VERNONIA SCHOOL DISTRICT 47J v. WAYNE ACTON, ET UX., ETC. (1995)
- Justices
- CASES BY TERM
- Supreme Court cases, October term 2025-2026
- Supreme Court cases, October term 2024-2025
- Supreme Court cases, October term 2023-2024
- Supreme Court cases, October term 2022-2023
- Supreme Court cases, October term 2021-2022
- Supreme Court cases, October term 2020-2021
- Supreme Court cases, October term 2019-2020
- Supreme Court cases, October term 2018-2019
- Supreme Court cases, October term 2017-2018
- Supreme Court cases, October term 2016-2017
- Supreme Court cases, October term 2015-2016
- All earlier cases
- HISTORY OF THE COURT
- Recent vacancies
 |
| VERNONIA SCHOOL DISTRICT 47J v. WAYNE ACTON, ET UX., ETC. |
|---|
| Term: 1994 |
| Important Dates |
| Argued: March 28, 1995 |
| Decided: June 26, 1995 |
| Outcome |
| Vacated and remanded |
| Vote |
| 6-3 |
| Majority |
| Stephen Breyer • Anthony Kennedy • William Rehnquist • Antonin Scalia • Clarence Thomas |
| Concurring |
| Ruth Bader Ginsburg |
| Dissenting |
| Sandra Day O'Connor • David Souter • John Paul Stevens |
VERNONIA SCHOOL DISTRICT 47J v. WAYNE ACTON, ET UX., ETC. is a case that was decided by the Supreme Court of the United States on June 26, 1995. The case was argued before the court on March 28, 1995.
In a 6-3 ruling, the U.S. Supreme Court vacated the ruling of the lower court and remanded the case for further proceedings consistent with the Court's opinion. The case originated from the Oregon U.S. District Court.
For a full list of cases decided in the 1990s, click here. For a full list of cases decided by the Rehnquist Court, click here.
About the case
- Subject matter: Privacy - Privacy (cf. libel, comity: privacy)
- Petitioner: Local school district or board of education
- Petitioner state: Oregon
- Respondent type: Student, or applicant for admission to an educational institution
- Respondent state: Unknown
- Citation: 515 U.S. 646
- How the court took jurisdiction: Cert
- What type of decision was made: Opinion of the court (orally argued)
- Who was the chief justice: William Rehnquist
- Who wrote the majority opinion: Antonin Scalia
These data points were accessed from The Supreme Court Database, which also attempts to categorize the ideological direction of the court's ruling in each case. This case's ruling was categorized as conservative.
See also
- United States Supreme Court cases and courts
- Supreme Court of the United States
- History of the Supreme Court
- United States federal courts
- Ballotpedia's Robe & Gavel newsletter
External links
Footnotes
