United States House of Representatives elections, 2016
In order to flip control of the chamber, the Democratic Party needs to pick up 30 seats, a difficult task. Presidential elections tend to result in smaller changes to House partisan balance than midterms. The last two presidential elections saw gains of only eight and 24 seats for Democrats.[1][2] While it is unlikely that the Democratic Party will be able to gain control of the chamber in this election cycle, Democrats can still hope to reduce the majority that the Republican Party holds. Republicans currently hold their largest majority in the U.S. House since 1928.[3]
The coinciding presidential election is likely to have a significant impact on the elections for U.S. House. Presidential election years lead to increased voter interest and turnout, which has an effect all the way down the ballot. In the past decade, presidential elections have led to Democratic gains in the U.S. House, while midterms have helped Republicans. If the trend holds, Democrats should look to pick up some seats in November.[3]
Speaker of the House John Boehner resigned in October 2015.[4] Two other Republicans already resigned from their seats and another died in office. Michael Grimm represented New York's 11th Congressional District but resigned after he pleaded guilty to felony tax evasion. Aaron Schock resigned on March 31, 2015, following inquiries into misuse of campaign and government funds. He represented Illinois' 18th Congressional District.[5] Alan Nunnelee represented Mississippi's 1st Congressional District and died on February 6, 2015, following his battle with brain cancer.[6] Democrats have lost two members as well. Chaka Fattah of Pennsylvania's 2nd Congressional District resigned following a racketeering conviction, while Mark Takai (HI-01) died in July 2016 following a battle with pancreatic cancer.[7][8] Special elections will be held to replace any representatives who leave office early.
Partisan breakdown
The Republican Party currently has the majority in the U.S. House. Republicans hold 247 seats compared to Democrats' 187 seats. The Republican Party increased its hold on the House in the 2014 midterms when it picked up 15 seats while only losing two. In order to gain control of the House, Democrats would need to gain 30 seats in 2016.
| U.S. House Partisan Breakdown | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Party | As of August 2016 | After the 2016 Election | |
| Democratic Party | 186 | Pending | |
| Republican Party | 247 | Pending | |
| Vacant | 2 | ||
| Total | 435 | 435 | |
Retiring incumbents
The following members of the U.S. House have decided to retire rather than seek re-election in 2016.
| Name: | Party: | Current office: |
|---|---|---|
| Ander Crenshaw | Florida, District 4 | |
| Candice Miller | Michigan, District 10 | |
| Charles B. Rangel | New York, District 13 | |
| Chris Gibson | New York, District 19 | |
| Curt Clawson | Florida, District 19 | |
| Cynthia Lummis | Wyoming, At-Large, District | |
| Dan Benishek | Michigan, District 1 | |
| Ed Whitfield | Kentucky, District 1 | |
| Gwen Graham | Florida, District 2 | |
| Janice Hahn | California, District 44 | |
| Jeff Miller | Florida, District 1 | |
| Jim McDermott | Washington, District 7 | |
| John Kline | Minnesota, District 2 | |
| Joseph R. Pitts | Pennsylvania, District 16 | |
| Lois Capps | California, District 24 | |
| Lynn A. Westmoreland | Georgia, District 3 | |
| Mark Takai | Hawaii, District 1 | |
| Matt Salmon | Arizona, District 5 | |
| Michael G. Fitzpatrick | Pennsylvania, District 8 | |
| Randy Neugebauer | Texas, District 19 | |
| Reid Ribble | Wisconsin, District 8 | |
| Richard L. Hanna | New York, District 22 | |
| Richard B. Nugent | Florida, District 11 | |
| Robert Hurt | Virginia, District 5 | |
| Rubén Hinojosa | Texas, District 15 | |
| Sam Farr | California, District 20 | |
| Scott Rigell | Virginia, District 2 | |
| Stephen Lee Fincher | Tennessee, District 8 | |
| Steve Israel | New York, District 3 |
Incumbents seeking higher office
The following incumbents are not seeking re-election to the U.S. House. They are instead seeking election to another office in 2016.
U.S. Senate
| Name: | Party: | Current office: |
|---|---|---|
| Alan Grayson | Florida, District 9 | |
| Ann Kirkpatrick | Arizona, District 1 | |
| Chris Van Hollen | U.S. House, Maryland, District 8 | |
| Donna Edwards | Maryland, District 4 | |
| Joe Heck | Nevada, District 3 | |
| Loretta Sanchez | California, District 46 | |
| Marlin A. Stutzman | Indiana, District 3 | |
| Patrick Murphy | Florida, District 18 | |
| Tammy Duckworth | Illinois, District 8 | |
| Todd C. Young | Indiana, District 9 |
Governor
| Name: | Party: | Current office: |
|---|---|---|
| John C. Carney Jr. | U.S. House, Delaware, At-Large District |
Battleground races
This table displays the criteria used to determine competitiveness in more specific detail. It gives ranges for each criterion and the competitiveness associated with them. Each district was analyzed using this as a baseline to determine competitiveness.
| Color Key | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Color | Margin of Victory (MOV) | Presidential MOV % | Incumbent term in office | Open seat? | Cook rating | |
| Purple- most competitive | 0.0-4.9 | 0.0-4.9 | 1 | Yes | Toss-up | |
| Orange- very competitive | 5.0-7.9 | 5.0-7.9 | 2-3 | N/A | Lean D/R | |
| Green- competitive | 8.0-10.0 | 8.0-10.0 | 4-5 | N/A | Likely D/R | |
| House winners labeled this color indicate the party of the winner being different from the party of the presidential winner of the state in 2012 | ||||||
The following races are those that are expected to be the most competitive in 2016. By that, we mean that the expected margin of victory for the following races will be under 5 percent.
