Help us improve in just 2 minutes—share your thoughts in our reader survey.
UNITE HERE LOCAL 355 v. MULHALL (2013)

![]() |
UNITE HERE LOCAL 355 v. MULHALL |
---|
Term: 2013 |
Important Dates |
Argued: November 13, 2013 |
Decided: December 10, 2013 |
Outcome |
Petition denied or appeal dismissed |
Vote |
6-3 |
Majority |
Samuel Alito • Ruth Bader Ginsburg • Anthony Kennedy • John Roberts • Antonin Scalia • Clarence Thomas |
Dissenting |
Stephen Breyer • Elena Kagan • Sonia Sotomayor |
UNITE HERE LOCAL 355 v. MULHALL is a case that was decided by the Supreme Court of the United States on December 10, 2013. The case was argued before the court on November 13, 2013.
In a 6-3 ruling, the U.S. Supreme Court dismissed the case. The case originated from the Florida Southern U.S. District Court.
For a full list of cases decided in the 2010s, click here. For a full list of cases decided by the Roberts Court, click here.
About the case
- Subject matter: Unions - Labor-management disputes: bargaining
- Petitioner: Union, labor organization, or official of
- Petitioner state: Unknown
- Respondent type: Employee, or job applicant, including beneficiaries of
- Respondent state: Unknown
- Citation: 571 U.S. 83
- How the court took jurisdiction: Cert
- What type of decision was made: Per curiam (orally argued)
- Who was the chief justice: John Roberts
- Who wrote the majority opinion: Unknown
These data points were accessed from The Supreme Court Database, which also attempts to categorize the ideological direction of the court's ruling in each case. This case's ruling was categorized as conservative.
See also
- United States Supreme Court cases and courts
- Supreme Court of the United States
- History of the Supreme Court
- United States federal courts
- Ballotpedia's Robe & Gavel newsletter
External links
Footnotes