Everything you need to know about ranked-choice voting in one spot. Click to learn more!

Washington Advisory Vote 38, Nonbinding Question on Captive Insurers Tax (2021)

From Ballotpedia
Jump to: navigation, search
Washington Advisory Vote 38
Flag of Washington.png
Election date
November 2, 2021
Topic
Taxes
Status
Defeatedd Defeated
Type
Advisory question

2021 measures
November 2
Washington Advisory Vote 36 Defeated
Washington Advisory Vote 37 Defeated
Washington Advisory Vote 38 Defeated
Polls
Voter guides
Campaign finance
Signature costs

Washington Advisory Vote 38, a non-binding question on a tax on captive insurers, was on the ballot in Washington as an advisory question on November 2, 2021. It was defeated.

A "maintain" vote would have advised the legislature to maintain a 2% tax on the premiums of captive insurers, which was passed in Senate Bill 5315 (2021). Captive insurers are owned by the entities they insure.

A "repeal" vote advised the legislature to repeal a 2% tax on the premiums of captive insurers, which was passed in Senate Bill 5315 (2021).


Election results

In the chart below, "yes" votes correspond to votes for maintaining the revenue-generating bill, and "no" votes correspond to votes for repealing it.

Washington Advisory Vote 38

Result Votes Percentage
Yes 761,093 42.85%

Defeated No

1,015,197 57.15%
Results are officially certified.
Source


Overview

What was Advisory Vote 38?

See also: Text of measure

Advisory Vote 38 was a non-binding question asking voters to advise the legislature on whether to uphold or repeal Senate Bill 5315, passed by the Washington State Legislature in the 2021 session. SB 5315 was designed to impose a tax on captive insurers in the amount of 2% of the insurance premiums provided to a captive insurer's parent company or affiliate. A captive insurance company was defined in the bill as one "created and wholly owned by one or more non-insurance companies to insure the risks of its owner or owners. They may be formed to supplement commercial insurance, or to provide insurance for risk they are unable to cover with commercial insurance." The bill set up a framework for registering captive insurers and levying a premium tax on them.[1]

Since the question was non-binding, the outcome of the ballot question was not legally binding and did not directly result in a new, changed, or rejected law.

Why was this measure on the ballot?

See also: Path to the ballot

The measure was automatically referred to the ballot as required under Initiative 960, an initiative sponsored by Tim Eyman that was approved by voters in 2007. I-960 requires an advisory vote to be referred to voters concerning any law passed by the legislature that creates or increases taxes or fees.[2]

How many advisory votes have been on the ballot since the first in 2012?

See also: History of Washington advisory votes

Thirty-five (35) advisory votes required by Initiative 960 have been on the statewide ballot in Washington from 2012 through 2020. A majority of voters were in favor of maintaining 10 of the tax increases. In the other 25 cases, a majority of voters were in favor of repealing the tax increases in question.

Text of measure

Ballot title

The ballot title for the measure was as follows:[1]

The legislature imposed, without a vote of the people, a tax on captive insurers in the amount of 2% of premiums from owners/affiliates, costing $53,000,000 in its first ten years, for government spending.

This tax increase should be:

[] Repealed

[] Maintained[3]

Ten-year cost projection

The ten-year cost of Senate Bill 5315, which Advisory Vote 38 concerned, was estimated to be $53 million.[4]

Full text

The full text of Senate Bill 5315 is available here.


Readability score

See also: Ballot measure readability scores, 2021
Using the Flesch-Kincaid Grade Level (FKGL and Flesch Reading Ease (FRE) formulas, Ballotpedia scored the readability of the ballot title and summary for this measure. Readability scores are designed to indicate the reading difficulty of text. The Flesch-Kincaid formulas account for the number of words, syllables, and sentences in a text; they do not account for the difficulty of the ideas in the text. The Washington Attorney General wrote the ballot language for this measure.


The FKGL for the ballot title is grade level 7, and the FRE is 60. The word count for the ballot title is 39, and the estimated reading time is 10 seconds.


