Your feedback ensures we stay focused on the facts that matter to you most—take our survey
WASHINGTON v. ARTURO R. RECUENCO (2006)

![]() |
WASHINGTON v. ARTURO R. RECUENCO |
---|
Term: 2005 |
Important Dates |
Argued: April 17, 2006 |
Decided: June 26, 2006 |
Outcome |
Reversed and remanded |
Vote |
7-2 |
Majority |
Samuel Alito • Stephen Breyer • John Roberts • Antonin Scalia • David Souter • Clarence Thomas |
Concurring |
Anthony Kennedy |
Dissenting |
Ruth Bader Ginsburg • John Paul Stevens |
WASHINGTON v. ARTURO R. RECUENCO is a case that was decided by the Supreme Court of the United States on June 26, 2006. The case was argued before the court on April 17, 2006.
In a 7-2 ruling, the U.S. Supreme Court reversed the ruling of the lower court and remanded the case for further proceedings consistent with the Court's opinion. The case originated from the Washington State Trial Court.
For a full list of cases decided in the 2000s, click here. For a full list of cases decided by the Roberts Court, click here.
About the case
- Subject matter: Criminal Procedure - statutory construction of criminal laws: sentencing guidelines
- Petitioner: State
- Petitioner state: Washington
- Respondent type: Defendant
- Respondent state: Unknown
- Citation: 548 U.S. 212
- How the court took jurisdiction: Cert
- What type of decision was made: Opinion of the court (orally argued)
- Who was the chief justice: John Roberts
- Who wrote the majority opinion: Clarence Thomas
These data points were accessed from The Supreme Court Database, which also attempts to categorize the ideological direction of the court's ruling in each case. This case's ruling was categorized as conservative.
See also
- United States Supreme Court cases and courts
- Supreme Court of the United States
- History of the Supreme Court
- United States federal courts
- Ballotpedia's Robe & Gavel newsletter
External links
Footnotes