Help us improve in just 2 minutes—share your thoughts in our reader survey.

WASHINGTON-SOUTHERN NAVIGATION COMPANY v. BALTIMORE & PHILADELPHIA STEAMBOAT COMPANY (1924)

From Ballotpedia
Jump to: navigation, search

Seal of the Supreme Court of the United States
WASHINGTON-SOUTHERN NAVIGATION COMPANY v. BALTIMORE & PHILADELPHIA STEAMBOAT COMPANY
Term: 1923
Important Dates
Argued: November 27, 1923
Decided: January 28, 1924
Outcome
Certification to or from a lower court
Vote
9-0
Majority
Louis Dembitz BrandeisPierce ButlerOliver Wendell HolmesJoseph McKennaJames Clark McReynoldsEdward Terry SanfordGeorge SutherlandWilliam Howard TaftWillis Van Devanter

WASHINGTON-SOUTHERN NAVIGATION COMPANY v. BALTIMORE & PHILADELPHIA STEAMBOAT COMPANY is a case that was decided by the Supreme Court of the United States on January 28, 1924. The case was argued before the court on November 27, 1923.

The U.S. Supreme Court examined the lower court's certified question. The case originated from the Pennsylvania Eastern U.S. District Court.

For a full list of cases decided in the 1920s, click here. For a full list of cases decided by the Taft Court, click here.

[1]

About the case

  • Subject matter: Judicial Power - Federal Rules of Civil Procedure including Supreme Court Rules, application of the Federal Rules of Evidence, Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure in civil litigation, Circuit Court Rules, and state rules and admiralty rules
  • Petitioner: Injured person or legal entity, nonphysically and non-employment related
  • Petitioner state: Unknown
  • Respondent type: Water transportation, stevedore
  • Respondent state: Unknown
  • Citation: 263 U.S. 629
  • How the court took jurisdiction: Certification
  • What type of decision was made: Opinion of the court (orally argued)
  • Who was the chief justice: William Howard Taft
  • Who wrote the majority opinion: Louis Dembitz Brandeis

These data points were accessed from The Supreme Court Database, which also attempts to categorize the ideological direction of the court's ruling in each case. This case's ruling was categorized as liberal.

See also

External links

Footnotes