Your feedback ensures we stay focused on the facts that matter to you most—take our survey.

Washington Advisory Vote 32, Nonbinding Question on Carryout Bag Tax (2020)

From Ballotpedia
Jump to: navigation, search
Washington Advisory Vote 32
Flag of Washington.png
Election date
November 3, 2020
Topic
Taxes
Status
Defeatedd Defeated
Type
Advisory question


Washington Advisory Vote 32, a non-binding question concerning whether to maintain or repeal Senate Bill 5323, was on the ballot in Washington as an advisory question on November 3, 2020. A majority of voters voted in favor of repealing the bill.

A maintain vote supported advising the legislature to maintain Senate Bill 5323, which was designed to levy a tax on certain carryout bags provided by retailers.

A repeal vote supported advising the legislature to repeal Senate Bill 5323, which was designed to levy a tax on certain carryout bags provided by retailers.


Election results

In the chart below, "yes" votes correspond to votes for maintaining the revenue-generating bill, and "no" votes correspond to votes for repealing it.

Washington Advisory Vote 32

Result Votes Percentage
Yes 1,488,767 38.77%

Defeated No

2,350,996 61.23%
Results are officially certified.
Source


Text of measure

Ballot title

The ballot title for the measure was as follows:[1]

The legislature imposed, without a vote of the people, a retail sales tax on pass-through charges retail establishments collect for specified carryout bags, costing $32,000,000 in its first ten years, for government spending.

This tax increase should be:

[] Repealed

[] Maintained[2]

Ten-year cost projection

The ten-year projection of Senate Bill 5323, which Advisory Vote 32 concerned, was expected to be $32 million.[1]

Full text

The full text of Senate Bill 5323 is available here.

Readability score

See also: Ballot measure readability scores, 2020
Using the Flesch-Kincaid Grade Level (FKGL and Flesch Reading Ease (FRE) formulas, Ballotpedia scored the readability of the ballot title and summary for this measure. Readability scores are designed to indicate the reading difficulty of text. The Flesch-Kincaid formulas account for the number of words, syllables, and sentences in a text; they do not account for the difficulty of the ideas in the text. The Washington Attorney General wrote the ballot language for this measure.


The FKGL for the ballot title is grade level 7, and the FRE is 61. The word count for the ballot title is 37, and the estimated reading time is 10 seconds.


Campaign finance

See also: Campaign finance requirements for Washington ballot measures
Total campaign contributions:
Support: $0.00
Opposition: $0.00

Ballotpedia did not identify any committees registered in support of or in opposition to the measure.

If you are aware of a committee registered to support or oppose this measure, please email editor@ballotpedia.org.

Background

Advisory votes

See also: Advisory question

An advisory question is a type of ballot measure in which citizens vote on a non-binding question. The largest difference between an advisory vote and any other type of ballot measure is that the outcome of the ballot question will not result in a new, changed, or rejected law or constitutional amendment. Rather, the advisory question symbolically makes heard the general opinion of the voting population in regard to the issue at hand. In the case of Washington, advisory votes serve to advise the legislature whether or not to maintain or repeal a bill they passed.

History of advisory votes in Washington

Initiative 960, which was sponsored by Tim Eyman and approved by voters in 2007, requires statewide advisory questions whenever the legislature passes a bill that increases tax revenue.

Thirty-eight (38) advisory votes required by Initiative 960 have been on the statewide ballot in Washington from 2012 through 2021. A majority of voters were in favor of maintaining 10 of the tax increases. In the other 28 cases, a majority of voters were in favor of repealing the tax increases in question.


