Everything you need to know about ranked-choice voting in one spot. Click to learn more!

VERA M. ENGLISH v. GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY (1990)

From Ballotpedia
Jump to: navigation, search

Seal of the Supreme Court of the United States
VERA M. ENGLISH v. GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY
Term: 1989
Important Dates
Argued: April 25, 1990
Decided: June 4, 1990
Outcome
Reversed and remanded
Vote
9-0
Majority
Harry BlackmunWilliam BrennanAnthony KennedyThurgood MarshallSandra Day O'ConnorWilliam RehnquistAntonin ScaliaJohn Paul StevensByron White

VERA M. ENGLISH v. GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY is a case that was decided by the Supreme Court of the United States on June 4, 1990. The case was argued before the court on April 25, 1990.

In a 9-0 ruling, the U.S. Supreme Court reversed the ruling of the lower court and remanded the case for further proceedings consistent with the Court's opinion. The case originated from the North Carolina Eastern U.S. District Court.

For a full list of cases decided in the 1980s, click here. For a full list of cases decided by the Rehnquist Court, click here.

[1]

About the case

  • Subject matter: Federalism - federal pre-emption of state legislation or regulation. cf. state regulation of business. rarely involves union activity. Does not involve constitutional interpretation unless the Court says it does.
  • Petitioner: Female employee or job applicant
  • Petitioner state: Unknown
  • Respondent type: employer. If employer's relations with employees are governed by the nature of the employer's business (e.g., railroad, boat), rather than labor law generally, the more specific designation is used in place of Employer.
  • Respondent state: Unknown
  • Citation: 496 U.S. 72
  • How the court took jurisdiction: Cert
  • What type of decision was made: Opinion of the court (orally argued)
  • Who was the chief justice: William Rehnquist
  • Who wrote the majority opinion: Harry Blackmun

These data points were accessed from The Supreme Court Database, which also attempts to categorize the ideological direction of the court's ruling in each case. This case's ruling was categorized as conservative.

See also

External links

Footnotes