VIRGINIA v. KEVIN LAMONT HICKS (2003)

![]() |
VIRGINIA v. KEVIN LAMONT HICKS |
---|
Term: 2002 |
Important Dates |
Argued: April 30, 2003 |
Decided: June 16, 2003 |
Outcome |
Reversed and remanded |
Vote |
9-0 |
Majority |
Ruth Bader Ginsburg • Anthony Kennedy • Sandra Day O'Connor • William Rehnquist • Antonin Scalia • John Paul Stevens • Clarence Thomas |
Concurring |
Stephen Breyer • David Souter |
VIRGINIA v. KEVIN LAMONT HICKS is a case that was decided by the Supreme Court of the United States on June 16, 2003. The case was argued before the court on April 30, 2003.
In a 9-0 ruling, the U.S. Supreme Court reversed the ruling of the lower court and remanded the case for further proceedings consistent with the Court's opinion. The case originated from the Virginia State Trial Court.
For a full list of cases decided in the 2000s, click here. For a full list of cases decided by the Rehnquist Court, click here.
About the case
- Subject matter: First Amendment - First Amendment, miscellaneous (cf. comity: First Amendment)
- Petitioner: State
- Petitioner state: Virginia
- Respondent type: Person accused, indicted, or suspected of crime
- Respondent state: Unknown
- Citation: 539 U.S. 113
- How the court took jurisdiction: Cert
- What type of decision was made: Opinion of the court (orally argued)
- Who was the chief justice: William Rehnquist
- Who wrote the majority opinion: Antonin Scalia
These data points were accessed from The Supreme Court Database, which also attempts to categorize the ideological direction of the court's ruling in each case. This case's ruling was categorized as conservative.
See also
- United States Supreme Court cases and courts
- Supreme Court of the United States
- History of the Supreme Court
- United States federal courts
- Ballotpedia's Robe & Gavel newsletter
External links
Footnotes