Become part of the movement for unbiased, accessible election information. Donate today.
West Hills Community College District Bond Issue, Measure T (November 2014)
| Bond elections |
|---|
| 2018 • 2017 • 2016 • 2015 2014 • 2013 • 2012 • 2011 2010 • 2009 • 2008 All years and states |
| Property tax elections |
| 2018 • 2017 • 2016 • 2015 2014 • 2013 • 2012 • 2011 2010 • 2009 • 2008 All years and states |
| See also |
| State comparisons How voting works Approval rates |
A West Hills Community College District Bond Issue, Measure T ballot question was on the November 4, 2014 election ballot for voters in the West Hills Community College District in San Benito, Fresno, Kings, Madera and Monterey counties in California. It was approved.
Upon approval, Measure T authorized the district to increase its debt by $20 million through issuing general obligation bonds in that amount.[1]
District officials estimated the average additional property tax rate required to repay these bonds at $9.87 per $100,000 of assessed property value.[1]
A 55 percent supermajority vote was required for the approval of Measure T.
Election results
 Measure T
| ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| County: | Yes | No | ||
| Votes | % | Votes | % | |
| Madera County | 47 | 50.5% | 45 | 49.5% |
| Monterey County | 4 | 100.00% | 0 | 0.00% |
| San Benito County | 1 | 0.00% | 2 | 100.00% |
| Kings County | 3,413 | 55.15% | 2,776 | 44.85% |
| Fresno County | 3,211 | 61.03% | 2,050 | 38.97% |
| Totals: | 6,676 | 57.81% | 4,873 | 42.19% |
| Measure T | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Result | Votes | Percentage | ||
| Yes | 6,676 | 57.81% | ||
| No | 4,873 | 42.19% | ||
Text of measure
Ballot question
The question on the ballot appeared as:[1]
| “ |
To increase student access to computers; maintain and upgrade educational software; keep pace with 21st century technological innovations; and significantly reduce borrowing costs, shall West Hills Community College District issue $20,000,000 of short-term bonds with the interest rates at or below the legal limit, independent citizen oversight, and no money for administrator/teacher salaries, so long as all funds are spent locally and cannot be taken by the State?[2] |
” |
Full text & impartial analysis
The full text of the bond measure and the county counsel's impartial analysis of Measure T are available here.
See also
- Local school bonds on the ballot
- California school bond elections
- Madera County, California ballot measures
- San Benito County, California ballot measures
- Monterey County, California ballot measures
- Kings County, California ballot measures
- Fresno County, California ballot measures
- November 4, 2014 ballot measures in California
External links
Footnotes
- ↑ 1.0 1.1 1.2 San Benito Elections Office, "Ballot Measure information for Measure T," archived September 13, 2014
- ↑ Note: This text is quoted verbatim from the original source. Any inconsistencies are attributable to the original source.
 |
State of California Sacramento (capital) |
|---|---|
| Elections |
What's on my ballot? | Elections in 2025 | How to vote | How to run for office | Ballot measures |
| Government |
Who represents me? | U.S. President | U.S. Congress | Federal courts | State executives | State legislature | State and local courts | Counties | Cities | School districts | Public policy |
