Washington Prohibit Marijuana Cultivation, Processing, and Sales in Residential Zones Initiative (2018)
| Washington Prohibit Marijuana Cultivation, Processing, and Sales in Residential Zones Initiative | |
|---|---|
 | |
| Election date November 6, 2018 | |
| Topic Marijuana | |
| Status Not on the ballot | |
| Type State statute | Origin Citizens |
The Washington Prohibit Marijuana Cultivation, Processing, and Sales in Residential Zones Initiative (#1633) was not on the ballot in Washington as an Initiative to the People, a type of initiated state statute, on November 6, 2018.
This initiative would have prohibited the cultivation, processing, and sales of marijuana in areas zoned as residential.[1][2]
Text of measure
Ballot title
The ballot title for this initiative is below:[2]
| “ |
Initiative Measure No. 1633 concerns marijuana and cannabis (defined). This measure would prohibit the production, processing, or sale of marijuana and cannabis (as defined) in residential-zoned neighborhoods; set a criminal penalty for related violations; and subject violators to property seizure and forfeiture. Should this measure be enacted into law? [3] |
” |
Ballot summary
The ballot summary for this initiative is below:[2]
| “ |
This measure would prohibit the production, processing, or sale of marijuana and cannabis in residentially zoned neighborhoods. It would make the violation of zoning laws for marijuana or cannabis production, processing, or sales a class C felony. It would also subject violators to property seizure and forfeiture. The measure would define “cannabis” as “any of the preparations (such as marijuana) or chemicals (such as THC) that are derived from the hemp and are psychoactive.” [3] |
” |
Full text
- The full text of the initiative is available here.
Path to the ballot
The state process
In Washington, the number of signatures required to qualify a directly initiated state statute—called an Initiative to the People in Washington—for the ballot is equal to 8 percent of the votes cast for the office of governor at the last regular gubernatorial election. Initial filings for direct initiatives cannot be made more than 10 months before the general election at which their proposal would be presented to voters. Signatures must be submitted at least four months prior to the general election.
The requirements to get an Initiative to the People certified for the 2018 ballot:
- Signatures: 259,622 valid signatures were required.
- Deadline: The deadline to submit signatures was July 6, 2018.
The secretary of state verifies the signatures using a random sample method. If the sample indicates that the measure has sufficient signatures, the measure is certified for the ballot. However, if the sample indicates that the measure has insufficient signatures, every signature is checked. Under Washington law, a random sample result may not invalidate a petition.
Details about this initiative
- Regis Costello submitted this initiative on March 7, 2018.[2]
- A ballot title and summary were issued for this initiative on March 26, 2018.[2]
- Proponents of the initiative did not submit signatures to the secretary of state's office by the July 6, 2018, deadline and the measure was not put on the ballot.[4][2]
See also
External links
Footnotes
- ↑ Washington secretary of state, "Initiative #1633 Text," accessed January 24, 2018
- ↑ 2.0 2.1 2.2 2.3 2.4 2.5 Washington secretary of state, "Proposed Initiatives to the People - 2018," accessed January 24, 2018
- ↑ 3.0 3.1 Note: This text is quoted verbatim from the original source. Any inconsistencies are attributable to the original source.
- ↑ Ballotpedia Staff Writer, Email communication with Lydia Plukchi of the Washington Secretary of State's office, July 9, 2018.
 |
State of Washington Olympia (capital) |
|---|---|
| Elections |
What's on my ballot? | Elections in 2026 | How to vote | How to run for office | Ballot measures |
| Government |
Who represents me? | U.S. President | U.S. Congress | Federal courts | State executives | State legislature | State and local courts | Counties | Cities | School districts | Public policy |
