federal courts
- Ballotpedia's Robe & Gavel newsletter
External links
Footnotes