| Most competitive 2016 House elections | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| District | Incumbent's party | District MOV 2014 | District MOV 2012 | Presidential MOV 2012 | Presidential MOV 2008 | Incumbent term in office | Open seat? | Cook rating | |||
| Arizona's 1st | Democratic | 5.2 | 3.6 | -2.5 | -3.2 | 2 | Yes | Toss Up | |||
| Arizona's 2nd | Republican | 0.1 | 0.8 | -1.5 | -0.9 | 1 | No | Lean R | |||
| California's 7th | Democratic | 0.8 | 3.4 | ✓4.0 | ✓5.0 | 2 | No | Lean D | |||
| California's 25th | Republican | 6.7 | 9.6 | -1.9 | ✓1.0 | 1 | No | Toss Up | |||
| Colorado's 6th | Republican | 8.9 | 2.0 | ✓5.1 | ✓8.7 | 4 | No | Toss Up | |||
| Florida's 18th | Democratic | 19.6 | 0.6 | -4.1 | ✓3.1 | 2 | Yes | Toss Up | |||
| Florida's 26th | Republican | 2.9 | 10.6 | ✓6.7 | -0.4 | 1 | No | Toss Up | |||
| Illinois' 10th | Republican | 2.6 | 1.3 | ✓16.4 | ✓27.1 | 1 | No | Toss Up | |||
| Iowa's 1st | Republican | 2.3 | 15.4 | ✓13.7 | ✓18.1 | 1 | No | Lean D | |||
| Iowa's 3rd | Republican | 10.5 | 8.6 | ✓4.2 | ✓6.1 | 1 | No | Toss Up | |||
| Maine's 2nd | Republican | 5.0 | 15.7 | ✓9.0 | ✓12 | 1 | No | Toss Up | |||
| Michigan's 1st | Republican | 6.9 | 0.5 | -8.3 | ✓1.3 | 3 | Yes | Lean R | |||
| Minnesota's 2nd | Republican | 17.2 | 8.2 | ✓0.1 | ✓2.9 | 7 | Yes | Lean D | |||
| Nebraska's 2nd | Democratic | 3.3 | 1.6 | -7.0 | ✓1.0 | 1 | No | Toss Up | |||
| Nevada's 3rd | Republican | 24.6 | 7.5 | ✓0.8 | ✓8.9 | 3 | Yes | Toss Up | |||
| Nevada's 4th | Republican | 2.8 | 8.0 | ✓10.7 | ✓15.0 | 1 | No | Lean D | |||
| New Hampshire's 1st | Republican | 3.6 | 3.8 | ✓1.6 | ✓6.4 | 1 | No | Toss Up | |||
| New York's 1st | Republican | 8.7 | 4.6 | ✓0.5 | ✓3.0 | 1 | No | Toss Up | |||
| New York's 3rd | Democratic | 9.2 | 5.0 | ✓2.6 | ✓8.0 | 2 | Yes | Toss Up | |||
| New York's 19th | Republican | 28.1 | 5.3 | ✓6.2 | ✓8.0 | 3 | Yes | Toss Up | |||
| New York's 22nd | Republican | 48.1 | 19.9 | -0.4 | 0.0 | 3 | Yes | Toss Up | |||
| New York's 24th | Republican | 18.8 | 5.3 | ✓15.9 | ✓14.0 | 1 | No | Toss Up | |||
| Pennsylvania's 8th | Republican | 23.8 | 13.2 | -0.1 | ✓7.5 | 3 | Yes | Toss Up | |||
| Texas' 23rd | Republican | 2.1 | 4.8 | -2.6 | ✓1.0 | 1 | No | Toss Up | |||
| Wisconsin's 8th | Republican | 30.1 | 12 | -3.7 | ✓8.7 | 3 | Yes | Toss Up | |||
- Both the 2012 and 2008 presidential MOV have either "✓" or "-" before the number. The "✓" indicates the district went in favor of the winner, in both years this was President Obama. The "-" indicates the district favored the Republican who lost in each election, Romney in 2012 and McCain in 2008.
The following races, while not currently rated as battlegrounds, have the potential to become battleground districts as the races take shape throughout 2016. They are all expected to be at least somewhat competitive, but they are not considered among the most competitive races.
| Races to watch | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| District | Incumbent's Party | District MOV 2014 | District MOV 2012 | Presidential MOV 2012 | Presidential MOV 2008 | Incumbent term in office | Open seat? | Cook rating | |||
| California's 10th | Republican | 12.3 | 5.4 | ✓3.6 | ✓3.0 | 3 | No | Lean R | |||
| Michigan's 7th | Republican | 12.3 | 10.3 | -3.1 | ✓3.4 | 3 | No | Lean R | |||
| Minnesota's 8th | Democratic | 1.4 | 8.9 | ✓5.5 | ✓8.6 | 2 | No | Lean D | |||
| New Jersey's 5th | Republican | 12.1 | 12.3 | -3.1 | -2.0 | 7 | No | Lean R | |||
| New York's 21st | Republican | 20.5 | 1.9 | ✓6.1 | ✓5.0 | 1 | No | Likely R | |||
| Utah's 4th | Republican | 3.3 | 0.3 | -37 | -15.2 | 1 | No | Toss-Up | |||
| Virginia's 10th | Republican | 16.1 | 19.7 | -1.1 | ✓2.8 | 1 | No | Lean R | |||
- Both the 2012 and 2008 presidential MOV have either "✓" or "-" before the number. The "✓" indicates the district went in favor of the winner, in both years this was President Obama. The "-" indicates the district favored the Republican who lost in each election, Romney in 2012 and McCain in 2008.
Defeated incumbents
Four incumbent members of Congress have lost their primary elections. Three of the four incumbents who lost faced unusual circumstances leading up to their primaries. One had been made vulnerable because of a criminal investigation, and two were defeated following major changes to their districts due to redistricting.
