Your monthly support provides voters the knowledge they need to make confident decisions at the polls. Donate today.
WISCONSIN DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE v. WILLIAM WRIGLEY, JR., CO. (1992)

![]() |
WISCONSIN DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE v. WILLIAM WRIGLEY, JR., CO. |
---|
Term: 1991 |
Important Dates |
Argued: January 22, 1992 |
Decided: June 19, 1992 |
Outcome |
Reversed and remanded |
Vote |
6-3 |
Majority |
Antonin Scalia • David Souter • John Paul Stevens • Clarence Thomas • Byron White |
Concurring |
Sandra Day O'Connor |
Dissenting |
Harry Blackmun • Anthony Kennedy • William Rehnquist |
WISCONSIN DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE v. WILLIAM WRIGLEY, JR., CO. is a case that was decided by the Supreme Court of the United States on June 19, 1992. The case was argued before the court on January 22, 1992.
In a 6-3 ruling, the U.S. Supreme Court reversed the ruling of the lower court and remanded the case for further proceedings consistent with the Court's opinion. The case originated from the Wisconsin State Trial Court.
For a full list of cases decided in the 1990s, click here. For a full list of cases decided by the Rehnquist Court, click here.
About the case
- Subject matter: Economic Activity - state or local government tax
- Petitioner: State department or agency
- Petitioner state: Wisconsin
- Respondent type: Manufacturer
- Respondent state: Unknown
- Citation: 505 U.S. 214
- How the court took jurisdiction: Cert
- What type of decision was made: Opinion of the court (orally argued)
- Who was the chief justice: William Rehnquist
- Who wrote the majority opinion: Antonin Scalia
These data points were accessed from The Supreme Court Database, which also attempts to categorize the ideological direction of the court's ruling in each case. This case's ruling was categorized as liberal.
See also
- United States Supreme Court cases and courts
- Supreme Court of the United States
- History of the Supreme Court
- United States federal courts
- Ballotpedia's Robe & Gavel newsletter
External links
Footnotes