Washington tax advisory votes
Year Measure Topic Maintain vote % Repeal vote %
2021 Advisory Vote 38 Tax on the premiums of captive insurers 42.85% 57.15%
2021 Advisory Vote 37 Tax on capital gains above $250,000 to fund education and child services 38.95% 61.05%
2021 Advisory Vote 36 Telephone tax to fund behavioral health and suicide prevention services 46.11% 53.89%
2020 Advisory Vote 35 Business and occupation tax on commercial airplane manufacturers 45.53% 54.47%
2020 Advisory Vote 34 Business and occupation tax and surcharge 37.99% 62.01%
2020 Advisory Vote 33 Heavy equipment rental tax 40.40% 59.60%
2020 Advisory Vote 32 Carryout bag tax 38.77% 61.23%
2019 Advisory Vote 31 International investment management services tax 56.75% 43.25%
2019 Advisory Vote 30 Tour operator/travel agent tax 44.19% 55.81%
2019 Advisory Vote 29 Excise tax on real property 35.20% 64.80%
2019 Advisory Vote 28 Nonresident sales tax exemption limits 55.29% 44.71%
2019 Advisory Vote 27 Petroleum products tax 39.22% 60.78%
2019 Advisory Vote 26 Online retail sales tax 44.77% 55.23%
2019 Advisory Vote 25 Financial institution tax 44.62% 55.38%
2019 Advisory Vote 24 Business activities tax 37.35% 62.65%
2019 Advisory Vote 23 E-cig/vaping tax 66.91%% 33.09%
2019 Advisory Vote 22 Paint tax 37.97% 62.03%
2019 Advisory Vote 21 Surcharge on timber products 41.10% 58.90%
2019 Advisory Vote 20 Tax on wages 37.08% 62.92%
2018 Advisory Vote 19 Crude oil tax 46.47% 53.53%
2017 Advisory Vote 18 State property tax 40.95% 59.05%
2017 Advisory Vote 17 Business and occupation tax 37.66% 62.34%
2017 Advisory Vote 16 Commercial fishing fees 45.59% 54.41%
2016 Advisory Vote 15 Alternative fuel tax excemption 40.10% 59.90%
2016 Advisory Vote 14 Dental plan tax 30.86% 69.14%
2015 Advisory Vote 13 Manufacturer tax preferences 36.59% 63.41%
2015 Advisory Vote 12 Gas tax increase 35.63% 64.37%
2015 Advisory Vote 11 Medical marijuana fee 58.73% 41.27%
2015 Advisory Vote 10 Oil spill prevention tax 51.32% 48.68%
2014 Advisory Vote 9 Leasehold excise tax 55.27% 44.73%
2014 Advisory Vote 8 Agricultural tax on marijuana 54.41% 45.59%
2013 Advisory Vote 7 Estate tax 51.23% 48.77%
2013 Advisory Vote 6 Retaill sales tax exemption 47.74% 52.26%
2013 Advisory Vote 5 Insurance premium tax 39.52% 60.48%
2013 Advisory Vote 4 Aircraft excise tax 53.54% 46.46%
2013 Advisory Vote 3 Leasehold excise tax 52.47% 47.53%
2012 Advisory Vote 2 Pollution liability insurance 45.00% 55.00%
2012 Advisory Vote 1 Omnibus tax preference 43.10% 56.90%

Path to the ballot

The measure was automatically referred to the ballot as required under Initiative 960, an initiative that was passed in 2007. I-960 requires an advisory vote to be referred to voters concerning any law passed by the legislature that creates or increases taxes or fees.[3] Advisory Vote 32 was a nonbinding question advising the legislature to either maintain or repeal Senate Bill 5323, which was passed in the 2020 legislative session.[1]

Senate Bill 5323

The vote in the legislature on Senate Bill 5323 was as follows:[1]

Vote in the Washington House of Representatives
March 7, 2020
Requirement: Approval in both chambers of the legislature
YesNoNot voting
Total67291
Total percent68.4%29.6%1.02%

Vote in the Washington State Senate
March 9, 2020
Requirement: Approval in both chambers of the legislature
YesNoNot voting
Total33151
Total percent67.3%30.6%2.04%

How to cast a vote

See also: Voting in Washington

Click "Show" to learn more about voter registration, identification requirements, and poll times in Washington.

See also

External links

Footnotes

  1. 1.0 1.1 1.2 1.3 Washington Secretary of State, "2020 general election voters' guide," accessed September 25, 2020
  2. Note: This text is quoted verbatim from the original source. Any inconsistencies are attributable to the original source.
  3. Washington Office of Financial Management, "Tax & fee proposals (I-960)," accessed September 20, 2019
  4. Washington Secretary of State, “Frequently Asked Questions on Voting by Mail,” accessed April 20, 2023
  5. 5.0 5.1 Washington Secretary of State, "Voter Eligibility," accessed April 20, 2023
  6. Washington State Legislature, "Voter registration deadlines," accessed April 20, 2023
  7. 7.0 7.1 7.2 The Hill, "Wash. gov signs universal voter registration law," March 20, 2018
  8. Washington Secretary of State, "Washington State Voter Registration Form," accessed November 2, 2024
  9. Under federal law, the national mail voter registration application (a version of which is in use in all states with voter registration systems) requires applicants to indicate that they are U.S. citizens in order to complete an application to vote in state or federal elections, but does not require voters to provide documentary proof of citizenship. According to the U.S. Department of Justice, the application "may require only the minimum amount of information necessary to prevent duplicate voter registrations and permit State officials both to determine the eligibility of the applicant to vote and to administer the voting process."
  10. Washington State Legislature, "RCW 29A.40.160," accessed April 20, 2023