Chaka Fattah
Chaka Fattah was the first incumbent to lose a primary in 2016. Fattah was defeated by Dwight Evans in the Democratic primary on April 26, 2016. Fattah represented Pennsylvania's 2nd Congressional District from 1994 until his resignation on June 23, 2016. Heading into the election, Fattah had been made vulnerable due to an indictment in 2015 on charges of bribery, money laundering, and bank and mail fraud, among other charges. Fattah was ultimately convicted of all charges in June and resigned shortly thereafter.[9][10][11][12]
| U.S. House, Pennsylvania District 2 Democratic Primary, 2016 | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Candidate | Vote % | Votes | ||
|
|
42.3% | 75,515 | ||
| Chaka Fattah Incumbent | 34.4% | 61,518 | ||
| Brian Gordon | 13.2% | 23,655 | ||
| Dan Muroff | 10.1% | 18,016 | ||
| Total Votes | 178,704 | |||
| Source: Pennsylvania Department of State |
||||
Renee Ellmers
Renee Ellmers was the second incumbent to fall in 2016. Ellmers was defeated by fellow GOP incumbent George Holding in North Carolina's 2nd Congressional District Republican primary. Holding represented the 13th Congressional District heading into the election, but redistricting altered both districts significantly, causing Holding to seek re-election in the 2nd District. Heading into the primary, Holding was a clear favorite. He had the backing of a number of Republican organizations, including Americans for Prosperity, FreedomWorks, and the Club for Growth. However, Ellmers did secure a late endorsement from Donald Trump. Holding easily defeated Ellmers, receiving over twice as many votes.[13][14][15][16][17]
| U.S. House, North Carolina District 2 Republican Primary, 2016 | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Candidate | Vote % | Votes | ||
|
|
53.4% | 17,084 | ||
| Renee Ellmers Incumbent | 23.6% | 7,552 | ||
| Greg Brannon | 23% | 7,359 | ||
| Total Votes | 31,995 | |||
| Source: North Carolina State Board of Elections |
||||
Randy Forbes
Randy Forbes was defeated in Virginia's 2nd Congressional District Republican primary on June 14, 2016, by state Del. Scott Taylor. Forbes, who represented the 4th Congressional District heading into the election, chose to seek re-election in District 2 after redistricting left his seat as a likely Democratic pickup in the general election. Forbes chose the second district because it was open following incumbent Scott Rigell's decision not to seek re-election. Forbes' move to the 2nd District made him vulnerable as the district was entirely outside of his constituency, leading to him being portrayed as an outsider. As a result, Taylor easily defeated Forbes by a margin of nearly 12 percent.[18][19]
| U.S. House, Virginia District 2 Republican Primary, 2016 | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Candidate | Vote % | Votes | ||
|
|
52.6% | 21,406 | ||
| Randy Forbes Incumbent | 40.6% | 16,552 | ||
| Pat Cardwell | 6.8% | 2,773 | ||
| Total Votes | 40,731 | |||
| Source: Virginia Department of Elections |
||||
Tim Huelskamp
Tim Huelskamp was defeated in Kansas' 1st Congressional District Republican primary on August 2, 2016, by physician Roger Marshall. Huelskamp lost by a significant margin of 13 percent. Outside groups took an interest in the primary battle between Huelskamp and Marshall. In a reversal of the usual narrative, Huelskamp, the incumbent, was supported by the more conservative, anti-establishment wing of the Republican Party, while the challenger, Marshall, received the backing of groups normally associated with establishment Republicans. Huelskamp was endorsed by Sen. Ted Cruz and the Club for Growth, while Marshall received endorsements from the Kansas Farm Bureau and the U.S. Chamber of Commerce.[20][21]
| U.S. House, Kansas District 1 Republican Primary, 2016 | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Candidate | Vote % | Votes | ||
|
|
56.5% | 58,808 | ||
| Tim Huelskamp Incumbent | 43.5% | 45,315 | ||
| Total Votes | 104,123 | |||
| Source: Politico Note: Vote totals above are unofficial and will be updated once official totals are made available. |
||||
Primary competitiveness
Primary competitiveness measures the percentage of primary elections in which voters actually have a choice to make. In most cases this means those primaries in which there are two or more candidates running. However, in states that use a top-two primary system, a primary must have at least three candidates running to be considered contested. Candidates who have declared write-in campaigns are not enough for a race to be considered contested.
In 2016, 44.53 percent of all major-party primaries were contested. If you exclude California and Washington, the two states which use a top-two primary system, 41.53 percent of primaries were contested. As in the past several election cycles, Republican candidates faced significantly more primary opposition than Democratic ones. In Republican contests 46.17 percent of primaries were contested, while 36.89 percent of Democratic primaries were contested.
Incumbents sought re-election in 90 percent of U.S. House districts. Party made no real difference in the percentage of incumbents who sought re-election. However as was the case in overall primary races, Republican incumbents were more likely to face a primary challenger than Democratic incumbents. In Republican primary races featuring an incumbent, 52.25 percent of races were contested, while 44.71 percent of Democratic incumbents seeking re-election faced a primary challenger. With only six states yet to hold primaries, only four incumbents have been defeated in primary elections. This amounts to just over one percent, which is the average over the past decade.
| The map below displays the percentage of contested primary races in each state. • Filing deadline data is being used for states that haven't yet held their primaries. Slight inaccuracies may arise if filed candidates withdraw prior to the primary. • Louisiana doesn't hold a primary. All candidates compete in the general election and a runoff is held if no candidate secures at least 50% of the vote. |
Full data regarding general competitiveness and competition in races involving an incumbent can be found in the tables below.
| Contested Primaries during the 2016 Congressional Elections | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| State | Primary date | # of seats | Democratic contested primaries | Republican contested primaries | Contested Major Party primaries | % contested primaries |
| Alabama | 3/1 | 7 | 0 | 4 | 4 | 28.57% |
| Arkansas | 3/1 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 12.50% |
| Texas | 3/1 | 36 | 13 | 20 | 33 | 45.83% |
