Your monthly support provides voters the knowledge they need to make confident decisions at the polls. Donate today.

WILLIAM M. FISHBACK v. THE PACIFIC EXPRESS COMPANY (1896)

From Ballotpedia
Jump to: navigation, search

Seal of the Supreme Court of the United States
WILLIAM M. FISHBACK v. THE PACIFIC EXPRESS COMPANY
Term: 1895
Important Dates
Argued: January 23, 1896
Decided: March 2, 1896
Outcome
Reversed and remanded
Vote
9-0
Majority
David Josiah BrewerHenry Billings BrownStephen Johnson FieldMelville Weston FullerHorace GrayJohn Marshall HarlanRufus Wheeler PeckhamGeorge ShirasEdward Douglass White

WILLIAM M. FISHBACK v. THE PACIFIC EXPRESS COMPANY is a case that was decided by the Supreme Court of the United States on March 2, 1896. The case was argued before the court on January 23, 1896.

In a 9-0 ruling, the U.S. Supreme Court reversed the ruling of the lower court and remanded the case for further proceedings consistent with the Court's opinion. The case originated from the Arkansas U.S. Circuit Court for (all) District(s) of Arkansas.

For a full list of cases decided in the 1890s, click here. For a full list of cases decided by the Fuller Court, click here.

[1]

About the case

  • Subject matter: Judicial Power - no merits: dismissed or affirmed for want of jurisdiction (cf. judicial administration: Supreme Court jurisdiction or authority on appeal from federal district courts or courts of appeals)
  • Petitioner: State commission, board, committee, or authority
  • Petitioner state: Arkansas
  • Respondent type: Telephone, telecommunications, or telegraph company
  • Respondent state: Unknown
  • Citation: 161 U.S. 101
  • How the court took jurisdiction: Appeal
  • What type of decision was made: Opinion of the court (orally argued)
  • Who was the chief justice: Melville Weston Fuller
  • Who wrote the majority opinion: Melville Weston Fuller

These data points were accessed from The Supreme Court Database, which also attempts to categorize the ideological direction of the court's ruling in each case. This case's ruling was categorized as conservative.

See also

External links

Footnotes