Voigt deference

From Ballotpedia
Jump to: navigation, search
New Administrative State Banner.png
What is deference in the context of the administrative state?

Deference, or judicial deference, is a principle of judicial review in which a federal court yields to an agency's interpretation of a statute or regulation. The U.S. Supreme Court has developed several forms of deference in reviewing federal agency actions, including Chevron deference, Skidmore deference, and Auer deference. Learn about state-level responses to deference here.


Five Pillars of the Administrative State
Administrative State Icon Gold.png

Judicial deference
Read more about the administrative state on Ballotpedia.

Voigt deference is an administrative law principle that directs federal courts to defer to state agency interpretations of ambiguous federal regulations. A divided United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit developed Voigt deference in the court's November 2020 decision in Voigt v. Coyote Creek Mining Company.[1]

Other types of deference

See also: Deference in the context of the administrative state

Below is a list of various deference regimes cited by the U.S. Supreme Court in agency interpretation cases:[2]

  • No deference: ad hoc judicial reasoning
  • Anti-deference: the court invokes a presumption against the agency interpretation in criminal cases (the rule of lenity) and in some cases in which the agency interpretation raises serious constitutional concerns (the canon of constitutional avoidance)
  • Consultative deference: the court, without invoking a named deference regime, relies on some input from the agency (e.g. amicus briefs, interpretive rules or guidance, or manuals) and uses that input to guide its reasoning and decisionmaking process
  • Skidmore deference: agency interpretation is entitled to "respect proportional to its power to persuade," with such power determined by the interpretation's "thoroughness, logic and expertness"; its "fit with prior interpretations"; etc.
  • Beth Israel deference: pre-Chevron test permitting reasonable interpretations that are consistent with the statute
  • Chevron deference: reasonable agency interpretations of ambiguous statutes accepted. If the statute is clear, no deference to agency
  • Curtiss-Wright: super-strong deference to executive interpretations involving foreign affairs and national security

See also

External links