| Mississippi | 3/8 | 4 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 37.50% |
| Illinois | 3/15 | 18 | 8 | 6 | 14 | 38.89% |
| Ohio | 3/15 | 16 | 5 | 5 | 10 | 31.25% |
| Maryland | 4/26 | 8 | 7 | 8 | 15 | 93.75% |
| Pennsylvania | 4/26 | 18 | 4 | 5 | 9 | 25.00% |
| Indiana | 5/3 | 9 | 8 | 8 | 16 | 88.89% |
| Nebraska | 5/10 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 16.67% |
| West Virginia | 5/10 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 33.33% |
| Idaho | 5/17 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 75.00% |
| Kentucky | 5/17 | 6 | 1 | 4 | 5 | 41.67% |
| Oregon | 5/17 | 5 | 3 | 4 | 7 | 70.00% |
| Georgia | 5/24 | 14 | 2 | 7 | 9 | 32.14% |
| California | 6/7 | 53 | 40 | 40 | 40 | 75.47% |
| Iowa | 6/7 | 4 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.00% |
| Montana | 6/7 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00% |
| New Jersey | 6/7 | 12 | 6 | 4 | 10 | 41.67% |
| New Mexico | 6/7 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 16.67% |
| South Dakota | 6/7 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00% |
| North Carolina | 6/7 | 13 | 6 | 10 | 16 | 61.54% |
| Maine | 6/14 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 25.00% |
| Nevada | 6/14 | 4 | 4 | 3 | 7 | 87.50% |
| North Dakota | 6/14 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00% |
| South Carolina | 6/14 | 7 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 21.43% |
| Virginia | 6/14 | 11 | 2 | 5 | 7 | 31.82% |
| Colorado | 6/28 | 7 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 28.57% |
| New York | 6/28 | 27 | 10 | 3 | 13 | 24.07% |
| Oklahoma | 6/28 | 5 | 3 | 5 | 8 | 80.00% |
| Utah | 6/28 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 12.50% |
| Kansas | 8/2/2016 | 4 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.00% |
| Michigan | 8/2/2016 | 14 | 3 | 3 | 6 | 21.43% |
| Missouri | 8/2/2016 | 8 | 5 | 8 | 13 | 81.25% |
| Washington | 8/2/2016 | 10 | 10 | 100.00% | ||
| Tennessee | 8/4/2016 | 9 | 4 | 6 | 10 | 55.56% |
| Connecticut | 8/9/2016 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00% |
| Minnesota | 8/9/2016 | 8 | 3 | 5 | 8 | 50.00% |
| Vermont | 8/9/2016 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00% |
| Wisconsin | 8/9/2016 | 8 | 5 | 3 | 8 | 50.00% |
| Hawaii | 8/13/2016 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 75.00% |
| Alaska | 8/16/2016 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 100.00% |
| Wyoming | 8/16/2016 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 100.00% |
| Arizona | 8/30/2016 | 9 | 5 | 6 | 11 | 61.11% |
| Florida | 8/30/2016 | 27 | 11 | 13 | 24 | 44.44% |
| Massachusetts | 9/8/2016 | 9 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 5.56% |
| Delaware | 9/13/2016 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 50.00% |
| New Hampshire | 9/13/2016 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 50.00% |
| Rhode Island | 9/13/2016 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 50.00% |
| Contested Primaries involving incumbents during the 2016 Congressional Elections | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| State | Primary date | # of seats | Incs running | Democratic incs facing primary | Republican incs facing primary | % incs with primary |
| Alabama | 3/1 | 7 | 7 | 0 | 4 | 57.14% |
| Arkansas | 3/1 | 4 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 25.00% |
| Texas | 3/1 | 36 | 34 | 5 | 14 | 55.88% |
| Mississippi | 3/8 | 4 | 4 | 0 | 2 | 50.00% |
| Illinois | 3/15 | 18 | 17 | 4 | 3 | 41.18% |
| Ohio | 3/15 | 16 | 15 | 1 | 3 | 26.67% |
| Maryland | 4/26 | 8 | 6 | 4 | 1 | 83.33% |
| Pennsylvania | 4/26 | 18 | 16 | 2 | 2 | 25.00% |
| Indiana | 5/3 | 9 | 7 | 2 | 5 | 100.00% |
| Nebraska | 5/10 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0.00% |
| West Virginia | 5/10 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 33.33% |
| Idaho | 5/17 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 100.00% |
| Kentucky | 5/17 | 6 | 5 | 0 | 2 | 40.00% |
| Oregon | 5/17 | 5 | 5 | 3 | 1 | 80.00% |
| Georgia | 5/24 | 14 | 13 | 0 | 5 | 38.46% |
| California | 6/7 | 53 | 49 | 23 | 13 | 73.47% |
| Iowa | 6/7 | 4 | 4 | 0 | 2 | 50.00% |
| Montana | 6/7 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0.00% |
| New Jersey | 6/7 | 12 | 12 | 3 | 4 | 58.33% |
| New Mexico | 6/7 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0.00% |
| South Dakota | 6/7 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0.00% |
| North Carolina | 6/7 | 13 | 13 | 1 | 8 | 69.23% |
| Maine | 6/14 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0.00% |
| Nevada | 6/14 | 4 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 66.67% |
| North Dakota | 6/14 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0.00% |
| South Carolina | 6/14 | 7 | 7 | 0 | 2 | 28.57% |
| Virginia | 6/14 | 11 | 8 | 0 | 1 | 12.50% |
| Colorado | 6/28 | 7 | 7 | 1 | 2 | 42.86% |
| New York | 6/28 | 27 | 23 | 5 | 0 | 21.74% |
| Oklahoma | 6/28 | 5 | 5 | 0 | 5 | 100.00% |
| Utah | 6/28 | 4 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 25.00% |
| Kansas | 8/2/2016 | 4 | 4 | 0 | 2 | 50.00% |
| Michigan | 8/2/2016 | 14 | 12 | 2 | 1 | 25.00% |
| Missouri | 8/2/2016 | 8 | 8 | 2 | 6 | 100.00% |
| Washington | 8/2/2016 | 10 | 9 | 5 | 4 | 100.00% |
| Tennessee | 8/4/2016 | 9 | 7 | 1 | 4 | 71.43% |
| Connecticut | 8/9/2016 | 5 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0.00% |
| Minnesota | 8/9/2016 | 8 | 7 | 2 | 1 | 42.86% |
| Vermont | 8/9/2016 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0.00% |
| Wisconsin | 8/9/2016 | 8 | 7 | 2 | 2 | 57.14% |
| Hawaii | 8/13/2016 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 100.00% |
| Alaska | 8/16/2016 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 100.00% |
| Wyoming | 8/16/2016 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00% |
| Arizona | 8/30/2016 | 9 | 7 | 1 | 3 | 57.14% |
| Florida | 8/30/2016 | 27 | 20 | 3 | 6 | 45.00% |
| Massachusetts | 9/8/2016 | 9 | 9 | 0 | 0 | 0.00% |
| Delaware | 9/13/2016 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00% |
| New Hampshire | 9/13/2016 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 50.00% |
| Rhode Island | 9/13/2016 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 100.00% |
Presidential impact
Presidential elections have a significant impact on congressional elections, the most obvious of which is increased voter interest and participation. In the last two decades, presidential elections have led to roughly 15 to 20 percent higher turnout rates than in the corresponding midterm.[22] The following chart shows the disparity between voter turnout in presidential elections and midterms.