Campaign finance

See also: Campaign finance requirements for Washington ballot measures
Total campaign contributions:
Support: $0.00
Opposition: $0.00

Ballotpedia did not identify any committees registered in support of or in opposition to the measure.

If you are aware of a committee registered to support or oppose this measure, please email editor@ballotpedia.org.

Media editorials

See also: 2021 ballot measure media endorsements

Ballotpedia lists the positions of media editorial boards that support or oppose ballot measures. This does not include opinion pieces from individuals or groups that do not represent the official position of a newspaper or media outlet. Ballotpedia includes editorials from newspapers and outlets based on circulation and readership, political coverage within a state, and length of publication. You can share media editorial board endorsements with us at editor@ballotpedia.org.

Support (maintain)

  • The Seattle Times Editorial Board: "Maintain. This concerns a 2% tax on captive insurers. The Times editorial board supported this proposal, which closes a tax loophole for large companies that essentially purchase insurance policies from themselves. The tax is estimated to generate $53 million in revenue over the next decade."


Opposition (repeal)

If you are aware of a media editorial supporting a repeal vote, please send an email with a link to editor@ballotpedia.org.

Background

Advisory votes

See also: Advisory question

An advisory question is a type of ballot measure that ask votes a non-binding question. The largest difference between an advisory vote and any other type of ballot measure is that the outcome of the ballot question is not legally binding and will not directly result in a new, changed, or rejected law or constitutional amendment. Rather, the advisory question allows voters to express their general opinion on the issue. Washington has automatic advisory votes on any bill that increases tax revenue.

History of advisory votes in Washington

See also: Washington Rules for Approving Tax Increases, Initiative 960 (2007)

Initiative 960, which was sponsored by Tim Eyman and approved by voters in 2007, requires statewide advisory questions whenever the legislature passes a bill that increases tax revenue.

Thirty-eight (38) advisory votes required by Initiative 960 have been on the statewide ballot in Washington from 2012 through 2021. A majority of voters were in favor of maintaining 10 of the tax increases. In the other 28 cases, a majority of voters were in favor of repealing the tax increases in question.


Washington tax advisory votes
Year Measure Topic Maintain vote % Repeal vote %
2021 Advisory Vote 38 Tax on the premiums of captive insurers 42.85% 57.15%
2021 Advisory Vote 37 Tax on capital gains above $250,000 to fund education and child services 38.95% 61.05%
2021 Advisory Vote 36 Telephone tax to fund behavioral health and suicide prevention services 46.11% 53.89%
2020 Advisory Vote 35 Business and occupation tax on commercial airplane manufacturers 45.53% 54.47%
2020 Advisory Vote 34 Business and occupation tax and surcharge 37.99% 62.01%
2020 Advisory Vote 33 Heavy equipment rental tax 40.40% 59.60%
2020 Advisory Vote 32 Carryout bag tax 38.77% 61.23%
2019 Advisory Vote 31 International investment management services tax 56.75% 43.25%
2019 Advisory Vote 30 Tour operator/travel agent tax 44.19% 55.81%
2019 Advisory Vote 29 Excise tax on real property 35.20% 64.80%
2019 Advisory Vote 28 Nonresident sales tax exemption limits 55.29% 44.71%
2019 Advisory Vote 27 Petroleum products tax 39.22% 60.78%
2019 Advisory Vote 26 Online retail sales tax 44.77% 55.23%
2019 Advisory Vote 25 Financial institution tax 44.62% 55.38%
2019 Advisory Vote 24 Business activities tax 37.35% 62.65%
2019 Advisory Vote 23 E-cig/vaping tax 66.91%% 33.09%
2019 Advisory Vote 22 Paint tax 37.97% 62.03%
2019 Advisory Vote 21 Surcharge on timber products 41.10% 58.90%
2019 Advisory Vote 20 Tax on wages 37.08% 62.92%
2018 Advisory Vote 19 Crude oil tax 46.47% 53.53%
2017 Advisory Vote 18 State property tax 40.95% 59.05%
2017 Advisory Vote 17 Business and occupation tax 37.66% 62.34%
2017 Advisory Vote 16 Commercial fishing fees 45.59% 54.41%
2016 Advisory Vote 15 Alternative fuel tax excemption 40.10% 59.90%
2016 Advisory Vote 14 Dental plan tax 30.86% 69.14%
2015 Advisory Vote 13 Manufacturer tax preferences 36.59% 63.41%
2015 Advisory Vote 12 Gas tax increase 35.63% 64.37%
2015 Advisory Vote 11 Medical marijuana fee 58.73% 41.27%
2015 Advisory Vote 10 Oil spill prevention tax 51.32% 48.68%
2014 Advisory Vote 9 Leasehold excise tax 55.27% 44.73%
2014 Advisory Vote 8 Agricultural tax on marijuana 54.41% 45.59%
2013 Advisory Vote 7 Estate tax 51.23% 48.77%
2013 Advisory Vote 6 Retaill sales tax exemption 47.74% 52.26%
2013 Advisory Vote 5 Insurance premium tax 39.52% 60.48%
2013 Advisory Vote 4 Aircraft excise tax 53.54% 46.46%
2013 Advisory Vote 3 Leasehold excise tax 52.47% 47.53%
2012 Advisory Vote 2 Pollution liability insurance 45.00% 55.00%
2012 Advisory Vote 1 Omnibus tax preference 43.10% 56.90%

