Help us improve in just 2 minutes—share your thoughts in our reader survey.
WILSON et al. v. LOEW'S INCORPORATED et al. (1958)
From Ballotpedia
- Justices
- CASES BY TERM
- Supreme Court cases, October term 2025-2026
- Supreme Court cases, October term 2024-2025
- Supreme Court cases, October term 2023-2024
- Supreme Court cases, October term 2022-2023
- Supreme Court cases, October term 2021-2022
- Supreme Court cases, October term 2020-2021
- Supreme Court cases, October term 2019-2020
- Supreme Court cases, October term 2018-2019
- Supreme Court cases, October term 2017-2018
- Supreme Court cases, October term 2016-2017
- Supreme Court cases, October term 2015-2016
- All earlier cases
- HISTORY OF THE COURT
- Recent vacancies
 |
| WILSON et al. v. LOEW'S INCORPORATED et al. |
|---|
| Term: 1957 |
| Important Dates |
| Argued: January 8, 1958 |
| Decided: March 3, 1958 |
| Outcome |
| Petition denied or appeal dismissed |
| Vote |
| 8-1 |
| Majority |
| Hugo Black • William Brennan • Harold Burton • Tom Clark • Felix Frankfurter • John Harlan II • Earl Warren • Charles Whittaker |
| Dissenting |
| William Douglas |
WILSON et al. v. LOEW'S INCORPORATED et al. is a case that was decided by the Supreme Court of the United States on March 3, 1958. The case was argued before the court on January 8, 1958.
In an 8-1 ruling, the U.S. Supreme Court dismissed the case. The case originated from the California State Trial Court.
For a full list of cases decided in the 1950s, click here. For a full list of cases decided by the Warren Court, click here.
About the case
- Subject matter: Judicial Power - no merits: adequate non-federal grounds for decision
- Petitioner: Professional organization, business, or person
- Petitioner state: Unknown
- Respondent type: Movie, play, pictorial representation, theatrical production, actor, or exhibitor or distributor of
- Respondent state: Unknown
- Citation: 355 U.S. 597
- How the court took jurisdiction: Cert
- What type of decision was made: Per curiam (orally argued)
- Who was the chief justice: Earl Warren
- Who wrote the majority opinion: Unknown
These data points were accessed from The Supreme Court Database, which also attempts to categorize the ideological direction of the court's ruling in each case. This case's ruling was categorized as conservative.
See also
- United States Supreme Court cases and courts
- Supreme Court of the United States
- History of the Supreme Court
- United States federal courts
- Ballotpedia's Robe & Gavel newsletter
External links
Footnotes