In the past decade, presidential elections have benefited the Democratic Party, while midterms have helped Republicans. The Democratic Party gained an average of 16 house seats in the last two presidential elections, and the Republican Party picked up an average of 38.5 seats in the last two midterms.[3] Should this trend continue, Democrats stand to gain some ground in 2016.
| Past partisan breakdowns | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Year | Democrats | Republicans | Net change | |
| 2014 | 188 | 247 | +13 R | |
| 2012 | 201 | 234 | +8 D | |
| 2010 | 193 | 242 | +64 R | |
| 2008 | 257 | 178 | +24 D | |
| 2006 | 233 | 202 | +22 D | |
Committees
NRCC
The National Republican Congressional Committee (NRCC) focuses on building and maintaining a Republican majority in the U.S. House of Representatives.[23]
The committee was founded in 1866.[23] According to the NRCC website, the committee:
| “ | ...supports the election of Republicans to the House through direct financial contributions to candidates and Republican Party organizations; technical and research assistance to Republican candidates and Party organizations; voter registration, education and turnout programs; and other Party-building activities."[23][24] | ” |
The current NRCC chairman is Rep. Greg Walden (OR-2).[23]
NRCC targets
The following Democratic incumbents are targeted by the National Republican Congressional Committee (NRCC) heading into 2016.
| National Republican Congressional Committee, Targeted incumbents | ||
|---|---|---|
| District | Incumbent | Open seat? |
| Arizona's 1st District | Ann Kirkpatrick | Yes |
| Arizona's 9th District | Kyrsten Sinema | No |
| California's 3rd District | John Garamendi | No |
| California's 7th District | Ami Bera | No |
| California's 26th District | Julia Brownley | No |
| California's 31st District | Pete Aguilar | No |
| California's 36th District | Raul Ruiz | No |
| California's 52nd District | Scott Peters | No |
| Connecticut's 5th District | Elizabeth Esty | No |
| Florida's 2nd District | Gwen Graham | No |
| Florida's 18th District | Patrick Murphy | Yes |
| Illinois' 17th District | Cheri Bustos | No |
| Minnesota's 7th District | Collin Peterson | No |
| Minnesota's 8th District | Rick Nolan | No |
| Nebraska's 2nd District | Brad Ashford | No |
| New Hampshire's 2nd District | Ann McLane Kuster | No |
| New Mexico's 3rd District | Ben Ray Lujan | No |
| New York's 3rd District | Steve Israel | No |
| New York's 18th District | Sean Maloney | No |
Patriot Program
The NRCC's Patriot Program is designed to help raise money and assist vulnerable incumbents seeking re-election. NRCC Chairman Greg Walden said of those in the program:
| “ | Our new Patriots have just shown that they know what it takes to run aggressive, organized, and winning campaigns. They have hit the ground running here in Washington and are tirelessly working hard to help grow the economy and fight for the hard working families and small businesses in their districts. I am proud to call them colleagues and am looking forward to helping ensure that they are able to win re-election and continue to serve beyond 2016.[25][24] | ” |
Young Guns
The NRCC announced the initial 32 candidates of its Young Guns program on November 19, 2015. The Young Guns program "supports and mentors challenger and open-seat candidates in races across the country." NRCC Chairman Greg Walden said of the candidates, "These 32 candidates all provide a stark contrast to their liberal opponents, whose support of bigger government, more spending and President Obama’s job-destroying agenda have steered our country down a dangerous path. With working families still struggling in this weak economy and our national security under increasing threats, we must elect more Republicans to Congress who will work to strengthen our nation. I am confident that these candidates will continue to work hard for their communities and build strong campaigns as we head into the election year."[26]
The NRCC added 11 more candidates to its Young Guns program on February 18, 2016.[27]
DCCC
The Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee (DCCC) supports campaigns of Democratic candidates for the U.S. House.[23]
According to the DCCC website, the Committee is:
| “ | ” |
The current chairman is Rep. Ben Ray Lujan (NM-3).[29]
Frontline
The DCCC's Frontline program is designed to assist Democratic incumbents who represent vulnerable districts. Chairman Ben Ray Lujan said of the program:
| “ | Each one of these members knows what it takes to win tough elections: working hard, standing up for your district, and not taking anything for granted. We are adding them to our Frontline Program, led by Representative Dan Kildee, to maximize their resources and ensure they are able to keep fighting to strengthen middle class economics. You don’t add by subtracting, so the success of our Members is integral to our plan to stay on offense in 2016.[30][24] | ” |
The DCCC announced the first 14 members of the 2016 Frontline Program on February 12, 2015. The following table displays the current members of the Frontline Program.[31]
| Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee Frontline Program 2016 | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| District | Incumbent | Open seat? | ||
| Arizona's 1st District | Ann Kirkpatrick | Yes | ||
| Arizona's 9th District | Kyrsten Sinema | No | ||
| California's 7th District | Ami Bera | No | ||
| California's 26th District | Julia Brownley | No | ||
| California's 31st District | Pete Aguilar | No | ||
| California's 36th District | Raul Ruiz | No | ||
| California's 52nd District | Scott Peters | No | ||
| Florida's 2nd District | Gwen Graham | No | ||
| Florida's 18th District | Patrick Murphy | Yes | ||
| Illinois' 17th District | Cheri Bustos | No | ||
| Minnesota's 8th District | Rick Nolan | No | ||
| Nebraska's 2nd District | Brad Ashford | No | ||
| New Hampshire's 2nd District | Ann McLane Kuster | No | ||
| New York's 18th District | Sean Maloney | No | ||
Red to Blue
On February 11, 2016, the DCCC released the first 31 members of its Red to Blue program. The program "highlights top Democratic campaigns across the country, and offers them financial, communications, grassroots, and strategic support."[32] Chairman Ben Ray Lujan said of the program:
| “ | House Democrats are on offense and will pick up seats in 2016, and these effective, hardworking and diverse candidates are the foundation of our success this year. Not only have these individuals proven themselves ready to win by building smart campaigns and through strong fundraising, they have also proven themselves ready to fight on behalf of all the people in their districts, keep them safe and ensure the economy works for everyone. | ” |
| —Ben Ray Lujan, http://dccc.org/dccc-chairman-lujan-announces-first-31-districts-red-blue-program/ | ||
| Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee Red to Blue 2016 | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| District | Candidate | Open seat? | ||
| California's 24th District | Salud Carbajal | Yes | ||
| Colorado's 6th District | Morgan Carroll | No | ||
| Florida's 10th District | Val Demings | No | ||
| Florida's 13th District | Multiple candidates | Yes | ||
| Florida's 18th District | Randy Perkins | Yes | ||
| Florida's 26th District | Annette Taddeo | No | ||
| Iowa's 1st District | Monica Vernon | No | ||
| Illinois' 10th District | Brad Schneider | No | ||
| Maine's 2nd District | Emily Cain | No | ||
| Michigan's 1st District | Lon Johnson | Yes | ||
| Michigan's 7th District | Gretchen Driskell | No | ||
| Minnesota's 2nd District | Angie Craig | Yes | ||
| New Jersey's 5th District | Josh Gottheimer | No | ||
| New York's 1st District | Multiple candidates | No | ||
| New York's 24th District | Multiple candidates | No | ||
| Nevada's 3rd District | Jacky Rosen | Yes | ||
| Nevada's 4th District | Multiple candidates | No | ||
| Pennsylvania's 8th District | Multiple candidates | Yes | ||
| Texas' 23rd District | Pete Gallego | No | ||
| Utah's 4th District | Doug Owens | No | ||
| Virginia's 10th District | LuAnn Bennett | No | ||
Emerging Races is the second tier of the Red to Blue program. According to the DCCC, it includes the districts "where campaigns are on track and working hard to put seats in play."[32]
| Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee Emerging Races 2016 | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| District | Candidate | Open seat? | ||
| Arizona's 1st District | Tom O'Halleran | Yes | ||
| California's 10th District | Michael Eggman | No | ||
| California's 25th District | Bryan Caforio | No | ||
| Colorado's 3rd District | Gail Schwartz | No | ||
| Iowa's 3rd District | Multiple candidates | No | ||
| Michigan's 8th District | Melissa Gilbert | No | ||
| Montana's At-Large District | Denise Juneau | No | ||
| New Hampshire's 1st District | Carol Shea-Porter | No | ||
| New York's 19th District | Multiple candidates | Yes | ||
| New York's 21st District | Mike Derrick | No | ||
| New York's 22nd District | Kim Myers | Yes | ||
| New York's 23rd District | John Plumb | No | ||
| Pennsylvania's 7th District | Bill Golderer | No | ||
| Virginia's 4th District | Donald McEachin | Yes | ||
| West Virginia's 2nd District | Cory Simpson | No | ||
| Wisconsin's 8th District | Tom Nelson | Yes | ||
Campaign finance
DCCC and NRCC
The NRCC and the DCCC are the two principal political groups that raise funds to elect congressional candidates. The monthly fundraising figures for each committee will be displayed in the table below as they become available.