Path to the ballot

The measure was automatically referred to the ballot as required under Initiative 960, an initiative that was passed in 2007. I-960 requires an advisory vote to be referred to voters concerning any law passed by the legislature that creates or increases taxes or fees.[2]

Advisory Vote 38 was a nonbinding question advising the legislature to either maintain or repeal a tax on captive insurers, which was passed in Senate Bill 5315 during the 2021 legislative session.[1]

Senate Bill 5315

The vote in the legislature on Senate Bill 5315 was as follows:[4]

Vote in the Washington State Senate
March 9, 2021
Requirement: Approval in both chambers of the legislature
YesNoNot voting
Total4900
Total percent100.00%0.00%0.00%
Democrat2900
Republican2000

Vote in the Washington House of Representatives
April 9, 2021
Requirement: Approval in both chambers of the legislature
YesNoNot voting
Total9611
Total percent97.96%1.02%1.02%
Democrat5511
Republican4100

How to cast a vote

See also: Voting in Washington

Click "Show" to learn more about voter registration, identification requirements, and poll times in Washington.

See also

External links

Footnotes

  1. 1.0 1.1 1.2 Washington Secretary of State, "Attorney General's Certification Letter for Advisory Vote No. 38," accessed July 28, 2021
  2. 2.0 2.1 Washington Office of Financial Management, "Tax & fee proposals (I-960)," accessed July 28, 2021
  3. Note: This text is quoted verbatim from the original source. Any inconsistencies are attributable to the original source.
  4. 4.0 4.1 Washington Secretary of State, "2021 General Election Voters' Guide," accessed August 9, 2021
  5. Washington Secretary of State, “Frequently Asked Questions on Voting by Mail,” accessed April 20, 2023
  6. 6.0 6.1 Washington Secretary of State, "Voter Eligibility," accessed April 20, 2023
  7. Washington State Legislature, "Voter registration deadlines," accessed April 20, 2023
  8. 8.0 8.1 8.2 The Hill, "Wash. gov signs universal voter registration law," March 20, 2018
  9. Washington Secretary of State, "Washington State Voter Registration Form," accessed November 2, 2024
  10. Under federal law, the national mail voter registration application (a version of which is in use in all states with voter registration systems) requires applicants to indicate that they are U.S. citizens in order to complete an application to vote in state or federal elections, but does not require voters to provide documentary proof of citizenship. According to the U.S. Department of Justice, the application "may require only the minimum amount of information necessary to prevent duplicate voter registrations and permit State officials both to determine the eligibility of the applicant to vote and to administer the voting process."
  11. Washington State Legislature, "RCW 29A.40.160," accessed April 20, 2023