Your monthly support provides voters the knowledge they need to make confident decisions at the polls. Donate today.

WILLIAM FENN, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR, v. PETER H. HOLME (1859)

From Ballotpedia
Jump to: navigation, search

Seal of the Supreme Court of the United States
WILLIAM FENN, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR, v. PETER H. HOLME
Term: 1858
Important Dates
Argued: February 16, 1859
Decided: March 11, 1859
Outcome
Reversed
Vote
9-0
Majority
John Archibald CampbellJohn CatronNathan CliffordPeter Vivian DanielRobert Cooper GrierJohn McLeanSamuel NelsonRoger Brooke TaneyJames Moore Wayne

WILLIAM FENN, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR, v. PETER H. HOLME is a case that was decided by the Supreme Court of the United States on March 11, 1859. The case was argued before the court on February 16, 1859.

In a 9-0 ruling, the U.S. Supreme Court reversed the ruling of the lower court. The case originated from the Missouri U.S. Circuit for (all) District(s) of Missouri.

For a full list of cases decided in the 1850s, click here. For a full list of cases decided by the Taney Court, click here.

[1]

About the case

  • Subject matter: Economic Activity - state and territorial land claims
  • Petitioner: Owner, landlord, or claimant to ownership, fee interest, or possession of land as well as chattels
  • Petitioner state: Unknown
  • Respondent type: Owner, landlord, or claimant to ownership, fee interest, or possession of land as well as chattels
  • Respondent state: Unknown
  • Citation: 62 U.S. 481
  • How the court took jurisdiction: Writ of error
  • What type of decision was made: Opinion of the court (orally argued)
  • Who was the chief justice: Roger Brooke Taney
  • Who wrote the majority opinion: Peter Vivian Daniel

These data points were accessed from The Supreme Court Database, which also attempts to categorize the ideological direction of the court's ruling in each case. This case's ruling was categorized as unspecifiable.

See also

External links

Footnotes