| DCCC and NRCC monthly fundraising | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee | National Republican Congressional Committee | |||||||
| Report | Receipts | Expenditures | Cash on hand | Debt | Receipts | Expenditures | Cash on hand | Debt |
| August 2016 | $11,986,005 | $7,313,148 | $61,948,402 | $0 | $4,559,861 | $3,811,379 | $64,045,614 | $0 |
| July 2016 | $12,082,519 | $6,001,526 | $57,275,546 | $0 | $9,344,238 | $2,879,015 | $63,297,132 | $0 |
| June 2016 | $8,080,123 | $5,012,480 | $51,194,552 | $0 | $6,156,967 | $2,360,778 | $56,831,909 | $0 |
| May 2016 | $8,585,572 | $4,574,142 | $48,126,909 | $0 | $5,354,797 | $2,308,889 | $53,035,719 | $0 |
| April 2016 | $11,321,340 | $4,241,723 | $44,115,479 | $0 | $13,965,932 | $3,016,854 | $49,989,811 | $0 |
| March 2016 | $7,149,636 | $3,287,942 | $37,035,862 | $0 | $6,333,745 | $1,948,367 | $39,040,733 | $0 |
| February 2016 | $6,431,034 | $2,578,738 | $33,174,169 | $0 | $6,483,827 | $1,938,307 | $34,655,355 | $0 |
| Year-End | $6,701,116 | $3,557,846 | $29,321,872 | $0 | $8,646,968 | $2,222,889 | $30,109,835 | $0 |
| December 2015 | $4,564,220 | $2,807,311 | $26,178,602 | $0 | $2,689,708 | $1,942,546 | $23,685,756 | $0 |
| November 2015 | $5,399,657 | $2,739,869 | $24,421,693 | $0 | $5,058,306 | $1,957,888 | $22,938,594 | $0 |
| October 2015 | $6,622,268 | $2,560,458 | $21,761,905 | $0 | $3,325,054 | $1,785,457 | $19,838,176 | $0 |
| September 2015 | $4,154,282 | $2,608,496 | $17,700,095 | $0 | $2,925,212 | $1,907,428 | $18,298,579 | $0 |
| August 2015 | $4,392,802 | $2,669,171 | $16,154,309 | $0 | $3,699,315 | $1,821,067 | $17,280,795 | $0 |
| July 2015 | $6,905,366 | $2,591,313 | $14,430,678 | $0 | $7,263,127 | $2,525,676 | $15,402,546 | $0 |
| June 2015 | $4,417,024 | $2,487,277 | $10,116,625 | $0 | $3,746,619 | $2,302,242 | $10,665,096 | $0 |
| May 2015 | $5,363,859 | $6,455,002 | $8,186,878 | $0 | $5,089,342 | $2,805,149 | $9,220,720 | $0 |
| April 2015 | $8,182,885 | $5,260,418 | $9,278,020 | $4,000,000 | $17,310,849 | $16,708,324 | $6,936,526 | $0 |
| March 2015 | $5,157,461 | $5,653,299 | $6,355,553 | $6,500,000 | $5,047,436 | $2,327,080 | $6,334,001 | $7,000,000 |
| February 2015 | $6,376,209 | $1,674,255 | $6,851,392 | $10,000,000 | $4,448,611 | $2,312,236 | $3,613,645 | $7,500,000 |
Prior elections
| DCCC and NRCC yearly fundraising | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee | National Republican Congressional Committee | |||||||
| Year | Total Receipts | Total Expenditures | Total Receipts | Total Expenditures | ||||
| 2014 | $206,791,979 | $206,130,764 | $153,488,110 | $153,545,450 | ||||
| 2012 | $183,843,028 | $183,160,429 | $155,724,601 | $156,728,295 | ||||
| 2010 | $163,896,040 | $163,582,271 | $133,779,108 | $132,098,654 | ||||
| 2008 | $176,204,612 | $176,518,249 | $118,324,756 | $118,226,373 | ||||
| 2006 | $139,994,367 | $140,876,916 | $176,300,627 | $178,063,132 | ||||
Race ratings
The following table compares Ballotpedia's most recent battleground ratings with current race ratings from The Cook Political Report, Sabato's Crystal Ball and The Rothenberg and Gonzales Political Report.
