Your monthly support provides voters the knowledge they need to make confident decisions at the polls. Donate today.

VOLKSWAGENWERK AKTIENGESELLSCHAFT v. FEDERAL MARITIME COMMISSION et al. (1968)

From Ballotpedia
Jump to: navigation, search

Seal of the Supreme Court of the United States
VOLKSWAGENWERK AKTIENGESELLSCHAFT v. FEDERAL MARITIME COMMISSION et al.
Term: 1967
Important Dates
Argued: November 13, 1967
Decided: March 6, 1968
Outcome
Reversed and remanded
Vote
7-1
Majority
Hugo BlackWilliam BrennanPotter StewartEarl WarrenByron White
Concurring
Abe FortasJohn Harlan II
Dissenting
William Douglas

VOLKSWAGENWERK AKTIENGESELLSCHAFT v. FEDERAL MARITIME COMMISSION et al. is a case that was decided by the Supreme Court of the United States on March 6, 1968. The case was argued before the court on November 13, 1967.

In a 7-1 ruling, the U.S. Supreme Court reversed the ruling of the lower court and remanded the case for further proceedings consistent with the Court's opinion. The case originated from the U.S. Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit (includes the Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia but not the District of Columbia Court of Appeals, which has local jurisdiction).

For a full list of cases decided in the 1960s, click here. For a full list of cases decided by the Warren Court, click here.

[1]

About the case

  • Subject matter: Economic Activity - Federal and some few state regulations of transportation regulation: boat
  • Petitioner: Shipper, including importer and exporter
  • Petitioner state: Unknown
  • Respondent type: Federal Maritime Commission
  • Respondent state: Unknown
  • Citation: 390 U.S. 261
  • How the court took jurisdiction: Cert
  • What type of decision was made: Opinion of the court (orally argued)
  • Who was the chief justice: Earl Warren
  • Who wrote the majority opinion: Potter Stewart

These data points were accessed from The Supreme Court Database, which also attempts to categorize the ideological direction of the court's ruling in each case. This case's ruling was categorized as conservative.

See also

External links

Footnotes