Your monthly support provides voters the knowledge they need to make confident decisions at the polls. Donate today.

WALTER MICKENS, JR. v. JOHN TAYLOR, WARDEN (2002)

From Ballotpedia
Jump to: navigation, search

Seal of the Supreme Court of the United States
WALTER MICKENS, JR. v. JOHN TAYLOR, WARDEN
Term: 2001
Important Dates
Argued: November 5, 2001
Decided: March 27, 2002
Outcome
Affirmed (includes modified)
Vote
5-4
Majority
William RehnquistAntonin ScaliaClarence Thomas
Concurring
Anthony KennedySandra Day O'Connor
Dissenting
Stephen BreyerRuth Bader GinsburgDavid SouterJohn Paul Stevens

WALTER MICKENS, JR. v. JOHN TAYLOR, WARDEN is a case that was decided by the Supreme Court of the United States on March 27, 2002. The case was argued before the court on November 5, 2001.

In a 5-4 ruling, the U.S. Supreme Court affirmed the ruling of the lower court. The case originated from the Virginia Eastern U.S. District Court.

For a full list of cases decided in the 2000s, click here. For a full list of cases decided by the Rehnquist Court, click here.

[1]

About the case

  • Subject matter: Criminal Procedure - Right to counsel (cf. indigents appointment of counsel or inadequate representation)
  • Petitioner: Person convicted of crime
  • Petitioner state: Unknown
  • Respondent type: State
  • Respondent state: Virginia
  • Citation: 535 U.S. 162
  • How the court took jurisdiction: Cert
  • What type of decision was made: Opinion of the court (orally argued)
  • Who was the chief justice: William Rehnquist
  • Who wrote the majority opinion: Antonin Scalia

These data points were accessed from The Supreme Court Database, which also attempts to categorize the ideological direction of the court's ruling in each case. This case's ruling was categorized as conservative.

See also

External links

Footnotes