| U.S. House race ratings comparison | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| District | Ballotpedia | Cook[33] | Sabato[34] | Rothenberg[35] |
| Alaska's At-Large | Safe R | Likely R | Likely R | Safe R |
| Arizona's 1st | Battleground | Toss-up | Lean D | Pure Toss-up |
| Arizona's 2nd | Battleground | Lean R | Lean R | R Favored |
| Arizona's 9th | Safe D | Likely D | Safe D | Safe D |
| California's 7th | Battleground | Lean D | Lean D | Lean D |
| California's 10th | Competitive R | Lean R | Likely R | Safe R |
| California's 21st | Safe R | Lean R | Likely R | R Favored |
| California's 24th | Safe D | Likely D | Likely D | Safe D |
| California's 25th | Battleground | Toss-up | Lean R | R Favored |
| California's 31st | Safe D | Safe D | Likely D | Safe D |
| California's 36th | Safe D | Safe D | Likely D | Safe D |
| California's 49th | Safe R | Likely R | Likely R | Safe R |
| California's 52nd | Safe D | Likely D | Likely D | Safe D |
| Colorado's 3rd | Safe R | Lean R | Likely R | Safe R |
| Colorado's 6th | Battleground | Toss-up | Toss-up | Toss-up/Tilt R |
| Florida's 2nd[36] | Safe R | Likely R | Safe R | Safe R |
| Florida's 7th | Safe R | Lean R | Likely R | R Favored |
| Florida's 10th[36] | Safe D | Likely D | Safe D | Safe D |
| Florida's 13th | Safe D | Lean D | Lean D | D Favored |
| Florida's 18th | Battleground | Toss-up | Toss-up | Pure Toss-up |
| Florida's 26th | Battleground | Toss-up | Toss-up | Pure Toss-up |
| Florida's 27th | Safe R | Likely R | Safe R | Safe R |
| Illinois' 10th | Battleground | Toss-up | Toss-up | Pure Toss-up |
| Illinois' 12th | Safe R | Likely R | Likely R | Safe R |
| Indiana's 9th | Safe R | Likely R | Likely R | R Favored |
| Iowa's 1st | Battleground | Lean D | Lean D | Toss-up/Tilt D |
| Iowa's 3rd | Battleground | Toss-up | Toss-up | Pure Toss-up |
| Kansas' 3rd | Safe R | Safe R | Likely R | Safe R |
| Maine's 2nd | Battleground | Toss-up | Toss-up | Pure Toss-up |
| Maryland's 6th | Safe D | Likely D | Likely D | Safe D |
| Michigan's 1st | Battleground | Lean R | Toss-up | Lean R |
| Michigan's 7th | Competitive R | Lean R | Lean R | Toss-up/Tilt R |
| Michigan's 11th | Safe R | Likely R | Safe R | Safe R |
| Minnesota's 2nd | Battleground | Lean D | Lean D | Toss-up/Tilt D |
| Minnesota's 3rd | Safe R | Lean R | Lean R | R Favored |
| Minnesota's 8th | Competitive D | Lean D | Lean D | D Favored |
| Montana's At-Large | Safe R | Likely R | Likely R | Safe R |
| Nebraska's 2nd | Battleground | Lean D | Lean D | Toss-up/Tilt D |
| Nevada's 3rd | Battleground | Toss-up | Lean D | Pure Toss-up |
| Nevada's 4th | Battleground | Lean D | Lean D | Toss-up/Tilt D |
| New Hampshire's 1st | Battleground | Toss-up | Lean D | Toss-up/Tilt D |
| New Jersey's 5th | Competitive R | Lean R | Lean R | R Favored |
| New York's 1st | Battleground | Toss-up | Toss-up | Toss-up/Tilt R |
| New York's 3rd | Battleground | Toss-up | Toss-up | Toss-up/Tilt D |
| New York's 18th | Safe D | Safe D | Likely D | Safe D |
| New York's 19th | Battleground | Toss-up | Toss-up | Lean R |
| New York's 21st | Competitive R | Likely R | Likely R | Safe R |
| New York's 22nd | Battleground | Toss-up | Toss-up | Pure Toss-up |
| New York's 23rd | Safe R | Lean R | Likely R | Safe R |
| New York's 24th | Battleground | Toss-up | Toss-up | Pure Toss-up |
| New York's 25th | Safe D | Safe D | Safe D | Safe D |
| Pennsylvania's 6th | Safe R | Likely R | Safe R | Safe R |
| Pennsylvania's 8th | Battleground | Toss-up | Toss-up | Toss-up/Tilt R |
| Pennsylvania's 16th | Safe R | Likely R | Likely R | Safe R |
| Texas' 23rd | Battleground | Toss-up | Toss-up | Pure Toss-up |
| Utah's 4th | Competitive R | Toss-up | Toss-up | R Favored |
| Virginia's 2nd | Safe R | Safe R | Likely R | Safe R |
| Virginia's 4th[36] | Safe D | Likely D | Safe D | Safe D |
| Virginia's 5th | Safe R | Likely R | Likely R | Safe R |
| Virginia's 10th | Competitive R | Lean R | Lean R | Lean R |
| Washington's 8th | Safe R | Likely R | Safe R | Safe R |
| Wisconsin's 8th | Battleground | Toss-up | Toss-up | Pure Toss-up |
2016 congressional filing deadlines by state
The table below lists congressional primary dates and filing deadlines for each state.[37]
| Primary dates and filing deadlines, 2016 | ||
|---|---|---|
| State | Filing deadline for primary candidates | Primary election |
| Alabama | 11/6/2015 | 3/1/2016 |
| Alaska | 6/1/2016 | 8/16/2016 |
| Arizona | 6/1/2016 | 8/30/2016 |
| Arkansas | 11/9/2015 | 3/1/2016 |
| California | 3/11/2016 | 6/7/2016 |
| Colorado | 4/4/2016 | 6/28/2016 |
| Connecticut | 6/7/2016 | 8/9/2016 |
| Delaware | 7/12/2016 | 9/13/2016 |
| District of Columbia | 3/16/2016 | 6/14/2016 |
| Florida | 6/24/2016 | 8/30/2016 |
| Georgia | 3/11/2016 | 5/24/2016 |
| Hawaii | 6/7/2016 | 8/13/2016 |
| Idaho | 3/11/2016 | 5/17/2016 |
| Illinois | 11/30/2015 | 3/15/2016 |
| Indiana | 2/5/2016 | 5/3/2016 |
| Iowa | 3/18/2016 | 6/7/2016 |
| Kansas | 6/1/2016 | 8/2/2016 |
| Kentucky | 1/26/2016 | 5/17/2016 |
| Louisiana | 7/22/2016 | 11/8/2016 |
| Maine | 3/15/2016 | 6/14/2016 |
| Maryland | 2/3/2016 | 4/26/2016 |
| Massachusetts | 6/7/2016 | 9/20/2016 |
| Michigan | 4/19/2016 | 8/2/2016 |
| Minnesota | 5/31/2016 | 8/9/2016 |
| Mississippi | 1/8/2016 | 3/8/2016 |
