UNITED STATES v. WHITE MOUNTAIN APACHE TRIBE (2003)

![]() |
UNITED STATES v. WHITE MOUNTAIN APACHE TRIBE |
---|
Term: 2002 |
Important Dates |
Argued: December 2, 2002 |
Decided: March 4, 2003 |
Outcome |
Affirmed (includes modified) |
Vote |
5-4 |
Majority |
Sandra Day O'Connor • David Souter • John Paul Stevens |
Concurring |
Stephen Breyer • Ruth Bader Ginsburg |
Dissenting |
Anthony Kennedy • William Rehnquist • Antonin Scalia • Clarence Thomas |
UNITED STATES v. WHITE MOUNTAIN APACHE TRIBE is a case that was decided by the Supreme Court of the United States on March 4, 2003. The case was argued before the court on December 2, 2002.
In a 5-4 ruling, the U.S. Supreme Court affirmed the ruling of the lower court. The case originated from the U.S. Court of Claims, Court of Federal Claims.
For a full list of cases decided in the 2000s, click here. For a full list of cases decided by the Rehnquist Court, click here.
About the case
- Subject matter: Civil Rights - Indians (other than pertains to state jurisdiction over)
- Petitioner: United States
- Petitioner state: Unknown
- Respondent type: Indian, including Indian tribe or nation
- Respondent state: Unknown
- Citation: 537 U.S. 465
- How the court took jurisdiction: Cert
- What type of decision was made: Opinion of the court (orally argued)
- Who was the chief justice: William Rehnquist
- Who wrote the majority opinion: David Souter
These data points were accessed from The Supreme Court Database, which also attempts to categorize the ideological direction of the court's ruling in each case. This case's ruling was categorized as liberal.
See also
- United States Supreme Court cases and courts
- Supreme Court of the United States
- History of the Supreme Court
- United States federal courts
- Ballotpedia's Robe & Gavel newsletter
External links
Footnotes