Your monthly support provides voters the knowledge they need to make confident decisions at the polls. Donate today.

WOOD, SECRETARY OF STATE OF MISSISSIPPI, et al. v. BROOM (1932)

From Ballotpedia
Jump to: navigation, search

Seal of the Supreme Court of the United States
WOOD, SECRETARY OF STATE OF MISSISSIPPI, et al. v. BROOM
Term: 1932
Important Dates
Argued: October 13, 1932
Decided: October 18, 1932
Outcome
Reversed and remanded
Vote
5-4
Majority
Pierce ButlerCharles Evans HughesJames Clark McReynoldsGeorge SutherlandWillis Van Devanter
Dissenting
Louis Dembitz BrandeisBenjamin Nathan CardozoOwen Josephus RobertsHarlan Fiske Stone

WOOD, SECRETARY OF STATE OF MISSISSIPPI, et al. v. BROOM is a case that was decided by the Supreme Court of the United States on October 18, 1932. The case was argued before the court on October 13, 1932.

In a 5-4 ruling, the U.S. Supreme Court reversed the ruling of the lower court and remanded the case for further proceedings consistent with the Court's opinion. The case originated from the Mississippi Southern U.S. District Court.

For a full list of cases decided in the 1930s, click here. For a full list of cases decided by the Hughes Court, click here.

[1]

About the case

  • Subject matter: Civil Rights - reapportionment: other than plans governed by the Voting Rights Act
  • Petitioner: Governmental official, or an official of an agency established under an interstate compact
  • Petitioner state: Mississippi
  • Respondent type: Political candidate, activist, committee, party, party member, organization, or elected official
  • Respondent state: Unknown
  • Citation: 287 U.S. 1
  • How the court took jurisdiction: Appeal
  • What type of decision was made: Opinion of the court (orally argued)
  • Who was the chief justice: Charles Evans Hughes
  • Who wrote the majority opinion: Charles Evans Hughes

These data points were accessed from The Supreme Court Database, which also attempts to categorize the ideological direction of the court's ruling in each case. This case's ruling was categorized as conservative.

See also

External links

Footnotes