| Missouri | 3/29/2016 | 8/2/2016 |
| Montana | 3/14/2016 | 6/7/2016 |
| Nebraska | 2/16/2016 (incumbents); 3/1/2016 (non-incumbents) | 5/10/2016 |
| Nevada | 3/18/2016 | 6/14/2016 |
| New Hampshire | 6/10/2016 | 9/13/2016 |
| New Jersey | 4/4/2016 | 6/7/2016 |
| New Mexico | 2/2/2016 | 6/7/2016 |
| New York | 4/14/2016 (major parties); 4/21/2016 (write-in); 8/2/2016 (independents); 9/9/2016 (other parties) | 6/28/2016 |
| North Carolina | 2/29/2016 | 3/15/2016 (all non-U.S. House races); 6/7/2016 (U.S. House) |
| North Dakota | 4/11/2016 | 6/14/2016 |
| Ohio | 12/16/2015 | 3/15/2016 |
| Oklahoma | 4/15/2016 | 6/28/2016 |
| Oregon | 3/8/2016 | 5/17/2016 |
| Pennsylvania | 2/16/2016 | 4/26/2016 |
| Rhode Island | 6/29/2016 | 9/13/2016 |
| South Carolina | 3/30/2016 | 6/14/2016 |
| South Dakota | 3/29/2016 | 6/7/2016 |
| Tennessee | 4/7/2016 | 8/4/2016 |
| Texas | 12/14/2015 | 3/1/2016 |
| Utah | 3/17/2016 | 6/28/2016 |
| Vermont | 5/26/2016 | 8/9/2016 |
| Virginia | 3/31/2016 | 6/14/2016 |
| Washington | 5/20/2016 | 8/2/2016 |
| West Virginia | 1/30/2016 | 5/10/2016 |
| Wisconsin | 6/1/2016 | 8/9/2016 |
| Wyoming | 5/27/2016 | 8/16/2016 |
Recent news
This section displays the most recent stories in a Google news search for the term 2016 + house + elections
2016 House Elections News Feed
- Some of the stories below may not be relevant to this page due to the nature of Google's news search engine. Read about Ballotpedia's inclusion of these search results here.
- Loading...
See also
- United States Congress elections, 2016
- United States Senate elections, 2016
- Presidential election, 2016
- United States House of Representatives
Footnotes
- ↑ Roll Call, "Can Democrats Win the House in 2016?" January 13, 2015
- ↑ Sabato's Crystal Ball, "House 2016: Gridlock Ahead for a Possible Clinton Administration?" May 28, 2015
- ↑ 3.0 3.1 3.2 United States House of Representatives, "Party Divisions of the House of Representatives," accessed September 8, 2015
- ↑ The New York Times, "John Boehner, House Speaker, Will Resign From Congress," September 25, 2015
- ↑ CNN, "Michael Grimm announces resignation," accessed January 5, 2015
- ↑ USA Today, "Rep. Alan Nunnelee dies at 56," February 6, 2015
- ↑ Philly.com, "Special election for Fattah's former U.S. House seat will be Nov. 8," July 1, 2016
- ↑ Hawaii News Now, "State to hold special election for remainder of Takai's term," July 20, 2016
- ↑ 6abc.com, "Rep. Chaka Fattah indicted in racketeering case," July 29, 2015
- ↑ The Hill, "Rep. Chaka Fattah found guilty on corruption charges," June 21, 2016
- ↑ Politico, "Fattah submits resignation but wants to stay until October," June 22, 2016
- ↑ ABC 6, "Rep. Chaka Fattah resigns effective immediately," June 23, 2016
- ↑ Roll Call, "The Unprecedented Action of One Anti-Abortion Group," May 11, 2016
- ↑ Politico, "Koch-backed group targets first GOP incumbent in primary," May 12, 2016
- ↑ The New York Times, "Donald Trump Makes His First Congressional Endorsement," June 6, 2016
- ↑ Politico, "Koch-backed group targets first GOP incumbent in primary," May 12, 2016
- ↑ The New York Times, "North Carolina Primary Results," June 7, 2016
- ↑ The New York Times, "Virginia Primary Results," June 14, 2016
- ↑ Politico, "GOP Rep. Scott Rigell retiring," January 14, 2016
- ↑ National Review, " What’s Going On in Kansas’s Big First?" August 2, 2016
- ↑ Politico, "Kansas House Primaries Results," August 2, 2016
- ↑ United States Election Project, "Voter Turnout," accessed September 6, 2015
- ↑ 23.0 23.1 23.2 23.3 23.4 NRCC "About," accessed September 8, 2015
- ↑ 24.0 24.1 24.2 24.3 24.4 Note: This text is quoted verbatim from the original source. Any inconsistencies are attributed to the original source.
- ↑ Roll Call, "Exclusive: NRCC Announces 12 Members in Patriot Program," February 13, 2015
- ↑ NRCC, "32 Congressional Candidates Announced “On the Radar” as Part of NRCC’s Young Guns Program," November 19, 2015
- ↑ NRCC, "11 Candidates Added to “On the Radar” in NRCC’S Young Guns Program," February 18, 2016
- ↑ The Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee, "About us," accessed January 22, 2015
- ↑ Buzzfeed, "The 2014 Election Began On Election Night For House Democrats," November 27, 2012
- ↑ DCCC, "Frontline Democrats 2015-2016," February 12, 2015
- ↑ Roll Call, "Exclusive: DCCC Announces 14 Incumbents in Frontline Program," February 12, 2015
- ↑ 32.0 32.1 DCCC, "DCCC Chairman Luján Announces First 31 Districts In Red To Blue Program," February 11, 2016
- ↑ The Cook Political Report, "2016 House Race Ratings," accessed August 24, 2016
- ↑ Sabato's Crystal Ball, "2016 House," accessed August 24, 2016
- ↑ The Rothenberg & Gonzales Political Report, "House Ratings," accessed August 24, 2016
- ↑ 36.0 36.1 36.2 Due to court-ordered redistricting, Florida's 2nd and 10th Congressional Districts and Virginia's 4th Congressional District are expected to flip partisan control. However, Ballotpedia predicts that these races will not be competitive.
- ↑ Federal Election Commission, "2016 Preliminary Presidential and Congressional Primary Dates," accessed September 21, 2015
| ||
For information about public policy issues in the 2016 elections, see: Public policy in the 2016 elections!