Become part of the movement for unbiased, accessible election information. Donate today.

WOODSTOCK IRON COMPANY v. RICHMOND AND DANVILLE EXTENSION COMPANY (1889)

From Ballotpedia
Jump to: navigation, search

Seal of the Supreme Court of the United States
WOODSTOCK IRON COMPANY v. RICHMOND AND DANVILLE EXTENSION COMPANY
Term: 1888
Important Dates
Argued: February 1, 1889
Decided: March 5, 1889
Outcome
Reversed and remanded
Vote
6-2
Majority
Samuel BlatchfordStephen Johnson FieldMelville Weston FullerHorace GrayJohn Marshall HarlanLucius Quintus Cincinnatus Lamar
Dissenting
Joseph BradleySamuel Freeman Miller

WOODSTOCK IRON COMPANY v. RICHMOND AND DANVILLE EXTENSION COMPANY is a case that was decided by the Supreme Court of the United States on March 5, 1889. The case was argued before the court on February 1, 1889.

In a 6-2 ruling, the U.S. Supreme Court reversed the ruling of the lower court and remanded the case for further proceedings consistent with the Court's opinion. The case originated from the Alabama U.S. Circuit Court for (all) District(s) of Alabama.

For a full list of cases decided in the 1880s, click here. For a full list of cases decided by the Fuller Court, click here.

[1]

About the case

  • Subject matter: Private Action - Contracts
  • Petitioner: Debtor
  • Petitioner state: Unknown
  • Respondent type: Construction industry
  • Respondent state: Unknown
  • Citation: 129 U.S. 643
  • How the court took jurisdiction: Writ of error
  • What type of decision was made: Opinion of the court (orally argued)
  • Who was the chief justice: Melville Weston Fuller
  • Who wrote the majority opinion: Stephen Johnson Field

These data points were accessed from The Supreme Court Database, which also attempts to categorize the ideological direction of the court's ruling in each case. This case's ruling was categorized as unspecifiable.

See also

External links

Footnotes