Help us improve in just 2 minutes—share your thoughts in our reader survey.
WINE RAILWAY APPLIANCE CO. v. ENTERPRISE RAILWAY EQUIPMENT CO. (1936)

![]() |
WINE RAILWAY APPLIANCE CO. v. ENTERPRISE RAILWAY EQUIPMENT CO. |
---|
Term: 1935 |
Important Dates |
Argued: January 16, 1936 |
Decided: March 2, 1936 |
Outcome |
Reversed |
Vote |
9-0 |
Majority |
Louis Dembitz Brandeis • Pierce Butler • Benjamin Nathan Cardozo • Charles Evans Hughes • James Clark McReynolds • Owen Josephus Roberts • Harlan Fiske Stone • George Sutherland • Willis Van Devanter |
WINE RAILWAY APPLIANCE CO. v. ENTERPRISE RAILWAY EQUIPMENT CO. is a case that was decided by the Supreme Court of the United States on March 2, 1936. The case was argued before the court on January 16, 1936.
In a 9-0 ruling, the U.S. Supreme Court reversed the ruling of the lower court. The case originated from the Ohio Northern U.S. District Court.
For a full list of cases decided in the 1930s, click here. For a full list of cases decided by the Hughes Court, click here.
About the case
- Subject matter: Economic Activity - Patents and copyrights: patent
- Petitioner: Inventor, patent assigner, trademark owner or holder
- Petitioner state: Unknown
- Respondent type: Inventor, patent assigner, trademark owner or holder
- Respondent state: Unknown
- Citation: 297 U.S. 387
- How the court took jurisdiction: Cert
- What type of decision was made: Opinion of the court (orally argued)
- Who was the chief justice: Charles Evans Hughes
- Who wrote the majority opinion: James Clark McReynolds
These data points were accessed from The Supreme Court Database, which also attempts to categorize the ideological direction of the court's ruling in each case. This case's ruling was categorized as liberal.
See also
- United States Supreme Court cases and courts
- Supreme Court of the United States
- History of the Supreme Court
- United States federal courts
- Ballotpedia's Robe & Gavel newsletter
External links
Footnotes