Your feedback ensures we stay focused on the facts that matter to you most—take our survey

WASHINGTON v. ARTURO R. RECUENCO (2006)

From Ballotpedia
Jump to: navigation, search

Seal of the Supreme Court of the United States
WASHINGTON v. ARTURO R. RECUENCO
Term: 2005
Important Dates
Argued: April 17, 2006
Decided: June 26, 2006
Outcome
Reversed and remanded
Vote
7-2
Majority
Samuel AlitoStephen BreyerJohn RobertsAntonin ScaliaDavid SouterClarence Thomas
Concurring
Anthony Kennedy
Dissenting
Ruth Bader GinsburgJohn Paul Stevens

WASHINGTON v. ARTURO R. RECUENCO is a case that was decided by the Supreme Court of the United States on June 26, 2006. The case was argued before the court on April 17, 2006.

In a 7-2 ruling, the U.S. Supreme Court reversed the ruling of the lower court and remanded the case for further proceedings consistent with the Court's opinion. The case originated from the Washington State Trial Court.

For a full list of cases decided in the 2000s, click here. For a full list of cases decided by the Roberts Court, click here.

[1]

About the case

  • Subject matter: Criminal Procedure - statutory construction of criminal laws: sentencing guidelines
  • Petitioner: State
  • Petitioner state: Washington
  • Respondent type: Defendant
  • Respondent state: Unknown
  • Citation: 548 U.S. 212
  • How the court took jurisdiction: Cert
  • What type of decision was made: Opinion of the court (orally argued)
  • Who was the chief justice: John Roberts
  • Who wrote the majority opinion: Clarence Thomas

These data points were accessed from The Supreme Court Database, which also attempts to categorize the ideological direction of the court's ruling in each case. This case's ruling was categorized as conservative.

See also

External links

Footnotes